Jack of all trades, master of none.
Well, at least she has a Masters. Doesn't mean I would subpoena her instead of Condi or Wolfowitz. The same reason I will listen to actual biologists than an advocate lawyer when it comes to evolution.
Then why should we listen to the evo proponents on these threads? Many of them, by their own admission on these threads, have no degree in the biological sciences, yet continue to tell the non-evo crowd that they are wrong about evolution. Well, if Phyllis Schlafly's word on the subject had no credibility because she's not a biologist, that should logically apply to all the non-biologist evos on these threads. They are not qualified to speak on the subject any more than she is so their word on the subject has no more credibility than that which they give her.