Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Angelides proposes cuts to middle-class Californians
AP - Monterey County Herald ^ | Aug. 16, 2006 | JULIET WILLIAMS

Posted on 08/16/2006 2:38:47 PM PDT by calcowgirl

SACRAMENTO - Responding to weeks of attacks from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's campaign, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Phil Angelides on Wednesday pledged to cut taxes for the lowest income earners in a bid to restyle himself as the savior of the middle class.

Angelides said his plan would save about 2.5 million California families about $250 a year and cost couples who earn more than $1 million annually only about $8 a day - "not much more than a couple of lattes so that we can balance the budget and give a boost to hardworking families once again."

He said it would bring the state's wealthiest people into the same tax bracket as under former Governors Ronald Reagan and Pete Wilson for a period of three years, while restoring "the California dream" he and his parents enjoyed by working hard.

"I'm running for governor because hardworking, middle-class families are working longer for less - caught in a never-ending obstacle course of stagnant salaries, soaring gas prices, higher tuition for their kids, and higher health care costs - if they can afford health care at all," he told a crowd at a Boys & Girls Club in Los Angeles.

He was scheduled to appear later Wednesday with Sen. Dianne Feinstein in San Francisco.

At his own news conference in Sacramento, Schwarzenegger appeared with anti-tax advocates who have endorsed him and reaffirmed his opposition to any tax hikes. He said he has cut taxes, while Angelides wants to raise them.

"We trust the people to spend the money," Schwarzenegger said. "They trust the government to spend the money."

The Republican governor's campaign has been seeking to undermine Angelides' campaign promises by drawing attention to how much they would cost - first claiming they totaled $10 billion, then raising the figure to $18 billion this week. But that figure is inflated by including the cost of an Angelides health care measure that would not be funded through taxes and an increase in education funding Angelides has disavowed.

Angelides' proposal would provide a refundable credit equivalent to 15 percent of the federal Earned Income Tax Credit, up to $660 a year, on a sliding scale, to people who earn less than $46,000 a year, the campaign said. Those who already avoid income taxes because they earn so little could use the credit toward sales and property taxes.

It also would increase the state's child dependent credit to $483 per child, from $283, for taxpayers earning up to $100,000 a year. The campaign said the tax cut would eliminate the entire tax liability for some working families.

Angelides said he would seek to eliminate California's estimated $4.5 billion budget deficit for the next fiscal year during his first 100 days of office and stop borrowing to fund vital programs, invoking the record of former President Clinton.

"As governor, I'll do what President Clinton did when he took office. I'll balance the budget. I'll put an end to Schwarzenegger's borrowing spree. I'll cut wasteful spending, crack down on tax cheats, and get rid of needless corporate tax loopholes," he told supporters.


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: angelides; calgov2006; schwarzenegger
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: calcowgirl
Tax cut my behind. That's just trussed up welfare. "Free money" from the government. And high income earners get to pay an additional $3k a year for the privilege of living in the people's republic.
21 posted on 08/16/2006 3:35:54 PM PDT by somniferum (Annoy a liberal.. Work hard and be happy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

--fortunately, I'm not a Commiefornian--the only reason to vote for Aaahhhnnnnooollllddd is Angelides----


22 posted on 08/16/2006 4:17:50 PM PDT by rellimpank (Don't believe anything about firearms or explosives stated by the mass media---NRABenefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Angelides -

Robin Hood....or

pandering whore ?

23 posted on 08/16/2006 4:25:05 PM PDT by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bigh4u2
Hmmmm. Anyone know how many 'million dollar earners' are in California? Besides the movie industry and GOVERNMENT officials, that is.

Paying 2.5 million California families about $250 a year is 625 million. $8 a day from those who earn over $1 million is $2920 a year. So there must be over 214000 taxpayers who earn over $1 million.

24 posted on 08/16/2006 4:58:16 PM PDT by etlib (No creature without tentacles has ever developed true intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Angelides said his plan would save about 2.5 million California families about $250 a year and cost couples who earn more than $1 million annually only about $8 a day

Cali-Dems must be incredibly stupid.

The poor wouls save $250 and the rich would save $2,920

25 posted on 08/16/2006 5:31:37 PM PDT by GeronL (flogerloon.blogspot.com -------------> Rise of the Hate Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheOracleAtLilac

Are those mutually exclusive? ;-)


26 posted on 08/16/2006 5:46:27 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Angelides wants to offer a targeted tax break. Interesting. If you're "too rich" you still get hit up. The median income in this state is $38,000. So its still a tax increase. Angelides thinks he's fooling people by offering them a tax credit. Its not even a down payment on a home in California!

(No more Olmert! No more Kadima! No more Oslo!)

27 posted on 08/16/2006 8:15:56 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Are those mutually exclusive?

Yeah, if yer Phil's campaign manager.

28 posted on 08/17/2006 7:18:39 AM PDT by TheOracleAtLilac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson