yup, nows a good time to look around...
Posted on 08/20/2006 7:49:13 AM PDT by Flavius
DETROIT (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. said Friday it would temporarily halt production at 10 assembly plants between now and the end of the year, blaming high gas prices for pushing many consumers away from its pickups and SUVs and toward higher-mileage models.
ADVERTISEMENT Ford said the cuts will reduce the need for costly incentives to reduce bloated inventories. But they also illustrate just how out of step the lineup at the nation's second-largest automaker has become, as it loses market share to mostly Asian competitors under the watch of Chairman and Chief Executive Bill Ford.
General Motors Corp. and DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler Group also have been caught in the shift away from trucks and SUVs to smaller cars and crossovers as consumers seek better fuel economy. The Big Three's combined U.S. market share fell to 54.5 percent for the first seven months of 2006, down from 58.7 percent in the same period a year ago.
GM already has announced it will cut production 7 percent to 8 percent in the third-quarter.
Ford announced a turnaround plan in January that called for shedding 25,000 to 30,000 jobs and closing 14 plants by 2012. By year's end, the company was to have cut production capacity 15 percent.
Bill Ford said last month that the plan -- dubbed the "Way Forward" -- would be accelerated. He said Friday that the details would be revealed in September.
In response to the production cuts, Fitch Ratings downgraded Ford's debt further into junk status, while two other ratings agencies placed the company on review. Analysts said next month's announcements could include more plant closures and job cuts, as well as speeded-up introductions of new cars and crossovers.
The company said fourth-quarter production would be down 21 percent, or 168,000 units, from last year. Third-quarter production will be 20,000 units below what was previously announced and 78,000 units below last year.
For the full year, Ford plans to produce about 9 percent fewer vehicles than last year for a total of just above 3 million.
"We know this decision will have a dramatic impact on our employees, as well as our suppliers," Chairman and Chief Executive Bill Ford said in an e-mail to employees. "This is, however, the right call for our customers, our dealers and our long-term future."
He said it was the company's biggest North American production cut in more than 20 years.
Dearborn-based Ford, which lost $254 million in the second quarter, said last month that the speed of the market shift away from trucks had taken it by surprise. Like other U.S. automakers, Ford is heavily dependent on sport utility vehicles and other trucks, which have far higher profit margins than cars. Last year, 68 percent of the vehicles sold by the company in the U.S. were trucks, compared with 58 percent for the industry as a whole.
"An unprecedented spike in gasoline prices during the second quarter impacted our product lineup more than that of our competitors because of the long-standing success of our trucks and SUVs," Bill Ford said in his note Friday.
The nation's second-largest automaker said that by better matching inventories to demand, it can avoid costly incentives and reduce inventory carrying costs for dealers.
Reducing incentives will help improve resale values of vehicles, and more rational inventories will help "stabilize operating patterns for our plants and our suppliers," Mark Fields, Ford's president of the Americas, said in a statement.
The Wall Street Journal, citing unidentified sources, reported Friday that Ford is considering shutting down more factories and cutting salaried jobs and benefits by 10 percent to 30 percent.
Ford spokesman Oscar Suris declined to comment on the report.
The new production schedule will result in temporary shutdown this year at assembly plants in St. Thomas, Ontario; Chicago; Wixom, Mich.; Louisville, Ky.; Wayne, Mich.; St. Paul, Minn.; Kansas City, Mo.; Norfolk, Va.; and Dearborn, Mich.; Ford said.
Company officials would not say what specific impact the production cuts would have on workers. In general, hourly workers placed on temporary layoff receive 95 percent of their wages through state unemployment benefits and a supplement by Ford.
The United Auto Workers had no immediate comment on the announcement.
In Louisville, which has two affected plants, Mayor Jerry Abramson said he was told by Ford executives that the Louisville Assembly Plant, which makes the Ford Explorer and Mercury Mountaineer, will be shuttered for six weeks. The Kentucky Truck Plant, one of four plants producing the best-selling F-Series pickups, will close for five weeks in the fourth quarter, he said.
Abramson said state and local officials have asked to meet with Ford officials.
The production cuts are the second time this week that slower sales have forced Ford to announce changes. On Tuesday, it said it would trim the number of dealerships it has in 18 metropolitan areas. Dealer profits declined an average of 10 percent in the first half of 2006, the company has said.
In response to the production cuts, Fitch downgraded Ford and its finance arm Ford Motor Credit Co. to "B" from "B+" and lowered its senior unsecured debt to "B+" from "BB-."
"Implicit in the production cutbacks are expectations of continued weak pickup sales that have resulted in extended inventories," the agency said. "Volume declines in Ford's pickup segment, along with continued declines in mid-size and large SUVs, are likely to accelerate revenue declines and negative cash flows in 2006."
Standard & Poor's Ratings Services and Moody's Investors Service both put Ford's credit ratings on review for possible downgrades further into junk territory.
Ford shares fell 17 cents, or 2.1 percent, to close at $8 on the New York Stock Exchange.
Bank of America analyst Ron Tadross said the cuts are a sign that "Ford is getting more realistic about its share trajectory."
Craig Hutson, an auto analyst at the corporate bond research firm Gimme Credit, said that while the cuts are aimed at matching supply and demand in the long term, "the short-term ramifications will be ugly."
"Trucks are Ford's most profitable vehicles, and the sharp decline in production volumes will make it more difficult to see any signs of a turnaround at Ford," he said in a research note.
The production cuts are likely to affect the revenues of many of Ford suppliers.
"When our customers adjust production up or down, we obviously adjust accordingly," said Jim Fisher, a spokesman for Visteon Corp., Ford's largest supplier.
Fisher said the company was assessing the impact of Ford's cuts.
Associated Press Writer Bruce Schreiner in Louisville, Ky., contributed to this report.
Ford Motor Co.: http://www.ford.com/
They,ve been in exit posture since c. 1998.
Well, they still make vehicles for this market..they're just stopping soon. Typically, Isuzus are reliable vehicles, compared to big three anyway and that was my point. Toyota, Honda, Nissan etc. have a quality edge over GM and Ford. Since Chrysler merged with the krauts, quality has improved, but not to the level of Japanese cars.
My bad, the Ascender is a rebadged ENVOY & production wiil stop soon.
If you read/believe the J.D. initial quality surveys, G.M. consistently outscores most of the imports.
Initial Quality?
What does that mean? First 10k? First 1k? Compare a GM with a Honda at 100k. The Honda will have mostly been trouble free.
yup, nows a good time to look around...
He also does a long term durability/reliability study - 3yrs ? but the methodology is quite flawed.
yes but, also management, the owner son, if there is going to be union destruction
all ceo's and sons of the owner need to get canned, also,
any designer that actually thought their car/truck line up looks good
my 2 cents
i will never buy a ford unless they build something that is actually tough and not a pr bs
Don't buy a Toyota - they spend more on gay advertising than Ford.
But then AFA wouldn't dare tell you that...
The Focus was rated as the most reliable Ford by Consumer Reports.
The Mercury Mariner was rated as one of the most reliable vehicles on the market today. 31 models received this designation. The Ford Escape and Ford Focus did not. Yet being identical, they MUST have the same reliability. And the Focus is rated above the Escape.
What does this tell you? There is no statistical difference in Consumer Reports' data between a Focus and the most reliable vehicles on the market today.
"Typically, Isuzus are reliable vehicles, compared to big three anyway and that was my point. Toyota, Honda, Nissan etc. have a quality edge over GM and Ford. Since Chrysler merged with the krauts, quality has improved, but not to the level of Japanese cars. "
Have you looked at the most recent JD Power Vehicle Dependability Study (not to be confused with the Initial Quality Study)?
The ONLY American make that Isuzu beats on dependability is Saturn. Nissan only beats Saturn, Dodge, and Jeep.
Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Buick, Cadillac, and Oldsmobile all were above average (this is the last year Olds will be measured). Lexus finished first, with Mercury, Buick, and Cadillac in #2, #3, and #4 respectively.
So Mercury ranks higher than Toyota, Acura, Honda, Infiniti, Subaru, Nissan, Mazda, Mitsubishi, and Suzuki. Yep, they must STINK compared to the Japanese makes... /sarc
Forget initial quality....
Let's look at their dependability survey... Mercury, Buick, and Cadillac beat out all but Lexus. Lincoln, Ford, and Oldsmobile all end up above average. Nissan, Subaru, Mazda, Mitsubishi - all below average...
I'll take one.
They have massive amounts of space, get respectable gas mileage (equal to a Toyota Avalon), have reasonable power (as low as 8 sec 0-60), and pretty much the HIGHEST safety rating available. Insurance rates are bound to be low, as the insurance claims rate on the Mercury version are only 44% of average, well below almost every other vehicle on the market....
Ok, so its boring....
:)
"Too bad, my husband loves Ford trucks. He drives a F250 King Cab."
Yep and I will probably in the marketing for a new one in a few months too! Diesel of course.
Wow. Thanks for the info. I guess the technology is farther along than I had thought.
Yeah - the only problem is they're still talking just pickups... I haven't heard of any small diesels coming to this side of the pond, something like a Golf TDI but with higher reliability.
But then who knows - there could be a secret out there...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.