Posted on 08/23/2006 4:18:36 AM PDT by Condor 63
I get this a lot, from the distraught and Bush-embarrassed right, whenever I happily cough up Dubya's name in a column that would seem to have nothing whatsoever to do with our bumbling, neck-groping disaster of a whimpering leader:
Hey (I'm paraphrasing here) you gay-loving yoga pervert communist! What the gosh-golly hell does George W. Bush possibly have to do with (fill in the blank) cancer rates/MS Windows/electric sports cars/Christina Aguilera? Why do you insist on sneaking in little slaps and stabs at the beleaguered monkeyman even when writing about problems and issues that (seemingly) have nothing to do with him -- like, say, iTunes or vibrators or global warming? Why, in other words, do you blame every social ill on Dubya? It's so not fair!
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
You already know the answer to that question.
Hey, where's the BARF alert on this damn thing?
The paragraph preview should have taken care of that for 'ya. LOL
Is it legal to say Morford & vibrator in the same article?
Wow. Morford got almost all the way through the second paragraph before making a sexual reference.
I would not go that route (writing the SF rag to tell them of your displeasure with the column).
They feed on such things.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.