Posted on 08/28/2006 5:14:42 AM PDT by Halfmanhalfamazing
We have... and it's most likely that inumerable images have been radically altered on ALL topics... if not flat-out 'created'. It's amazing what a trained, retoucher can do in Photoshop... in high-end advertising, you can earn a good living at it.
I agree, this is crying wolf. I think it should be removed from Breaking News.
I think it's "fake but accurate".....:)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^You can see the photo is shooting into a tough light situation. The open sky on the upper right most likely made the aperture close way down resulting in a dark picture.^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
That's not open sky. As Armor over at NB noted, that's not sky.
I've never seen the sky with clean writing on it. Have you?
It's got arabic writing on it, then it says "AL JANGUS", whatever that means.
High Volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel.
also Keywords 2006israelwar or WOT [War on Terror]
----------------------------
I'm more worried about Israel's doctored military apparatus.
Bush Derangement Syndrome is proven to prevent learning from past mistakes in 99.9% of journalists and dems.
how so?
Washed out UN seems more appropriate!
All I see is little red x's.
I can't believe no one caught this. "A French United Nations vehicle". A white flag. Whats the running joke about France???????
Not only is it doctored...its a joke at the French military. Or France itself.
Sometimes I think people get their panties in a wad for the sake of that wedgies feeling. So what? This guy smiling at a white flag or a UN flag makes no difference to me. When I first clicked onto this thread, before I read the part about the smile directed to the white flag, I simply couldn't find any part of the picture that made me think anything other than this guy looks like a kid. The photographer probably saw the connection, took the shot and had to lighten it to get Nasrallah to even appear. Lightening the photo makes the image on photo paper look like the image the cameraman saw. That is not dishonest. It's no more dishonest than a photojournalist using a telephoto lens, or a polarizing one, or a sketch artist doing the graphic. Sometimes I think people need a bit more Zoloft in their lives.. |
Yeah, to us it's a non-event. But I think, to the average hezbo/hezbo- supporter on the street, it accomplishes what the propagandist/photographer intended.
The marquis of Nasrallah on the side of the building is pretty dark compared to the rest of the photograph. I'm still a novice in Photoshop, but it looks to me as if the contrast was pumped up so Nasrallah's face wasn't in the dark. It resulted in washing out the rest of the image.
As to the words hanging in the sky, I'd assumed they were letters on posts. You don't see them often in the US anymore but they're still around.
^^^^^^^^^^I have taken thousands of pictures, edited them in photoshop, yadda yadda yadda I wont bore you with the details....^^^^^^^^^^
I don't doubt your experience, and that does appear to be sky, however I've never seen writing like that any time I've looked up.
If anything, it looks like it's a separate banner. Note the orange bar inbetween the nasrallah photo and what appears to be sky on the right.
Yellow writing doesn't appear in skies, but it does on wall/banners.
^^^^^^^^^^Save it for the real thing.^^^^^^^^^^
Yeah, I have to agree. However, with all that Reuters and other lib media outlets have done up until this point, you can't blame people for overscrutinizing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.