Skip to comments.
Alarm sounds on US population boom
The Boston Globe ^
| August 31, 2006
| John Donnelly
Posted on 08/31/2006 7:03:11 AM PDT by A. Pole
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
To: A. Pole
I've been sounding this alarm for years. No one cares.
To: b4its2late
It ain't due to births I'm sure.
It's a factor.....the illegals are reproducing as fast as they can.
To: A. Pole
America's competitiveness is derived from its human capital. The fact that the rate of growth in our population has and will continue to exceed that of Europe is the precise reason why we have regularly outpaced them economically over the past 25 years.
I am convinced that we need a population approaching 500 million by 2050 if we hope to remain the global economic superpower given the expected growth of China and India. I'm also convinced we will reach that mark through a mix of our higher fertility rates (vis-a-vis Europe) and, like it or not, immigration.
To: lovecraft
Since we now have nearly 20 million illegals in the US it's more like 2/3rds.......
24
posted on
08/31/2006 7:21:17 AM PDT
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: Vision
How do you figure? While there is a lot of land, the areas with infrastructure are filled. DC's traffic is almost a catastrophe. Sure there are a few small areas that are densely populated, but as a country we are sparsely populated. Just look at our population per mile compared to a lot of other areas in the world.
A friend of mine moved to Atlanta 6 or 7 years ago when they had 2.5 million people. Now they have 4+ million. A 50 percent gain over 7 years makes a big mess, but it is a localilzed mess, not a national situation.
In most of the country everyone from the food growers to the grocery store managers would be orgasmic about the idea of 10 percent more food sales.
25
posted on
08/31/2006 7:22:32 AM PDT
by
DungeonMaster
(More and more churches are nada scriptura.)
To: A. Pole
Actually, as I recall, 20 years ago the US still had only 5-percent of the world's population, but was consuming more than 30% of the world's energy. So, we're making some progress in energy use.
I think this is a made up story, but then it appears in "The Boston Globe." A newspaper not known for its affection for America.
I am so glad that I left Massachusetts 28 years ago. It's chock full of whiners and moaners and crooks and tax raisers.
For you Freepers still residing in the Commonwealth, I admire your pluck and you have my sympathy.
26
posted on
08/31/2006 7:22:42 AM PDT
by
RexBeach
To: YellowRoseofTx
True. Redo:
It ain't due to legal citizens births I'm sure.
27
posted on
08/31/2006 7:23:24 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(There are 3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't.)
To: A. Pole
[The U.S. is] using three times the amount of water per capita than the world average
I assume that the per capita is brought down by the majority of Africa that doesn't have enough drinking water. That fact that we have and use drinking water and can water the lawn doesn't mean we are wasteful. It just means we are fortune enough (because of our amazing country and the people in it) to be able to do that.
Also, the worlds water usage per capita is brought down by the French who conserve water by showering very rarely.
To: A. Pole
For example, the four fastest-growing states -- Nevada, Arizona, Colorado, and Utah -- all have areas of acute water shortages.
In some areas, they don't even meter water. In most others, the rates are well below real market value for some major users.
There is NO water shortage, there is a non-market pricing problem.
(You price ice cream at 5 cents a gallon, and there will be a "shortage," too.)
29
posted on
08/31/2006 7:24:10 AM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Your FRiendly FReeper Patent Attorney)
To: All
DH the farmer would say "They all gotta eat ..." :-)
30
posted on
08/31/2006 7:24:27 AM PDT
by
Cloverfarm
(Children are a blessing)
To: A. Pole
Americans consume like no other nation -- using three times the amount of water per capita than the world average That reminds me, I have to take my car to the car wash.
31
posted on
08/31/2006 7:25:20 AM PDT
by
Alouette
(Psalms of the Day: 39-43)
To: Darnright
Let me guess, the liberals are going to begin a new round of "we're overpopulated, so concerned Americans should limit their families to 2 children".
That's about where the fertility rate is for U.S. women - 2.17 children on average in 2005. They will have to stop the illegals from overbreeding in order to have any effect. It'll be easier just to send them home.
To: A. Pole
A booming population isn't the problem. Problem is it's booming in the desert.
In contrast, the South and the West were booming
33
posted on
08/31/2006 7:26:08 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: kabar
We would have a population growth of less than replacement if we didn't have immigration, legal and illegal, which accounts for three-fourths of all U.S. population growth. Huh?
34
posted on
08/31/2006 7:30:01 AM PDT
by
Ditto
To: Lonely NY Conservative
There ARE things that are worth keeping and not selling.
To: A. Pole
A population boom in th US is not a bad thing if you look at the way things are going in Europe and the rest of the world.
We need to defend and fight for our resources the only way is through direct competition with other growing populations (ie. Chinese, Indian, Arabic).
36
posted on
08/31/2006 7:31:01 AM PDT
by
roaddog727
(Bullsh## doesn't get bridges built.)
To: Lonely NY Conservative
I am convinced that we need a population approaching 500 million by 2050 if we hope to remain the global economic superpower given the expected growth of China and India. Perhaps we will have China's pollution riots too.
37
posted on
08/31/2006 7:32:23 AM PDT
by
lucysmom
To: 50sDad
Exactly. The leftists always point out that we use such-and-such percent of the global fill-in-the-blank supply, while conveniently neglecting to mention how much of the world's GNP we produce using that oil, water, etc. Of course telling the whole truth makes Americans look efficient, not eeeevil. Can't have that.
To: DungeonMaster
But people don't stay in the rural areas. They will come to the cities, which are situated around water. You can't just go out to the country and create one.
I don't care what the rest of the world is like, most of them are hellholes IMO.
39
posted on
08/31/2006 7:36:53 AM PDT
by
Vision
(God did not give us a spirit of timidity, but a spirit of power, love and self-discipline 2Timothy1)
To: CottonBall
>That's about where the fertility rate is for U.S. women - 2.17 children on average in 2005.<
That's not an accident. Back in the late 60's/early 70's, there was a concerted effort to modify behavior, to "save" the world from overpopulation. Students were told it was their responsibility, in order to save the planet, to have only 2 children. Many, many people bought into this. Coupled with birth control, the American family norm ratcheted down to 2.17.
Have you ever noticed the bias society has against people with large families? There is a not-so-subtle pressure to have the perfect family size.
Women today have less time for child raising, because it's very difficult to survive on only one breadwinner. This also factors into why fertility is at a low.
40
posted on
08/31/2006 7:36:59 AM PDT
by
Darnright
(http://www.irey.com/)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-138 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson