PRINCETON, September 12, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) - In a question and answer article published in the UK's Independent today, controversial Princeton University Professor Peter Singer repeats his notorious stand on the killing of disabled newborns. Asked, "Would you kill a disabled baby?", Singer responded, "Yes, if that was in the best interests of the baby and of the family as a whole."
People who oppose Singer's position have maintained that Singer is the logical extension of the culture of death and that society will eventually embrace his stance if there is no shift to the culture of life. Alex Scadenberg, Executive Director of the Euthanasia Prevention Coalition commented to LifeSiteNews.com about Singer saying, "at least he's consistent." In fact, Singer himself uses the abortion debate to justify his murderous stance.
Princeton Professor Singer: And I repeat, I would kill Disabled Infants
8mm
Singer isn't special. He is merely more frank than most about the evil beliefs at the core of modernist dogmas, and more willing to take those ideas to their logical conclusions. Other liberals harbor the same evil beliefs, although they may be less willing to express them or to face what they mean.
Wow, I see my threads have been elevated to "bone chiller" status.