Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE THREAD: Chris Wallace's interview with former President Bill Clinton ... FNC 6pm eastern
FNC | sept., 24, 2006 | me

Posted on 09/24/2006 2:07:59 PM PDT by blogblogginaway

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 541-547 next last
To: truthandlogic

Sure, he did say that he couldn't get the CIA or FBI to certify that it was bin Laden. But who is in charge?
Our system is not one where the President, head of the FBI and head of the CIA are equals.
He could have done whatever he thought was right. Except he never wanted to work - he preferred the party.


201 posted on 09/24/2006 3:54:04 PM PDT by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

I didn't actually read the book, but I did read that it was the absolute truth. LOL


202 posted on 09/24/2006 3:54:20 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: TeddyCon

They do vote in Memphis. Tenn.


203 posted on 09/24/2006 3:55:03 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: GRRRRR
Nothing in Clinton's life has mattered other than himself. That's Clinton's legacy.
204 posted on 09/24/2006 3:55:07 PM PDT by BIGLOOK (Keelhauling is a sensible solution to mutiny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Brit slaps down the notion that we were allowing "torture." I love Brit--he's not allowed to retire, EVER.


205 posted on 09/24/2006 3:55:20 PM PDT by rightwingintelligentsia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

Lol. They got JFK elected in Chicago too.


206 posted on 09/24/2006 3:56:08 PM PDT by TeddyCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

"Someone posted some old threads from that time (post pulled and account suspended and I have no idea why) and there were more than a few Freepers who were accusing Bill of starting wars to cover his scandals much like leftists accused W of starting wars for ulterior motives."



While the peanut gallery did indeed go after Clinton for wagging-the-dog, most of the elected Republican politicians didn't engage in this same debate. In fact, people like McCain actually chastized Clinton for taking troops off the table...and not being tough enough.

Clinton created his own problems...not because of what he did, but because of when he did it. His attacks were curiously timed at the very moments he was having a domestic crisis. The cruise-missile attack on Afghanistan and Sudan occured the week that Monica was making her apparence before the Grand Jury.

As some in the military even noted, Clinton refused to follow up on other leads, thus Clinton's declared war on terror lasted as long as Monica's apparence before the jury. This was such a spontaneuous attack that many in the Joint Chiefs had no idea it was coming--and even Janet Reno questioned the legality of such an attack.

The same was true of Clinton's Impeachment-eve bombing of Iraq. This was an even greater fraud since it was Clinton who shelved this plan earlier in Oct or Nov...and only pulled it out when he needed it on the eve of Impeachment. You can read several accounts from the Pentagon on why many people were skeptical of this attack since Clinton had scrapped it earlier.

Contrary to Clinton's claims, most elected Republicans supported these efforts. In fact, when Tom Delay spoke out about the "timing" of Clinton's attack on Iraq, it was media, the Democrats and even his own Rpublicans who tore him up, with Maxine Waters literally questioning his "patriotism."


207 posted on 09/24/2006 3:57:17 PM PDT by cwb (Liberalism is the opiate of the *sses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~

Sounds like your screen name is being blamed and abused agai! LOL :^)


208 posted on 09/24/2006 3:57:29 PM PDT by landerwy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TeddyCon

We caught them this time and people are going to go to jail over it.


209 posted on 09/24/2006 3:57:34 PM PDT by Coldwater Creek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Waterboarding is not torture. Within 30-60 seconds the terrorist is babbling and naming names. Khalid Sheikh Muhammad held out the longest- 2.5 minutes. But he talked too.


210 posted on 09/24/2006 3:58:15 PM PDT by dennisw (Confucius say man who go through turnstile sideways going to Bangkok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

What I want to know is, what is he REALLY doing with the funds he is raising for the Global Initiative? Who is supervising the money and what is it being spent on and how is it being distributed? And how much of a salary are he and Shrillery being paid out of it?


211 posted on 09/24/2006 3:58:31 PM PDT by flyingtabby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

Clinton is a Rat and I'll tell you, if he got in my face like he did Chris Wallaces' face, I would have gotten right back in his face and bring up all the facts about what a failure he was along with being a deviant.

One good thing, let the democRATS hang Slick Willy around their necks and see how far they get. The RATS have naught caught on to this yet.


212 posted on 09/24/2006 3:59:27 PM PDT by rambo316 (Social engineering does not work and never will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

The Left Wing of the Dimocrap party wants Hillary gone.
1) They do not want any presidential candidate in favor of continued military intervention in Iraq , Afghanistan and possibly Iran and Israel.

2) Howard Deaniac, Vermont's Village Idiot, is in charge of the DNC purse strings and will see that Hillary gets very little money.

3) The MSM Slimes have congealed a uniform policy, prompted by Dimocrap leftists,to tell the truth about Slick Willy ( The Path to 9/11 and talk shows) so that his viability as a fund raiser for Hillary's presidential run will be weakened or destroyed.

Hillary Clinton will NEVER become POTUS.

We will get something much worse, if you can imagine that.

The Dems intend to nominate a socialist liberal for the Presidency, one who:

1) will preach the new age doctrine of Global Warming,

2) socialized control of industry,

3)socialized medicine,

4)the conversion of the US military into a minimally armed peace corps,

5)and the creation of hate speech laws which limit our freedom of speech(including blogs like free republic),

6) and a gun control policy which will require the registration of all firearms in the USA and a limitation on who can purchase guns ( only dems).

7) Lead an appeasement of Islamofascism policy through the UN.

8) Bring in an Equal rights Amendment to the Constitution for Women.

9) Make Lesbian and Homosexual Marriage a protected right

10) Allow continued unregulated migration by millions of Mexicans and South Americans into the USA.

That leftist Demoncrap Presidential candidate will be much worse than Hillary EVER hoped to be.

The Leftists Dims are now bent on the destruction of the Clintons for the benefit of their own leftist/socialist agenda.

But it also signals something far more ominous: militant leftist Democraps.

Watch for it.

Hillary and her husband are being destroyed politically as we watch, by the left wing of the Democrap party and their MSM running dogs.

I love it, but Beware the treacherous DNC.They have a leftist socialist agenda, and a candidate planned to foist it on the American people.


213 posted on 09/24/2006 3:59:53 PM PDT by Candor7 (Into Liberal flatulance goes the best hope of the West, and who wants to be a smart feller?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tcrlaf

Well he also said he CONTRACTED people to kill Bin Laden.... a hired gun?????? Geezus! That is DEFINITELY against the law. So - he openly admitted to Chris Wallace on national TV that he broke the law!


214 posted on 09/24/2006 4:00:01 PM PDT by flyingtabby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: truthandlogic; Howlin; onyx; Mo1; Samwise

As evidence of al Qaeda's responsibility for the Cole attack came in during November 2000, National Security Advisor Samuel Berger asked the Pentagon to develop a plan for a sustained air campaign against the Taliban. Clarke developed a paper laying out a formal, specific ultimatum. But Clarke's plan apparently did not advance to formal consideration by the Small Group of principals. We have found no indication that the idea was briefed to the new administration or that Clarke passed his paper to them, although the same team of career officials spanned both administrations.


After the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, evidence accumulated that it had been launched by al Qaeda operatives, but without confirmation that Bin Ladin had given the order. The Taliban had earlier been warned that it would be held responsible for another Bin Ladin attack on the United States. The CIA described its findings as a "preliminary judgment"; President Clinton and his chief advisers told us they were waiting for a conclusion before deciding whether to take military action. The military alternatives remained unappealing to them.


Clinton says this...


"I desperately wish, that I had been president when the FBI and CIA finally confirmed, officially, that bin Laden was responsible for the attack on the U.S.S. Cole. Then we could have launched an attack on Afghanistan early."




In 1998, we learned that Osama bin Laden's organization Al Qaeda was responsible for acts of terrorism against the United States, eventually including "the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, the 1996 killing of 19 US soldiers in Saudi Arabia, and the 1998 bombings in Kenya and Tanzania". In 1999, he was added to the FBI's 10 Most Wanted List.

In 1998, Osama Bin Laden released a fatwa directing Muslims to "kill the Americans and their allies – civilians and military".

As a result of all that, Bill Clinton ordered the assets of Osama Bin Laden frozen in August of 1998. That same month, he also attempted to kill bin Laden via cruise missile attack on an Afghan camp.

Clearly, by 98-99, Clinton had quite a good idea that Osama bin Laden was both responsible for terrorist attacks against the United States and a continuing danger to the United States.

What's more, by late 2000, we did know that Al Qaeda was behind the USS Cole attack. In fact, on page 193 of the 9/11 Commission Report, we find the following:


"the Yemenis provided strong evidence connecting the Cole attack to al Qaeda during the second half of November, identifying individual operatives whom the United States knew were part of al Qaeda. During December, the United States was able to corroborate this evidence. But the United States didn't have evidence of bin Laden's personal involvement in the attacks until Nashiri and Khallad were captured in 2002 and 2003"


So, by November we had strong evidence that it was an al Qaeda operation. By December, we had proof. The only thing we lacked was evidence that Osama bin Laden had personally authorized the attack, and we didn't get that until long after 9/11 had happened.

Of course, Osama bin Laden was the head of al Qaeda whom we'd been trying to kill off and on for a couple years, so it doesn't seem like a difficult deductive leap.


http://tinyurl.com/hsd7m




As Richard Clarke noted in his book (and as contemporary press reports indicated at the time), we knew while Clinton was in office that the USS Cole had been attacked by al-Qaeda.

This was noted by the Center for American Progress (not exactly a right-wing site), when they were reviewing the 9-11 Commission report. Evidently, the Clinton folks knew enough, according to CAP, that "Upon entering office, the Bush administration was specifically told that al Qaeda was responsible for the October 2000 bombing of the USS Cole in Yemen."

This is further confirmed by Clarke’s testimony before the Commission, where he states that, by the close of the Clinton Administration, they definitively knew that al-Qida had undertaken attacks not only on the Cole, but masterminded WTC-93 and the embassy bombings.


215 posted on 09/24/2006 4:00:15 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: blogblogginaway

Bill Clinton reminds me of how Saddam Hussein acts in the Iraqi court. How can anybody watch that perverted crazed freak who was president for eight years and not realize how much better off we are now?


216 posted on 09/24/2006 4:00:28 PM PDT by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
I watched it this morning. I am watching Meet the Depressed. Tim Russert is throwing one softball question after another at Billy Jeff

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

"Surprised?"

217 posted on 09/24/2006 4:00:36 PM PDT by Christian4Bush ("Ma'am, you don't have to thank us. You just go beat him for us." Soldier to Irey re: Murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: oceanview

...and points his finger in Wallace's leg.


218 posted on 09/24/2006 4:00:50 PM PDT by rambo316 (Social engineering does not work and never will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rightwingintelligentsia

Brit is the best. The problem is, as soon as he signs off the lefties come on. All 'Fair And Balanced' ya know.


219 posted on 09/24/2006 4:02:18 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

>I really liked how he kept claiming people said he was too fixated on OBL.... <

Not half as much as he was fixated on Rush Limbaugh and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.


220 posted on 09/24/2006 4:02:18 PM PDT by Darnright (http://media.putfile.com/Webb-on-Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 541-547 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson