Putting his brief case in his vehicle while waiting for the vehicle blocking his car to be moved.
Posted on 09/25/2006 2:33:34 PM PDT by doug from upland
A very short hearing was held this morning in the historic civil case Paul v Clinton, et al. Judge Aurelio Munoz ruled that depositions cannot go forward until the appeal is settled regarding his April decision to remove Hillary as a defendant.
As usual, despite notification to most of the mainstream sources in Los Angeles, there was no media in the courtroom.
It was after the hearing when the fun began. A new toy came on Saturday -- a SONY Digital 8 movie cam. What a perfect opportunity to use it. FReeper The Spirit of Allegiance was the cam operator. When I get the software loaded and figure it out, we will have some video highlights for you.
After the hearing, we waited outside to grill him. There were two ways he could have left the building, so it was quite a challenge to keep track of both. Then, we spotted him and ran to catch up with him after he exited the building. At first, we thought he was going to grab a cab at the corner. Fortunately, he did not. He had a rental car.
As TSOA was messing with the camera, Kendall made a right turn toward his parking lot. TSOA walked straight, and I had to yell at him. He ran quickly to catch up. I was only a few paces behind Kendall.
I greeted Mr. Kendall. He greeted me back. When I asked about Hillary's four fraudulent FEC filings, he said, "I hate to be rude, but I have no comment." I replied that he was being rude and it was about time he was answering some questions.
Then the camera was in place and rolling. And here is where Divine Providence came into play. Kendall's rental vehicle was a cute light blue Chevrolet HHR. Unfortunately for him, he was blocked by another vehicle. While the attendants were getting the keys to move it, we pounded away with questions, which, of course he wouldn't answer. TSOA got some good footage of his really pained look. He was trapped with no where to go. It was almost unfair. Naw.
Among the questions were why Hillary has filed four false FEC reports...why she won't identify the name of her largest contributor...why he deceived the public for five years by claiming the case had no merit.
This lying weasel was finally asked a series of questions that the MSM has refused to ask him.
On and off camera, here was the inquisiton:
-- Why did you stop commenting to the media that NY Senate 2000 filed proper FEC filings? That's what you said for five years.
-- Why did Hillary Clinton tell the FBI and FEC that she knew nothing about Peter Paul's contributions?
-- Why do you say Hillary and Bill have cooperated fully in all the investigations about Peter Paul's contributions? They didnt know they convinced Paul to make the contributions that were never reported?
-- Why does Hillary Clinton still refuse to admit Peter Paul was her biggest contributor in 2000?
-- Why did Hillary suddenly report in January, 2006 that Stan Lee donated $225,000 to her campaign for Event 39 when he swears he didnt give her anything?
-- Are lawyers in Washington allowed to make up quotes of opposing parties to defend their clients?
-- Why do you continue to say that Peter Paul's suit is meritless after the California Supreme Court denied your objections in 2004?
On camera, when he continued to refuse to answer, I asked him if we were going to have to use a cardboard cutout of him to get the answers.
After he finally got into his car, I thanked him and told him it's been fun. He actually said thank you.
We'll have the shots for you as soon as possible. It was truly an entertaining FReep. Some of the footage will make the documentary film. We are trying to get a short version done before the November election. There have been so many challenges to overcome.
Hillary could have solved this problem five years ago. All she had to do was file an accurate report in July of 2001, when she had all of the documentation necessary to file the report. But she chose to continue lying. That is how the Clintons always do it.
Had Hillary filed properly on her third try, she would not have had to file a fourth fraudulent FEC report in January 2006. And David Rosen would have never had to face a criminal trial last mean. Although he deserved it for his role in the conspiracy, he would have never faced any of the grief.
Bill Clinton learned a lesson about Paul Jones. He should have admitted what he did and apologized. Hillary is going to learn a lesson from this.
Doug, you are an AWESOME FReeper, and a great American Patriot as well.
Cheers to you buddy, and BUMP TO THE TOP!
My take is the MSM is afraid to report "fairly" on The Clinton's.. even most conservatives seem afraid to report everything on them, including Sean Hannity... I've heard Doug call his show in the past and Sean gets very nervous.
Kendall 3
He can't stand it anymore. When the h*ll are they going to get that car moved so I can get out of here? This guy stalking me is nuts!(he didn't say that.....those were his thoughts)
Good grief. That FReeper needs a haircut. His wife was right.
Yoo Hoo, over here!
Fantastic report, looking fwd to the video...
She may win the appeal and be removed. It doesn't matter. Bill is still a defendant, and she is going to testify. The judge made it clear in April that he would entertain no motions from Kendall to prevent her deposition. She had Kendall file with the court a totally phony declaration. The voters will soon see.
Peter has home video of Hillary at the events. In her deposition she claimed that she might have spoken to him at one or both of the events (Spago lunch and Gershman tea) but couldn't remember anything they discussed. In fact, at Spago they sat next to each other for an hour and a half. He has her on tape talking about how she doesn't use email anymore because it would be subpoenaed. She is not going to get away with claiming she has no recollection. She told Stan Lee he was a genius for hiring Peter. She knew he was smart before but now he was in the stratosphere.
At the Gershman tea, he is standing behind where she is sitting to introduce her. He introduces discusses Winter Carnival at Dartmouth. A friend of his had a blind date with her back in the early 1970s. She gets a big laugh when she turns and says for him not to tell everything. She doesn't remember that?
Are you doing depositions of staff related to the Clintons who are their handlers, note takers, organizers and secretaries?
Peter wanted to get a photo of Fabio holding her in a romance pose. She was worried that he would hurt his back. Peter really insisted, so Fabio chased her around the room. She parked her butt on the rug, thinking that it would discourage him. Nope. Fabio put his hand under her butt and picked her up. The next year, Bill spoke at the same dinner and said Hillary couldn't make it because she was still in shock over Fabio picking her up the previous year.
Peter has a home video of Hillary at Zev Braun's early in 2000. On tape she laughs loud and says "I loved that!" They were talking about that Fabio incident. They then talk about Amazon roses. Peter sent her a bunch of those trying to entice her to give him the Fabio photo as she had promised.
They had extensive contact. She is not going to get away with claiming she barely knew him. The home videos are killer evidence.
Thanks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.