Posted on 09/26/2006 4:18:43 PM PDT by Jay777
Who's to say that the Dims will be around forever? In my opinion the once-great Democratic Party is committing suicide, through its behavior since the barking moonbats took over. If they're still around as a national party after 2010, it will be because some spineless Republicans allowed them to win, or otherwise threw them a line.
In Seminole County, Florida, where I lived until recently, the Dims are already a third party; since 1996 the typical local race has pitted a Republican against an Independent, or a Republican against a Libertarian.
Plenty of districts offer up only token Republican opposition to the Dim machine, after all.
You're dreaming if you think that there will ever be a day when Republicans are the only active political party. If the Democratic Party ceases to be, another left party will rise up in its place.
And whatever power you give the Republicans now to go after its opposition, you are also giving that lefty party in the future to come after us. Remember that.
You do realize, don't you, that all this bill does is slow the flow of tax dollars to this organization.
Of course I realize it. The proper response to them is tort reform.
I'm only concerned about how a Dim Congress will use this precedent to go after conservative organizations in the future. An overall tort reform can't be abused in the same way, because it doesn't go after specific organizations.
Neither does this, it is applied to everyone across the board including Conservative legal groups. It really doesn't bother the Conservative legal groups because they don't file Establishment Clause cases very often and feel if it is really worth filing one then they are willing to foot the costs to win it. It is the Conservative legal groups that helped push this bill.
It is the Conservative legal groups that helped push this bill.
More's the pity.
Still doesn't change the fact that instead of real tort reform, we get this reform targeted at the tactics of one organization, opening a Pandora's box of additional federal legislation aimed at groups out of favor.
It's still a tactic that could be turned against us some day, and it's still not necessary if Congress would enact tort reform instead of playing these political games.
It doesn't stand a chance in the Senate, but this will make great campaign fodder. Who ever thought it up is a sharp strategist.
Don't rain on the parade man! If enough people speak up this can pass the Senate.
It would ne nice, but alas Collins, Snow, Chaffee, Specter, Warner et. al. are not known for listening to their mainstream Republican constituents.
It's still a great day. We now have most of the rats on record as voting for public funding of the ACLU.
I think that's true; as a national party, the Dhimmicrats will remain around for quite some time, but then, the late Gus Hall's party (for example) is still on the ballot because there are just enough active members to get them on there. I think that 2010 is optimistic, but that's the date of the next midterm elections, so you may be correct.
The fragmentation that is going on isn't just among the Dhimmicrats, but the Pubbies are accumulating the middle of the road voters, and the road ahead bends to the right. Let the leftists splinter, or better yet, gain control of the other party (which was never a homogeneous whole).
bttt
This is a huge victory for the American taxpayer; the ACLU will no longer be able to play their game of obtaining federal funding via the awarding of legal fees when they "win" cases.
If you would like them to continue receiving dollars from you, feel free to send the ACLU a donation. They still have the right to exist and to receive voluntary funding, but will no longer receive involuntary funding.
I agree this is great news, and thanks for the ping.
Now, if we could get funding for PBS, the NEA and the NEH cut.
. . . . .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.