Replies

Yes you did. You cherry picked that sentence from a discussion I'm having with another...dishonest of you, to say the least.

You are a real blow-hard. I went back to the post of which you claim I took you out of context - you are so full of it - I quoted the entire paragraph.

Lets review:

#160

mugs99: "I'm a Deist. We are agnostics. We believe that the question of God's existence isn't answerable. To answer the question of God's existence would require proof. Do you have that proof?"

LVD: "God by definition is a matter of faith - I think you are barking up the wrong tree"

If sure looks like you are the one being dishonest because I clearly did not take your statement out of context.

You are a real blow-hard. I went back to the post of which you claim I took you out of context - you are so full of it - I quoted the entire paragraph.
Lets review:
#160
mugs99: "I'm a Deist. We are agnostics. We believe that the question of God's existence isn't answerable. To answer the question of God's existence would require proof. Do you have that proof?"

ROFL!
You tell me that you didn't take it out of context then you make this asinine post showing that you did take it out of context!
CONTEXT:
Luka_Brazi: "Deists believe that a creator created the world, set it in motion, and then stepped back. The deist's God is not a personal God. They are not agnostics though; agnostics believe that it is not possible to know if there is or isn't a God".
Mugs99: Lol!
Your dodging. You said: "He was an agnostic, not a Unitarian, meaning he didn't think the question of God's existence was answerable." You went from not answerable to not possible. In any case, Darwin believed in intelligent design and evolution.

"I am inclined to look at everything as resulting from designed laws, with the details, whether good or bad, left to the working out of what we may call chance."... Charles Darwin
That is the way all Deists look at everything.

I'm a Deist. We are agnostics. We believe that the question of God's existence isn't answerable. To answer the question of God's existence would require proof. Do you have that proof?

The context is Luka_Brazi's attempt to define a Deist to refute the possibility that Darwin was a Deist. My reply that God's existence isn't answerable is a direct reference to the previous post and quote...And my statement stands. To answer the question of God's existence would require proof. Darwin can not answer the question. I can not answer the question. You can not answer the question, unless you have proof...Do you?
.