Skip to comments.
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
The Drudge Report ^
| 10-04-06
| Drudge
Posted on 10/04/2006 5:12:16 PM PDT by jrooney
A posting of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has apparently exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser...
ABC RELEASED TRANSCRIPT OF ONE CHAT BETWEEN FOLEY AND A MAN WHO WAS 18 AT THE TIME OF THE INSTANT MESSAGE EXCHANGE.... NETWORK STATED THE MESSAGE WAS TO 'UNDER AGE' TEEN... DEVELOPING...
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 200601; 20061107; 4thestate5thcolumn; abcdisney; aravosis; barbaramikulski; biasmeanslayoffs; billburton; boycottdisney; brianrosssucks; burton; byebyedems; cuespookymusic; disneynews; distortion; drivebymedia; election; enemedia; fakebutaccurate; foley; foleygate; hitandrunjournalism; homosexualactivist; homosexualagenda; johnaravosis; liberalmedia; mediabias; mediajihad; mediawar; mikerogers; mikulski; mslm; msm; phoneylibscandal298; powerghraib; rogers; smearcampaign; targetlist; thailand; trysellingthetruth; waltsrotatingcorpse; yellowjournalism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
To: jrooney; All
REALITY CHECK The page in question, in the IM, said he was under 18, and wouldnt be 18 until Feb 23.
Xxxxxxxxxx (8:33:29 PM): ya slow things down a little im still young...like under 18
dont want to do anything illegal...im not 18 till feb 23
There simply is no excuse for Foley's behavior and some people around here really need to stop trying to defend him!
161
posted on
10/04/2006 5:39:23 PM PDT
by
Tatze
(This tagline is brought to you by the Admin Moderator!)
To: Billthedrill
ABC is going to have to sue the DNC for giving them false information!
Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters
162
posted on
10/04/2006 5:39:27 PM PDT
by
bray
(Voting for the Rats is a Deathwish)
To: All
Update
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER; FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD Wed Oct 04 2006 20:32:06 ET A posting on ABCNEWS.COM of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser. The website PASSIONATE AMERICA detailed the startling exposure late Wednesday. ABCNEWS said in a statement: "We go to great lengths to prevent the names of alleged sex crime victims from being revealed. On Friday there was a very brief technical glitch on our site which was overridden immediately. It is possible that during that very brief interval a screen name could have been captured. Reviews of the site since then show no unredacted screen names." SEX CHAT WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD On Tuesday ABC news released a high-impact instant message exchange between full-length and, as ABC explained, a young man "under the age of 18." ABC headlined the story: "New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote" But upon reviewing the records, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, the young man was in fact over the age of 18 at the time of the exchange. A network source explains exchanges with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday. MORE...
163
posted on
10/04/2006 5:39:35 PM PDT
by
jrooney
( Hold your cards close.)
To: 1curiousmind
looks like another fitzmas
164
posted on
10/04/2006 5:39:41 PM PDT
by
italianquaker
(Democrats and media can't win elections at least they can win their phony polls.)
To: jrooney
A network source explains exchanges with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday. They lied!
165
posted on
10/04/2006 5:39:43 PM PDT
by
TheConservator
(Confutatis maledictis flammis acribus addictis. . . .)
To: Kermit the Frog Does theWatusi; AZRepublican
AZRepublican wrote: If the guy was 18 then this story is dead.
They can't even get the math right in a homo ephebophile set-up? Don't they have "fact checkers" at DNC headquarters? Where's Geraldo when they really need him?
This is like a Marx Brothers movie. Or maybe The Three Stooges.
To: 1curiousmind
I don't know the facts that say he was 18 at the time of the IMs. Can you spell them out for me?
167
posted on
10/04/2006 5:39:47 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: dcrider182
EIGHTEEN destroys the salacious nature of the story. No sizzle, no sell!
LLS
168
posted on
10/04/2006 5:40:27 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: wouldntbprudent
The facts aren't important. It's the seriousness of the charges! (sarcasm)
169
posted on
10/04/2006 5:40:38 PM PDT
by
airborne
(Show me your friends and I'll show you your future.)
To: jrooney
Didn't the kid write to Foley in one of the IMs that he was going to be 18 on a certain date? I don't get it.
170
posted on
10/04/2006 5:40:39 PM PDT
by
doesnt suffer fools gladly
(I wouldn't vote for a RAT if my life depended on it. Come to think of it, my life does depend on it.)
To: PhiKapMom
No, the young man is presently working as a Deputy Campaign Manager for IStook in OK. They know his age.Know anything about him?
171
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:05 PM PDT
by
TXBubba
( Democrats: If they don't abort you then they will tax you to death.)
To: jrooney
AHA! The plot thickens.
Did Jordan IM with Barney Frank, I wonder? And with the ex-Governor of New Jersey?
172
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:05 PM PDT
by
Palladin
(Log Cabin Republicans have wooden heads.)
To: bnelson44
"claiming isn't proof"
I've well aware of that, which is why I've included all my own disclaimers. I can't vouch for what this blogger claims to have learned and I really don't have the stomach to wade through all of it, but I still think it's worth noting that the facts of the story MIGHT turn out to be different than what's been presented by ABC, etc.
173
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:07 PM PDT
by
Enchante
(There are 3 kinds of lies: Lies, Damned Lies, and the Drive-By Media)
To: Phsstpok
Thanks. Please spell out the facts to me that prove to me he was over 18 at the time of the IMs and I will shut up.
Guys and gals, all I am looking for here is for someone to spell out the facts to me, is that too much to ask for before I start piling on blaim on this kid?
174
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:11 PM PDT
by
bnelson44
(Proud parent of a tanker! (Charlie Mike, son))
To: All
ABC ONLINE GLITCH LEADS TO IDENTITY OF FOLEY ACCUSER
FEATURED IM EXCHANGE WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
Wed Oct 04 2006 20:32:06 ET
A posting on ABCNEWS.COM of an unredacted instant message sessions between Rep. Mark Foley and a former congressional page has exposed the identity of the now 21 year-old accuser.
The website PASSIONATE AMERICA detailed the startling exposure late Wednesday.
ABCNEWS said in a statement: "We go to great lengths to prevent the names of alleged sex crime victims from being revealed. On Friday there was a very brief technical glitch on our site which was overridden immediately. It is possible that during that very brief interval a screen name could have been captured. Reviews of the site since then show no unredacted screen names."
SEX CHAT WAS WITH 18 YEAR OLD
On Tuesday ABC news released a high-impact instant message exchange between full-length and, as ABC explained, a young man "under the age of 18."
ABC headlined the story: "New Foley Instant Messages; Had Internet Sex While Awaiting House Vote"
But upon reviewing the records, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned, the young man was in fact over the age of 18 at the time of the exchange.
A network source explains exchanges with the young man and disgraced former Congressman Foley took place before and after the 18th birthday.
MORE...
175
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:32 PM PDT
by
areafiftyone
(Politicians Are Like Diapers - Both Need To Be Changed Often And For The Same Reason)
To: GeorgiaDawg32
"I'm going to put my hazmat suit on and wander over to the DU to see how they're now going to continue bashing this act between CONSENTING adults..ROFL.. " Be careful over there it has been known to scar one for life. LOL!
To: Tatze
So according to the chat, the page was born Feb 23, 1985- what is Foley accuser's birthdate and when exactly did the IM's take place. I looked at that website and couldn't make it out either.
177
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:45 PM PDT
by
LWalk18
To: Smartaleck
Why don't you post the article at passionateamerica.blogspot.com you found as the breaking news story on this pages age?
To: jrooney
So the headline is: "Queer Republican has phone sex with consenting adult."
That may be news, but as the dems say, it is their personal business.
179
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:51 PM PDT
by
Prost1
(Fair and Unbiased as always!)
To: doesnt suffer fools gladly
He lied in telling him that?
My guess.
Time stamps will tell.
180
posted on
10/04/2006 5:41:53 PM PDT
by
Jet Jaguar
("Being nice will get us killed")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 1,401-1,409 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson