Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: bnelson44

Now you are deliberately twisting words. You know darn well that that post wasn't saying that it was OK for him to break the law for only a few weeks. The post was obviously pointing to the fact that the sexual messages, which were made quite a few months into the year, occured AFTER HIS BIRTHDAY which was only a few weeks into the year!

That does it. It is pointless talking to you anymore. You have been told, time and again, that the messages that could possibly make this illegal, were sent AFTER his birthday. There are timestamps on the freaking IMs. If screen caps and timestamps don't do it for you, then nothing will. You can continue your game with others who will fall for it.


457 posted on 10/04/2006 6:29:49 PM PDT by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 426 | View Replies ]


To: NinoFan

But you still haven't proven anything....

(Running.........)


478 posted on 10/04/2006 6:32:04 PM PDT by misterrob (Bill Clinton, The Wizard of "Is")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 457 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson