Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Another attack on Allen but I have no idea whether it's important or potentially damaging.
1 posted on 10/09/2006 1:18:17 PM PDT by Gone GF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Gone GF
I think they blew it. They threw so much slime at him people are just tuning this noise out now. They might of gotten away with it if they had went with this and left all the race baiting out of it. Now it just more wacko posturing from the Webbies.
2 posted on 10/09/2006 1:20:25 PM PDT by MNJohnnie (Evil Dooer, Snowflake, Conservative Fundamentalist Bush Bot Dittohead reporting for duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF
If you don't think there is any MSM bias, just take a look at this race. Every day there is something about Allen coming out no matter how inane. Yet Webb is squeaky clean.

This is complete and utter BS. I live in Texas and I'm pissed. I'd be dead if I lived in Virginia.

3 posted on 10/09/2006 1:21:04 PM PDT by Bigoleelephant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

They are out there investigating the dem just as hard. Not.


4 posted on 10/09/2006 1:22:10 PM PDT by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

Boy, Allen must really be a threat. Every single day they dish out more dirt on him. Makes me think I'd better vote for him.


6 posted on 10/09/2006 1:31:05 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

It's not important. The stock options are nearly worthless and worth well below the original value. This is another Democratic sleaze machine attack story with no there, there.


15 posted on 10/09/2006 1:42:23 PM PDT by MikeA (Foley has resigned. Bin Laden has not. That is what 's at stake in this election, not some pervert.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

This race is over. Allen by 12.


19 posted on 10/09/2006 1:49:09 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

well all things considered, Allen said he paid more for the stock than what was current value, and was therefore no violation.....


20 posted on 10/09/2006 1:50:21 PM PDT by vin-one (REMEMBER the WTC !!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF
An attack it is. If it has any factual basis, that's on Allen. If it is fact based, and if those facts come out prior to the election, it may not affect Allen's election bid, but when combined with the Foley mess, it can drag down Republicans elsewhere in the nation. I'm particularly ticked because California Lt. Governor candidate Tom McClintock could lose his race because of this drag on his party. This isn't about one senatorial race, or a single house seat in Florida.

The Republican Party would do very well to establish their own party ethics arm within their party to keep a constant vigilant eye on their candidates and office holders. Set them on the straight and narrow road when necessary, and weed them out of the party when necessary. Waiting for their opposition, the MSM, a Congressional ethics investigation, or rumor to expose problems is just plain stupid. It's akin to parents that offer up the defense they had no idea what their child was doing in preparation of a crime within their own house. If there are Republicans violating law or ethics, the Party needs to take them to the shed for a whipping, out of sight of prying eyes, or publicly dump them and promote another candidate that makes the grade.
21 posted on 10/09/2006 1:51:02 PM PDT by backtothestreets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

They really are concerned about Allen. Wonder why? Gee, they are "going to win the senate," so this seat shouldn't matter that much.


22 posted on 10/09/2006 1:51:09 PM PDT by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

I have reached a point where I consider any negative report in the DBM about a Republican to be false until conclusively proven otherwise. They have lied way to many times to be taken at face value anymore.


23 posted on 10/09/2006 1:57:49 PM PDT by Bahbah (Shalit, Goldwasser and Regev, we are praying for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

Yawn.


24 posted on 10/09/2006 1:58:01 PM PDT by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF
Obeying the rules only apply to Republicans. Breaking the rules only applies to Democrats.
26 posted on 10/09/2006 2:07:41 PM PDT by b4its2late (I'm not insensitive, I just don't care.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

I am sure the press is going to investigate how Nancy Pelosi became a multimillionaire after she entered politics /sarc


27 posted on 10/09/2006 2:09:38 PM PDT by indcons (This forum needs your financial support too. Please contribute to Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

The AP story is mostly bogus.

Allen had some stock options in companies from when he was a private citizen serving on their boards. In 2000, he filed as part of his senate run I guess. His amended 2000 filing showed all the stock options -- most of which were worthless, but one had a value at that time of about $2000 DOLLARS total. It then became worthless as well.

IN fact, the options are in a company that has been delisted.

Anyway, after 2000 the senate ethics panel said Allen didn't need to report options if they were worthless. Also, the form used to report said you didn't have to report worthless options.

But it turns out the ethics RULES say you should, in case they ever turn around and have value. This is the first Allen heard of this, but he is amending his 2001-2006 to show he owns some worthless stock options in a company that is delisted and likely to disband.

As to the "asking the army to help" -- he sent a form letter to the Army asking them to provide an ANSWER to the company. The Army answer wasn't a good answer for the company, but Allen did nothing more -- so it is false to say he "helped" them, in any way other than performing a constituent service of getting government to respond.

There's no there there, it's just some silly technical stuff.

BTW, some reports say the 3 companies he had stock options in (because he served on their board) were companies he "aided" as governor -- but that is also false.


29 posted on 10/09/2006 2:16:40 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

The Commies down at the DNC have got to be staying awake all night trying to come up with ways to get this seat.


33 posted on 10/09/2006 2:28:55 PM PDT by FlingWingFlyer ("Today we march, tomorrow we vote!" The illegal aliens won't be "staying home" on Nov. 7th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

They're drumming up another scandal I see. Funny how we don't hear much in the national news about Menendez.


34 posted on 10/09/2006 2:30:54 PM PDT by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

Well, considering he recieved them BEFORE entering the Senate, reported them then, even though he had recieved them PRIOR to being elected.

More smoke and mirrors from the Dims


40 posted on 10/09/2006 3:35:22 PM PDT by Salgak (Acme Lasers presents: The Energizer Border: I dare you to try and cross it. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Gone GF

Well, I am one vote that Allen is getting, no matter what the media says.


42 posted on 10/09/2006 3:48:15 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson