Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerLikesRooster

The theory that the NKers merely set off 500 tonnes of conventional explosive is looking better and better ...


12 posted on 10/10/2006 3:56:25 AM PDT by agere_contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: agere_contra

Do you have a programme to convert tonnes to metres?


62 posted on 10/10/2006 9:33:56 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (The hallmark of a crackpot conspiracy theory is that it expands to include countervailing evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra

One problem with that theory is the volume. We would have seen all that material being moved to the test site with our eyes in the sky.


74 posted on 10/10/2006 3:20:21 PM PDT by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: agere_contra

That's my thinking too. Without sniffing the radiation evidence, Kim must be thinking he can use a large conventional blast dubbed "nuclear" as a bargaining chip to get the US to concede to negotiations and folk like Richardson are eating it up.

Without an explosion going "critical", all they can develop is the equivalent of a dirty bomb. A strong blast? Yes. Thermo-nuclear? Not today.

The fact they're so naive thinking the international community can't tell if it's nuclear or conventional is a sure sign of NK's isolation and ignorance of the matter.


86 posted on 10/10/2006 6:31:41 PM PDT by azhenfud (an enigma between two parentheses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson