Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush says U.S. won't attack North Korea (PUKE - Annan urged US hold one-on-one talks)
yahoo.com ^ | 10/11/06 - 9 minutes ago | By TERENCE HUNT, AP White House Correspondent

Posted on 10/11/2006 8:45:41 AM PDT by excludethis

WASHINGTON - President Bush called Wednesday for stiff sanctions on North Korea for its reported nuclear test and asserted that the United States has "no intentions of attacking" the reclusive regime.

In a Rose Garden news conference, Bush said the United States remains committed to diplomacy, but also "reserves all options to defend our friends in the region."

He also vowed increased military cooperation with allies, including bolstering ballistic missile defenses in the region and increased efforts to prevent Pyongyang from importing missile and nuclear technology.

As Bush spoke, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the United States to hold one-on-one talks with North Korea, something the U.S. has refused to do.

Bush rejected criticism from Democrats that his administration had not paid enough attention to the brewing North Korean nuclear crisis, saying that Pyongyang had turned its back on a 1994 deal negotiated by the Clinton administration.

"It is the intransigence of the North Korean leader, Kim Jong Il, that led to the current situation, he said.

On Iraq, Bush acknowledged "tough times" in the wartorn country where sectarian violence has surged recently. But, he added, "It is in our interests that Iraq succeed."

Bush staunchly defended his Iraq policy, saying that he had adjusted tactics to reflect changing conditions on the ground.

He was asked about a recent comment by the Republican chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sen. John Warner (news, bio, voting record), that Iraq was drifting "sideways" and that the U.S. should consider major changes if Baghdad doesn't get the violence under control within the next few months.

"I appreciate Sen. Warner from going over there and taking a look," said Bush. "I completely agree."

Still, he insisted, "We're constantly changing tactics."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 10/11/2006 8:45:43 AM PDT by excludethis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Yes, obviously the best way to deter your enemies is to give them exactly what they want...


2 posted on 10/11/2006 8:46:19 AM PDT by linear (Taxonomy is a willing and pliant mistress but Reality waits at home, sharpening her knife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Annan is an idiot of course.


3 posted on 10/11/2006 8:49:09 AM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Annan is conducting "diplomatic jihad" against America as he always has......pondering his relevance, I wonder if when he goes home to Ghana he will advocate the use of toilet paper?


4 posted on 10/11/2006 8:51:06 AM PDT by Vn_survivor_67-68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I think he's trying to do it as diplomatically as possible, without doing something serious that will cause Ms. Kim to throw a tantrum and start chucking rockets at Seoul and Tokyo. When that happens... well, let's just say it won't be pretty.


5 posted on 10/11/2006 8:51:37 AM PDT by wastedyears ("By failing to prepare, you are preparing to fail." - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Theres nothing surprising about this. The only way that there will be military action is if NK launches an attack first.


6 posted on 10/11/2006 8:59:21 AM PDT by maquiladora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Maybe we should just ignore 'em. Something to the effect of:
"The gub'mint of North Korea has failed to negotiate in good faith. We are discontinuing any aid to that benighted nation and will have no further contact with them until they, through extraordinary actions, demonstrate sincere, good intentions."
"Until then, let 'em starve and freeze in the dark."


7 posted on 10/11/2006 9:01:04 AM PDT by Little Ray (If you want to be a martyr, we want to martyr you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Bolstering defenses is telling the enemy you have no offense.
Bush is frozen, he should be promising sure and swift destruction of North Korea.
Kicking Annan and his gang of goons out of New York.
Withdrawing all diplomats and letting other countries deal with meanfaced angry Air Force and Army Generals.
Im sick of all this crap.


8 posted on 10/11/2006 9:01:26 AM PDT by claptrap (optional tag-line under reconsideration)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain

Hey Kofi.........screw you.


9 posted on 10/11/2006 9:03:53 AM PDT by newcthem (Brought to you by the INFIDEL PARTY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

I really don't think it would be wise for our President to come out and disclose a all out war or even a threat of it, with NK at a " news conference" . A war of this nature would be well underway before we would have a press conference announcing it!!......I would expect if this is the case, President Bush would come out and just make a statement. " We are dropping bombs as I speak"!!!!


10 posted on 10/11/2006 9:04:51 AM PDT by pollywog (Psalm 44:5 "Put your HOPE in God, for I will yet praise Him, my Savior and my God.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

Maybe Koffi Annan should hold 1 on 1 talks with N. Korea.

ROTFLMAO!


11 posted on 10/11/2006 9:06:16 AM PDT by roaddog727
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The only way that there will be military action is if NK launches an attack first.

North Korea has supplied causus belli for using reactors we allowed to produce fissile material.

12 posted on 10/11/2006 9:07:29 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (There are people in power who are truly evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maquiladora
The only way that there will be military action is if NK launches an attack first.

Bingo....you are correct, and I wish you weren't.

13 posted on 10/11/2006 9:10:11 AM PDT by From One - Many (Trust the Old Media At Your Own Risk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: linear

Actually, and this may sound ridiculous, is they are making plans to ban all booze imports to this freggin` midget. Kim Menatlly Il if you haven`t heard is a raging alcholic, he spends over half a million a year on booze, and to suddenly cut him off is going to drive him into seizures. This is why he declared a ban on imports "a declaration of war"...There was a story in the NY Post yesterday about this guy and his booze, he drinks 14 glasses of wine in one sitting, goes through cases of Cognac, I mean imagine cutting off a Kennedy, it would kill them.


14 posted on 10/11/2006 9:12:34 AM PDT by Screamname (LET`S GO METS!!! LET`S GO METS! LET`S GO METS! LET`S GO METS!!! LET`S GO METS! LET`S GO METS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
As Bush spoke, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the United States to hold one-on-one talks with North Korea, something the U.S. has refused to do.

What a fool. Why don't we just disband the U.N. if countries are supposed to have one-on-one talks.

15 posted on 10/11/2006 9:12:52 AM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

When DOES Annan leave?


16 posted on 10/11/2006 9:13:28 AM PDT by AliVeritas (Gay democrats... you are about to go the way of blacks for illegals votes... your party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

"U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the United States to hold one-on-one talks with North Korea"

Kofi needs to show his financing docs or shut the hell up. He needs to have a one-on-one talks with an IRS agent and Assistant Attorney General.


17 posted on 10/11/2006 9:14:39 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet ("If not now, when?" "Because it's judgment that defeats us.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis

And do we really expect the President to telegraph his every move?


18 posted on 10/11/2006 9:15:35 AM PDT by conservativecorner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
It's not our job Annan! It is all the SC's job to hold NK to honor their previous agreements. STFU Annan!
19 posted on 10/11/2006 9:19:24 AM PDT by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: excludethis
The safest approach to anything said by Kofi Annan is that the truth is the opposite of what he says. It may also be corrupt, dishonest, and immoral. And it will always be presented in a fog of nice-sounding words.

Did I miss anything?

Congressman Billybob

Latest article: "An Open Letter to President Bollinger"

Please see my most recent new statement on running for Congress, here.

20 posted on 10/11/2006 9:21:12 AM PDT by Congressman Billybob (Have a look-see. Please get involved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson