Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rface
"This story is simple. In 1998, Reid bought land. In 2004, he sold it. For the six years in between, he told everyone — including Congress — that he owned the land."

Uh no Max. It's not "that simple".

  1. He sold the land for zero gain.
  2. However he basically sold it to himself (partnership)
  3. When he 1st owned it it was zoned residential.
  4. After he sold it 'to himself' the land was REZONED commercial. That make the land much more valuable.
  5. The rezoning attempt by the 'new owner' was at first refused.
  6. Upon appeal, the rezoning was only approved AFTER it was made perfectly clear to the zoning board that one of the owners (Partners) was - Senator Harry Reid.
  7. It was also made crystal clear that with Senator Reid as part owner, rezoning it commercial would (hint hint) be better for all concerned (no veiled threat there).
  8. Only then was the rezoning approved.
  9. Ar that point said land is sold and Dingy Harry pockets a $700K profit.
  10. There's also the tiny, legal point that said sale to himself with this alleged partnership was not in writing. Which is NOT how real estate transactions are done - unless you're trying to pull something.
So Max that's how I understand it, and it sure ain't 'that simple'.

(btw Max, wanna play some ball today? We need a 3rd base.)

42 posted on 10/17/2006 7:15:28 AM PDT by Condor51 ("Alot" is NOT a word and doesn't mean "many". It is 'a lot', two separate words.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Condor51
As I understand it Reid transfered his asset with a book value of $400,000 to an entity in partnership with JAY H; BROWN.

Does anyone know what is being reported as to what assets this entity had at that time? I assume Brown must have contributed something into the entity prior to the donation by Reid. I also assume Brown must have paid for the permitting of the land that Reid previously owned.

Does anyone know if the partnership still exists and if it currently has assets. I am not an accountant but I assume it must have had preexisting assets if Reid acquired an interest equal to the value of the land and I assume this was done as a tax free exchange for both parties which would mean assets still exist.

61 posted on 10/17/2006 8:10:41 AM PDT by JIM O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson