[Junior]

So you're saying the treaty lied and yet Congress ratified it and the president signed it?

[Elsie]

So you're saying the treaty lied and yet Congress ratified it and the president signed it?

like this has never HAPPENED before? (or since?)

[Elsie]

So you're saying the treaty lied and yet Congress ratified it and the president signed it?

like this one treaty somehow trumps ALL the documents written that founded this Nation?

[Just mythoughts]

Why on earth would there even be a question about this government way back in 1796 being 'Christian'? There had to be a concern for it to be required writing in a treaty that the 'government' was not a Christian government.

So obviously since a diplomat wrote the language and he was the one who was dealing with the 'Mussulmen' knew they would not sign a treaty without the explicit words that the US government was not pushing Christianity on the Mussulmen.

England on the other hand was a monarchy and the monarch's duty was and is protector of the Faith. US was/is NOT a monarchy. That is NOT disputing that fact that the Constitution is very Biblical, especially that part where rights endowed by the Creator no man/government can take.

Those words set this nation apart from all other nations, which is what liberalism seeks to replace themselves as giver and taker of 'rights'.