But I'm more suspicious of the tale than of the alleged fact..
I must be not qualified since I presently am wondering who was the parents of the third human on this planet..
You're thinking there was some "poof" event and there was a "first human." What are the odds of that?
That is why you need to take a look at the actual evidence. The millions of facts, in these journals and elsewhere, lay the foundation for the theory of evolution. The theory must account for the facts. Once you are able to understand the facts underlying the theory, you will have an appreciation of the degree to which the theory either does, or does not, flow from those facts.
Folks are not just making this up out of thin air. There really is a huge amount of data out there. Ichny posts some of it occasionally, but there is so much that it is hard to grasp sometimes. And what he posts is only the tip of the iceberg.
I must be not qualified since I presently am wondering who was the parents of the third human on this planet..
Sorry, not my department.