Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How I Came to Love the Veil
The Washington Post ^ | October 22, 2006 | Yvonne Ridley

Posted on 10/23/2006 2:35:38 PM PDT by HitmanLV

I used to look at veiled women as quiet, oppressed creatures -- until I was captured by the Taliban. In September 2001, just 15 days after the terrorist attacks on the United States, I snuck into Afghanistan, clad in a head-to-toe blue burqa, intending to write a newspaper account of life under the repressive regime. Instead, I was discovered, arrested and detained for 10 days. I spat and swore at my captors; they called me a "bad" woman but let me go after I promised to read the Koran and study Islam. (Frankly, I'm not sure who was happier when I was freed -- they or I.)

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: hijab; islam; rop; veil
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last
An absolutely nutty article by a recent convert to Islam. She sees the veil (actually, I prefer the word 'mask') as a sign on how much better women have it in the Arab-Islamic world.

This must be read to be believed.

1 posted on 10/23/2006 2:35:39 PM PDT by HitmanLV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul

This article is NUTS!!!


2 posted on 10/23/2006 2:36:16 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Wow. Classic Stockholm syndrome.


3 posted on 10/23/2006 2:38:30 PM PDT by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Why is she still using her Christian name in her byline?


4 posted on 10/23/2006 2:40:06 PM PDT by saganite (Billions and billions and billions-------and that's just the NASA budget!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

The feminists must be awfully proud. Forty years of toil ... only to find themselves wrapped in eight century veils.


5 posted on 10/23/2006 2:40:15 PM PDT by Elpasser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
She's boasting of being an outspoken woman, yet she rejoices in enslaving herself?

Ya know what I think? That's she's FAT!

6 posted on 10/23/2006 2:40:33 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
This article is absolutely astonishing.
7 posted on 10/23/2006 2:41:12 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Yes, it is a religious obligation for Muslim women to dress modestly, but the majority of Muslim women I know like wearing the hijab, which leaves the face uncovered, though a few prefer the nikab. It is a personal statement: My dress tells you that I am a Muslim and that I expect to be treated respectfully, much as a Wall Street banker would say that a business suit defines him as an executive to be taken seriously. And, especially among converts to the faith like me, the attention of men who confront women with inappropriate, leering behavior is not tolerable.
It's a doozy all right.
8 posted on 10/23/2006 2:41:21 PM PDT by AnnaZ (I think so, Brain, but if we give peas a chance, won't the lima beans feel left out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul; ThinkDifferent; AnnaZ; Elpasser; saganite
The Washington Post (probably unintentionally) ran 'Clothes Aren't the Issue' the same day. It makes a lot more sense, and (surprise!) authored by a woman actually born & raised in an Arab-Islamic culture!
9 posted on 10/23/2006 2:45:45 PM PDT by HitmanLV ("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do succeed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Mental derrangement brought about by distress and trauma.


10 posted on 10/23/2006 2:47:40 PM PDT by Dead Corpse (Well, my days of not taking your seriously are certainly coming to a middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

What a load. She had a history with the religion beforehand anyhow. Sounds like she was fixated on it. A real nutcase. Check out Wiki:



[edit] Marriage and children
Ridley had one daughter, Daisy (born 1992), with her first husband, Daoud Zaaroura, who "was a PLO colonel when Ridley met him in Cyprus" [1]. The couple are now divorced. Her third husband was Ilan Roni Hermosh[2], to whom she was married until 1999.


11 posted on 10/23/2006 2:48:23 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (In God we trust. All others we monitor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

I think this woman was fired from Al Jazeera because she was too much of an extremist for them. not kidding.


12 posted on 10/23/2006 2:48:43 PM PDT by Eurotwit (WI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: gaijin
Methinks that the western wholehearted abandonment of slavery may not be as good as it is presented. It appears to me that there is a certain percentage of the population that craves ... nay, even requires the collar and enslavement in order to fulfill some self imposed fantasy or view of the world.
13 posted on 10/23/2006 2:49:15 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

Now, I know why feminists have been quiet on this issue. Now, it makes sense. I suspected it all along, but now, I GET IT. They don't believe girls were denied education in Afganistan or have been taken advantage of by fathers, brothers, uncles, etc. I GET IT, IT GET IT. I feel so much better. I was beginning to think up was down and right was left. It all makes perfect sense.


14 posted on 10/23/2006 2:49:39 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Hmmmmmm........on her I think the veil is an improvement. Don't discourage her!!!


15 posted on 10/23/2006 2:50:38 PM PDT by daylate-dollarshort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
"If a man does raise a finger against his wife, he is not allowed to leave a mark on her body, which is the Koran's way of saying, "Don't beat your wife, stupid."

So beating is ok, just not bruising?

16 posted on 10/23/2006 2:50:52 PM PDT by dano1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV

I see that it was published 10/22/06, but I'd swear I've seen this before. She was in the Taliban's hands some 5 years ago...


17 posted on 10/23/2006 2:52:27 PM PDT by Ready4Freddy ("Everyone knows there's a difference between Muslims and terrorists. No one knows what it is, tho...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dano1

Doesn't stoning a woman to death leave a mark?


18 posted on 10/23/2006 2:54:03 PM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HitmanLV
Before and after:

But it makes sense in that she is a member of Galoway's wacko "Respect" party.

19 posted on 10/23/2006 2:54:28 PM PDT by omniscient
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gaijin

Fat, liberal, and stupid is no way to go through life.





20 posted on 10/23/2006 2:55:43 PM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson