Michael J. Fox is a cannibal

http://www.worldnetdaily.com ^ | 10 25 06 | Jill Staneck

[diamond6]

Boy she hit the nail on the head.

[gridlock]

I don't remember if he actually used "embryonic" stem cell research. You can used just stem cells that are not "embryonic". Maybe that's what Michael was referring to? Or not. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

You're wrong.

Michael J. Fox never said the word "embryonic", but he was referring to existing and proposed restrictions on embryonic stem cell research. His did not use the term because he is trying to obscure the issue, and the Democrats know that if the word "embryonic" is used, they lose a lot of votes. But if he is not talking about embryonic stem cell research, then his statements make no sense at all.

[dead]

I don't remember if he actually used "embryonic" stem cell research. You can used just stem cells that are not "embryonic". Maybe that's what Michael was referring to? Or not. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

Non-embryonic stem cell research is not controversial and receives a lot of federal funding. Michael J. Fox is talking specifically about fetal stem cell research, whether he uses the word or not.

Liberals like to confuse the two so they can wrap conservative’s objections to fetal stem cell research (which has produced not a single treatment for anything) with the perfectly acceptable (and currently productive) use of adult stem cells for treatment.

[jackibutterfly]

"I don't respect him a bit, the whole shaking thing was just a big act for the cameras, after all - acting is his career. "

Me either - did you notice that he wasn't as much shaking, but rocking from side to side when he talked. Whenever he took a breath or stopped talking, he wasn't rocking as hard. But when he started talking, he started rocking. Looked forced, to me.

[Last Laugh]

I thought it was just the groups dragging on the gov. teet that cannot use embryonic cells.

That is what liberals are whining about. They want government funding. The government must fund everything.

It seems to me that if MJ Fox was really concerned about Parkinson's and other disease, he'd cough up some of that dough he made making movies and start a private research fund.

Other rich hollywood types could throw in a few thousand to show their concern as well.

[Doctor Stochastic]

What a mean spirited sentiment. One can only assume that the Democrats are psying the author to make such comments.

[Mrs. Don-o]

I think "embryos" without a modifier could refer to chimp embryos, squid embryos: any embryos. And if we're talking about the production and consumption of human embryos, then "cannibalism" is both species-accurate and rhetorically strong.

[twigs]

Yes, Fox is wrong. But pursuing it will not help Republicans and gives sympathy votes for the Dems. It's why they use the weak to do their dirty work for them. Their ideas don't work, so they have to play on the emotions of their ranks who don't know how to think.

[atlaw]

What a mean spirited sentiment. One can only assume that the Democrats are [paying] the author to make such comments.

Given the level of discourse on display in this thread, I don't think such an assumption is necessary.

[gridlock]

Why are these people so hell-bent on destroying embryos when it hasn't produced results?

Do you really have to be told?

This has nothing to do with embryonic stem cells. It has nothing to do with Parkinsons, Alzheimers or Michael J. Fox. It has nothing to do with curing disease.

It is all about Abortion.

The Donks were tired of having their butts kicked over Partial Birth Abortion, so they moved to debate to the other end of the gestational spectrum. Principled Pro-Lifers could no more accept Embryonic Stem Cell Research than they could Partial Birth Abortion, so they took up the challenge. That is why we are talking about this today.

[tioga]

We have to re-frame the issue......because to run as cowards from the embryonic stem cell issue we are condemning the unborn.

[Old Professer]

The title simply draws on the author's final sentence.

[twigs]

I agree with you. It is a very important issue.

[gridlock]

So the question comes to me why does he not go to the Canadian Parliament and have them commit to doing the stem cell research he wants.

Because you don't make much progress in genetic research by banging two rocks together, and that's all the Canadians have. You won't find the cure for Parkinsons under a Labatt's Blue bottlecap, so no Canadian is likely to find it at all.

But seriously, this is all about Abortion. The whole issue is one giant red herring.

[devolve]

---

I believe [I could be wrong] there is much more trickery involved in the Michael Fox TV ads than Rush Limbaugh and others suspected [deliberate suspension of medication (by a professional actor who just happens to have been a radical liberal activist years before he had Parkinson's Disease) to increase viewer impact and sympathy] by watching the ads.

I see digital editing to increase the "jerkiness" by Michael Fox - by removing many of the frames per second that you see on your TV screen.

The result is you see an animated parody of a human being with Parkinson's Disease.

View the TV ad(s) again and note the way the head and eyes jerk abruptly from place to place without smooth transitional frames - as his voice speaks without missing a beat......

I said that I could be wrong.

But if I remove every other frame from an animated .gif the movements you see will be less smooth and much more jerky.

I realized that Parkinson's Disease does cause erratic shaking and jerking - taking certain medications indeed can reduce this.

But Michael Fox has admitted on TV that he deliberately stopped taking his prescriptions before he appeared before Congress - Fox also does this before appearing before groups to dramatize the actual effects of a victim of Parkinson's Disease.

But if I remove half or more of the frames from an animated .gif image - what you will see is a much more "jerky" animation - the same will happen in any movie or TV tape or digital video.

It's simple.

If as I suspect - That the DNC and Michael Fox have done this - they are not only distorting anf lying - they are committing fraud.

You be the judge.

You don't have to be an expert to spot this.

As I said - I could be wrong - I doubt that I am.

Prove me wrong.

[meyer]

He's just a typical self-serving liberal, trying to gain benefit on the harvesting of the unborn.

[Old Professer]

Embryonic, non embryonic, lab-grown or harvested; it still amounts to walking around the camel's nose.

[dead]

There is absolutely not a single thing morally wrong with adult stem cell research.

[CDHart]

What is a blastocyst?

carolyn

[MHGinTN]

High-tech cannibalism indeed! I've been posing that reality for years, and been poopooed regularly. But it (ESC exploitation) is just that, cannibalism.

Note please the following wise phrasing: "... exploited for their eggs, too, because the only source of these pre-embryos is women." The term 'pre-embryo' became a popular lie of the democrats and their leftist sycophants, to dehumanize embryo aged beings, using the term to identify early aged embryos for exploitation harvesting. IVF tries to make this same lie palitable becase they exploit embryo aged humans all the time.

For any not clear on the stem cell distinctions, click here for a link to a free book for downloading. [AMERICA, WE NEED TO TALK at the following site for links to html or PDF format http://weneedtalk.blogspot.com]