Posted on 11/01/2006 8:09:16 PM PST by Flavius
* Introduction * What kinds of arms does Russia sell to Iran? * What is the history of Russian-Iranian arms sales? * What explains Russias emergence as Irans chief arms supplier? * Do Irans Russian-made arms pose a major security threat? * Does Iran funnel arms from Russia to terrorist groups? * How important is the Iranian market to Russias arms dealers? * How has Moscows arms sales to Iran affected U.S.-Russian relations? * Does Russias arms trade make efforts to sanction Iran more difficult? * What leverage does the U.S. have to limit Russian arms sales to Iran?
Introduction
Last year, Russia surpassed the United States as the developing worlds leader in arms deals, according to a new report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). But Russia has increased military shipments to anti-U.S. states like Iran and Venezuela, not to mention potential adversaries like China, which concerns U.S. policymakers far more. Experts say Iranas well as Syriamay have transferred some of these small arms to groups like Hezbollah and Hamas. Also, Russias arms relationship with Iran, the thinking goes, further complicates efforts to impose punitive sanctions against Tehran for its alleged pursuit of nuclear weapons. What kinds of arms does Russia sell to Iran?
Since 1992, Russia has sold Iran hundreds of major weapons systems, including twenty T-72 tanks, ninety-four air-to-air missiles, and a handful of combat aircraft like the MiG-29. Late last year, Russia agreed to sell Iran a $700 million surface-to-air missile defense system (SA-15 Gauntlet) along with thirty TOR M-1 air-defense missile systems, ostensibly to defend its soon-to-be-complete, Russian-built nuclear reactor at Bushehr. Moscow also plans to upgrade Tehrans Su-24, MiG-29 aircraft, and T-72 battle tanks. Iran has shown interest in S-300 anti-aircraft missiles from Russia and Belarus, which can intercept enemy aircraft ninety to 180 miles away. Michael Eisenstadt, director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policys Military and Security Studies Program, says Iran is building up its naval presence. In April 2006, the Iranians claimed to have tested a high-speed torpedosimilar to the Russian-made VA-111 Shkvalcapable of destroying large warships or submarines. Iran already fields Chinas Silkworm anti-shipping missile and an array of mine technologies. What is the history of Russian-Iranian arms sales?
After the fall of the Shah in 1979, the Islamic Republic of Iran sought to secure itself by purchasing conventional arms mainly from China, North Korea, and, despite prickly bilateral relations, the Soviet Union (under the Shah, its chief supplier had been the United States and Britain). In 1989, following the death of Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, Moscow and Tehran negotiated their first major arms deal along with agreements on scientific-technical cooperation, which included pledges of non-interference in each others domestic affairs. Relations soon improved. By the end of the 1990s, once Irans cooperation with North Korea had slowed, Russia emerged as Irans main supplier of conventional arms. Between 1995 and 2000, Russia suspended its advanced weapons trade with Iran as part of a voluntary agreement with the United States. The value of arms transfer agreements between the Iran and Russia ballooned from $300 million between 1998 and 2001 to $1.7 billion between 2002 and 2005. What explains Russias emergence as Irans chief arms supplier?
Some analysts see a quid pro quo in place: Iran does not object to Russian interference in the predominantly Muslim Caucasus, while Russia refrains from agreeing to UN sanctions against Tehran. However, for both parties, cooperation is driven as much by fear and mistrust as it is by opportunism and shared interests, wrote Eisenstadt in a March 2001 Arms Control Today article. According to Wade Boese, research director of the Arms Control Association, a Washington-based think tank, Russia, like the United States, sees arms sales as a potential means of influence [over its buyers]. Finally, Russias upsurge in arms sales with Iran is part of a concerted move by Moscow to expand its commercial reach to developing markets in the Middle East, Southeast Asia, and Latin America. Do Irans Russian-made arms pose a major security threat?
They could, experts predict. Sales of advanced military equipment to Iran by Russia and others has been an issue of intense interest to U.S. policymakers for some time, writes Richard F. Grimmett, author of the CRS report. Iran appears to be interested in air-defense systems, which would pose a challenge to U.S. combat strikes in Iran, Boese says. Not all experts agree. "Its been a lot more smoke than fire, says Eisenstadt. In terms of Iranian air defenses, [the Iranians are] still pretty weak given the size of the land mass they have to defend. Does Iran funnel arms from Russia to terrorist groups?
Its unclear. During its month-long war with Hezbollah last summer, Israel found Russian-made anti-tank weapons, including RPG-29s, which proved highly effective against Israels Merkava tanks. It was largely the transfer of Irans military technology and its asymmetric capabilities to Hezbollah that made it difficult for the high-tech-oriented Israeli military to eradicate the fighting capabilities of that organization during the thirty-four-day war in July-August, writes Ehsan Ahrari, CEO of Strategic Paradigms, a Virgina-based defense consultancy, in the Asia Times. Most experts, however, say these rocket-propelled grenades were likely transferred to Hezbollah by Syria, not Iran. It is very difficult for those of us looking from the outside to say with any certainty that Iran bought weapons from Russia and sold them to Hezbollah, says Matthew Schroeder, manager of the Federation of American Scientists Arms Sales Monitoring Project. Part of the problem, he says, is that much of Russias weaponry is widely proliferated, meaning that dozens of countries have imported it, and a number of them have produced their own variants, with and without Russias consent. End-user agreements typically prohibit states from transferring arms to third parties; moreover, states are prohibited from funneling arms to Hezbollah by UN Security Council Resolution 1559, passed in 2004. Interestingly, experts point out that a major weakness in Hezbollahs capabilities demonstrated last summer was the groups lack of sophisticated air-defense missiles. How important is the Iranian market to Russias arms dealers?
Not very, experts say, especially when compared to Russias arms sales to China and India, which account for approximately two-thirds of Russias arms shipments (Russia recently completed a deal to sell Beijing thirty Il-76TD transport aircraft and eight aerial refueling tankers, worth more than $1 billion). Although Russia may see Iran as an attractive arms customer, I dont think we should inflate how important this market is to Russia, Boese says. Schroeder agrees that China and India remain Russias most important customers. If they lose them, theyre in trouble, he says, but adds that Russias deals with Iran are pretty significant. Were talking hundreds of millions of dollars. How has Moscows arms sales to Iran affected U.S.-Russian relations?
They have added to already-strained relations, experts say. As the U.S. focuses increasing attention on Irans efforts to enhance its nuclear as well as conventional military capabilities, major arms transfers [from Russia] continue to be a matter of concern [among U.S. policymakers], writes Grimmett in the CRS report. For their part, the Russians claim the arms they sell Iran are used for self-defense. They see the United States as trying to diminish Russian arms sales and marketplace competition, Boese says. The trick from the Russians perspective, adds Eisenstadt, is to strike a balance in their foreign policysupporting an Iran that can tie the U.S. down while not creating a Frankenstein that can threaten their own interests. Does Russias arms trade make efforts to sanction Iran more difficult?
It makes it harder but not impossible, Boese says of efforts to enlist Russian support for sanctions. Moscow clearly has other cooperation with Iran that it sees as much more important than conventional arms sales and there is the general concern about embracing language or actions that could be seen as paving the way for U.S. military action against Iran. The larger issue for Moscow, he adds, is Bushehr and protecting Russias financial stake there. Eisenstadt agrees, while adding that there are more fundamental principles at stake here: the Russians want to delegitimize sanctions as an instrument of international diplomacy because theyve been used against Moscow in the past. What leverage does the U.S. have to limit Russian arms sales to Iran?
Not much. Part of the problem, in general, is there are no legal prohibitions to selling conventional weapons, Boese says, only voluntaryand thereby unenforceableexport-control regimes like the Missile Technology Control Regime or the Wassenaar Arrangement. Russia has come under criticism from the U.S. State Department for its lax compliance with these agreements. On its arms sales to Iran, I imagine behind closed doors there are negotiations in Washington about it, Schroeder says, but adds thatlike U.S. efforts to dissuade Russia from selling arms to Venezuela, including $3 billion of jet fighters and Kalashnikov assault riflesthey are unlikely to succeed. The United States can also sanction Russian entities for their alleged proliferation transactions with Iran. In total, the White House has slapped sanctions on six Russian firms for delivering arms-related materials to Iran, the most recent being Rosoboronexport and Sukoi this past September. Experts say these kinds of sanctions have little impact. Finally, the Russians might be willing to rescind their arms trade with Iran, says Eisenstadt, in exchange for American promises to block NATO expansion eastward and to stop meddling in [Russias] near-abroad, something Washington appears unwilling to do.
That is, unless the party of Jean Francois Kerry convinces America to commit Hari-Kerry.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.