Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New York Times Sat. Front Page: Bleeding U.S. Marine [Shot by Sniper]
New York Times ^ | 11-04-06 | Self

Posted on 11/04/2006 10:40:53 AM PST by mr. mojo risin

Not allowed to post from NYT.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: enemedia; nyslimes; purescum; theenemywithin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101 next last
To: BIGLOOK
Means "Bad Hunter".

ROFLMAO!!! It was worth the keyboard. I love it!

51 posted on 11/04/2006 11:27:03 AM PST by beltfed308 (Democrats :Tough on Taxpayers, Soft on Terrorism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Chena; All
What I'd like to say about the New York Times' editors might also be expressed with a string of four-letter epithets, but I'll keep it clean:

The Times is now run by a group of thirty-something mainly homosexual leftists from Ivy League schools who detest our military and believe the United States is a force for evil in the world. They want our enemies to win because they hate us, too. Toward this end, and in support of the efforts of those who seek to destroy our culture and our society, the Times routinely publishes intelligence data helpful to our enemies and photos of violence against our soldiers designed to sap public support for the war.

By purposefully encouraging hopelessness and despair on the part of the American people and by encouraging the enemy, the behavior of the Times' editors has been both despicable and disloyal. "Treason" has a real meaning, even in these Times, and it is on display for all to see each day on West 43rd Street in Manhattan.

52 posted on 11/04/2006 11:29:26 AM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

Goebbels would be proud. During the last months of WW2, the Germans dropped propaganda pamphlets on Allied troops showing photos of dead soldiers and asking, "Do you want to be the last man to die in the war?"


53 posted on 11/04/2006 11:29:37 AM PST by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zarf

Treadmill? Get used to it. I am a Navy Mom. The people behind this are not sick of it, they are just beginning. The Times just helps them kill us, they do and they will continue to, unless we stop them. Every life is precious, especially the ones who will fight for us. Sacrifice? You bettcha, and these guys do it with no support from those who don't have the guts to fight for it. Sick of it. Yes we are, but we are realy sick of those that aid and abet the enemy.


54 posted on 11/04/2006 11:31:28 AM PST by dforest (be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

Gee, who would have expected that, so close to an election? /UltraMegaGigaGoogleplexSarc


55 posted on 11/04/2006 11:31:51 AM PST by NonValueAdded (Prayers for our patriot brother, 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub. Brian, we're all pulling for you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

Bass turds.


56 posted on 11/04/2006 11:33:29 AM PST by tiredoflaundry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: darkwing104
The slimes deserve to go out of business

At least they are heading in that direction.

57 posted on 11/04/2006 11:34:03 AM PST by EGPWS (Lord help me be the conservative liberals fear I am.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

I sure hope his mom or wife didn't first learn he was wounded from the morning paper.


58 posted on 11/04/2006 11:35:44 AM PST by keats5 (tolerance of intolerant people is cultural suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
The Laughing Terrorist wants home delivery.
59 posted on 11/04/2006 11:36:57 AM PST by SlowBoat407 (A living insult to islam since 1959)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

I hate them, God forgive me, I hate every last one of them, the photographer and editor who chose to run this ...and anyone who decided this was a worthy piece of news.


60 posted on 11/04/2006 11:37:48 AM PST by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
What I'd like to say about the New York Times' editors might also be expressed with a string of four-letter epithets, but I'll keep it clean: The Times is now run by a group of thirty-something mainly homosexual leftists from Ivy League schools who detest our military and believe the United States is a force for evil in the world. They want our enemies to win because they hate us, too. Toward this end, and in support of the efforts of those who seek to destroy our culture and our society, the Times routinely publishes intelligence data helpful to our enemies and photos of violence against our soldiers designed to sap public support for the war. By purposefully encouraging hopelessness and despair on the part of the American people and by encouraging the enemy, the behavior of the Times' editors has been both despicable and disloyal. "Treason" has a real meaning, even in these Times, and it is on display for all to see each day on West 43rd Street in Manhattan.

BRAVO! BTTT!

61 posted on 11/04/2006 11:38:51 AM PST by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
Treadmill? Get used to it. I am a Navy Mom. The people behind this are not sick of it, they are just beginning. The Times just helps them kill us, they do and they will continue to, unless we stop them. Every life is precious, especially the ones who will fight for us. Sacrifice? You bettcha, and these guys do it with no support from those who don't have the guts to fight for it. Sick of it. Yes we are, but we are realy sick of those that aid and abet the enemy.

Yes!! Thank you for responding to that poster. I was going to but couldn't think of a polite way to say what I wanted to say.

62 posted on 11/04/2006 11:41:42 AM PST by Chena ("I'm not young enough to know everything." (Oscar Wilde))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: indylindy
"these guys do it with no support from those who don't have the guts to fight for it. Sick of it. Yes we are, but we are really sick of those that aid and abet the enemy."

Correct!!!! The media are full of a bunch of cowards and traitors. They should be prosecuted as such for their revealing state secrets to aid the enemy (this should include a number of democrats).

63 posted on 11/04/2006 11:42:29 AM PST by Old Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak

You're so right, mystery. That is someone's son, brother, husband -- or even father. I don't even have a family member over there, but feel like they're all "my" guys.


64 posted on 11/04/2006 11:43:43 AM PST by SENClander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
Quote:
the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr ... was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
Unquote.
Stanley Kurtz (NRO on line, June 5, 2001)
65 posted on 11/04/2006 11:45:10 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6

Remember the Wellstone Funeral fiasco? Well...I predict THIS PICTURE will be the turning moment of this election. There is going to be a HUGE BACKLASH against the NY Times and in turn DEMOCRATS for using the picture of one of our Soldiers laying in his own Blood to win a few Seats in this Election HUGE BACKLASH! Don't know if Drudge has this up yet, but by tomorrow it will be all over TV and the Internet!


66 posted on 11/04/2006 11:47:59 AM PST by grannylinedancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BIGLOOK

You win the cake today with that!!!!!! excellant!!!


67 posted on 11/04/2006 11:54:19 AM PST by OregonRancher (illigitimus non carborundun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Old Badger

Hey, this muslim thing, Iraq and the whole middle east is a growing problem. It is not going to just "go away" with a Jon Carrey handshake. America and anyone left in the west better realize that they are in it for a long time if they wish to not wear a bhurka and bow to Islam. These young men and women are fighting for this cause and they deserve our total support. It hurts that we have those out there that will use them for political gain. Thanks, my typing is bad when I get emotional.


68 posted on 11/04/2006 11:56:03 AM PST by dforest (be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Chena
Thanks - and BTW, what I said goes double for the Boston Globe, which is gayer and more socialist.
69 posted on 11/04/2006 12:00:56 PM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: grannylinedancer

I hope so.


70 posted on 11/04/2006 12:03:48 PM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

Don't hold back. Tell them what you think!
executive-editor@nytimes.com
managing-editor@nytimes.com


71 posted on 11/04/2006 12:04:55 PM PST by willk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
Same picture was on the front page of the Seattle Post Intelligencer today.

Connected at the hip to the NY Times.

72 posted on 11/04/2006 12:18:24 PM PST by HardStarboard (Hey illegals, march some more - its helping get the wall built!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88
god bless that soldier. he survived according to the caption

God bless them all, indeed. And relieved to hear he survived - no thanks to the NYSlimes. F'n traitors!

73 posted on 11/04/2006 12:22:16 PM PST by LibSnubber (Liberal democrats are domestic terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
The New York Slimes' glistening new 52-story skyscraper will be opening soon.

They used eminent domain to muscle out the previous tenants.

Those "values" and "democratic ideals" included using eminent domain to forcibly evict 55 businesses--including a trade school, a student housing unit, a Donna Karan outlet, and several mom-and-pop stores--against their will, under the legal cover of erasing "blight," in order to clear ground for a 52-story skyscraper. The Times and Ratner, who never bothered making an offer to the property owners, bought the Port Authority�adjacent property at a steep discount ($85 million) from a state agency that seized the 11 buildings on it; should legal settlements with the original tenants exceed that amount, taxpayers will have to make up the difference. On top of that gift, the city and state offered the Times $26 million in tax breaks for the project, and Ratner even lobbied to receive $400 million worth of U.S. Treasury�backed Liberty Bonds--instruments created by Congress to help rebuild Lower Manhattan. Which is four miles away.

74 posted on 11/04/2006 12:25:01 PM PST by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
More on the NYT's abuse of eminent domain to build their headquarters.

When The New York Times and Forest City Ratner Companies open their grand new office building on Eighth Avenue, it won't have a Taco Bell, McDonald's, Wendy's, or Nathan's, because they are specifically forbidden under terms of a land deal with the state. But a Starbucks or Cosi would be just fine.

The lease, which is on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, also bars renting space in the 52-story building for "a school or classroom or juvenile or adult day care or drop-in center." It forbids "medical uses, including without limitation, hospital, medical, or dental offices, agencies, or clinics." It gives the New York Times Company "the sole and absolute discretion" to reject United Nations or foreign-government offices, including any "considered controversial" or that are potentially the focus of demonstrations. It bans any "employment agency (other than executive-search firms) or job training center" and auction houses, "provided, however, the foregoing shall not apply to high-end auction houses specializing in art and historical artifacts." Discount stores are forbidden. And the deal bars "a welfare or social-services office, homeless shelter or homeless assistance center, court or court-related facility."

In fact, any government office is excluded from the building if it would attract people who arrive "without appointment."

Lease restrictions that exclude the public may not be unusual in luxury office buildings, but there is an irony in this case. The Pataki administration, acting on behalf of the New York Times Company, condemned the property for a so-called "public purpose." This is the standard the Fifth Amendment sets for the state to invoke the immense power of eminent domain.
75 posted on 11/04/2006 12:31:25 PM PST by SeafoodGumbo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indylindy

Thanks for that.

I see the picture differently than what I'm sure the NYT meant.

I see a very brave US soldier. God bless them all.


76 posted on 11/04/2006 12:35:00 PM PST by Balding_Eagle (God has blessed Republicans with political enemies who are going senile.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

The NYT never means our soldiers well. I hope they go down with the people who still thinks its a rag worth the time reading!


77 posted on 11/04/2006 12:38:40 PM PST by dforest (be careful you don't become what you hate the most)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

ALL media reporting should be ordered to stop!All they are doing is giving body counts for the purpose of getting democraps elected.KICK OUT ALL MEDIA AND STOP ALL REPORTING!


78 posted on 11/04/2006 12:48:54 PM PST by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: downtownconservative
I'm also savvy enough to realize that the msm has been playing this negative drum-beat since day one and are culpably responsible for the public's disquietude.

AMEN to that!

79 posted on 11/04/2006 1:16:15 PM PST by Mr_Moonlight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: zarf
The DUmbasses in the lame-stream, has-been, drive-by dinosaur media have to cover Saddam's sentencing tomorrow.

If he's sentenced to DEATH, any further trials are moot and we are again reminded of why our troops are in Iraq - depose Saddam (or REGIME CHANGE as it was referred to when Clinton adopted it as policy, but did nothing more than lip service). DUmocrats wanted the election to be about Iraq, and so it is.

1. Jean-Fraud Kerry infers that soldiers in Iraq are dumb.

2. Soldiers respond

3. NYT admits Saddam had nuke program.

4. Families of fallen visit Iraq (no quagmire)

5. Saddam sentenced (death by wood chipper)

News cycle seems to be working for GOP advantage thus far. DUmocrats today counter with "Rusmsfeld must resign" and "recruiters caugh lying" stories. Wow. That's new....NOT!

In addition to Saddam sentencing, Fox will be running OBSESSION - THE MOVIE, and we get to see the face of the enemy today and tomorrow. Fox is also showing "waterboarding" (Steve Harrigan, a Fox reporter volunteered to show how it is done) all day today.

I don't know what Monday brings, but I've got a good idea about the day after.


80 posted on 11/04/2006 1:25:08 PM PST by RasterMaster (Winning Islamic hearts and minds.........one bullet at a time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
Something told me to watch what I suspected was a semi snuff clip by the NYSLime.......

I was wrong. Watch it and witness authentic heroism.
81 posted on 11/04/2006 1:30:36 PM PST by TET1968 (SI MINOR PLUS EST ERGO NIHIL SUNT OMNIA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: InvisibleChurch

We need to video what our snipers can do and show it on You Tube and Iraq TV. The Iraqs are winning the propaganda war. We also have snipers and sniper killer squads. Lets show the world what we can do. It may not be PC but this is war and war is not about being PC.


82 posted on 11/04/2006 2:09:37 PM PST by baylorbaylor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

That ain't $#!+. Have a look at this:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15459024/site/newsweek/


83 posted on 11/04/2006 2:24:01 PM PST by freema (Marine FRiend, 1stCuz2xRemoved, Mom, Aunt, Sister, Friend, Wife, Daughter, Niece)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
My only regret with Timothy McVeigh
is he did not go to the New York Times Building.

Ann Coulter

84 posted on 11/04/2006 2:26:04 PM PST by John Lenin ( Mr. Stoller concludes that "Democratic Senators are moral lepers, and weaklings")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
"What I'd like to say about the New York Times' editors might also be expressed with a string of four-letter epithets, but I'll keep it clean: The Times is now run by a group of thirty-something mainly homosexual leftists from Ivy League schools who detest our military and believe the United States is a force for evil in the world. They want our enemies to win because they hate us, too. Toward this end, and in support of the efforts of those who seek to destroy our culture and our society, the Times routinely publishes intelligence data helpful to our enemies and photos of violence against our soldiers designed to sap public support for the war. By purposefully encouraging hopelessness and despair on the part of the American people and by encouraging the enemy, the behavior of the Times' editors has been both despicable and disloyal. "Treason" has a real meaning, even in these Times, and it is on display for all to see each day on West 43rd Street in Manhattan."

Well said!! The NY Slimes will not rest until (heaven forbid) they can help to ensure terrorist victory. Publishing that photo at the upper left of the front page, and the two article immediately below are, show that the Slimes continues to be a blatant propaganda organ for the radical left's alliance with the Islamo-fascists. Both groups feel a shared need to undermine America, each for their own reasons. The secular left in the west is sufficiently ignorant and insane to imagine that they can use the rise of Islamo-fascism for their own purposes, kinda like what many very foolish people in Europe thought about the Nazis as some kind of "bulwark" against Bolshevism.
85 posted on 11/04/2006 3:24:19 PM PST by Enchante ("WE SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARE NOT AS SMART AS JON VICHY CARY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Guess you got your wish, Pinch Sulzberger, you worthless smear of gerbil dung! Do you celebrate EVERY dead soldier or Marine in Iraq? After all, for many of the terrorists in Iraq (certainly not all) it is "their country" so according to your Vietnam-era statement you want them to succeed in killing Americans. So you just had to boast about it on the front page, above the fold:

"the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr ... was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
86 posted on 11/04/2006 3:30:54 PM PST by Enchante ("WE SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARE NOT AS SMART AS JON VICHY CARY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: zarf

>>justifiably in my opinion.

Not a surpise.

The Video Game generation expects immediate feedback and reward.


Fact is that casualties have gone down each year.

Fact is we have not had another 9/11 because we are killing the terrorists THERE before they get HERE.

But the MSM don't report facts, do they.

Hysterical cowards.

Keep the promise and CHARLIE MIKE!


87 posted on 11/04/2006 3:44:07 PM PST by VxH (There are those who declare the impossible - and those who do the impossible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Enchante

I agree with you regarding the American Left's tacit alliance with the Islamofascists. Historically though, I think it is more like the Bolsheviks' alliance with the Nazis (pre-1940), in which the Left's desire to end the "old order" in Europe blinded them to Hitler's ultimate goals - and to his madness.


88 posted on 11/04/2006 3:53:38 PM PST by andy58-in-nh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh

Yes and no..... the USSR's sudden "Non-Aggression Pact" with Hitler was of course a political earthquake and freed Hitler to attack both Poland and then in the west. Also there are times when various communists and even the Comintern policies seemed aimed at helping the Nazis destroy "old Europe" as a prelude to what the commies expected would be the universal triumph of the proletariat.

However, there were also plenty of non-communists, including many industrialists, politicians, etc. in Germany and elsewhere, who were far too sympathetic to Hitler's rise as they did not see him as a threat (until it was too late) compared to the Bolsheviks.

That's what I was referring to, that in the early and mid 1930s there were plenty of people in business and politics, both in and out of Germany, who could have done a lot to impede Hitler.


89 posted on 11/04/2006 4:03:27 PM PST by Enchante ("WE SUPPORT THOSE WHO ARE NOT AS SMART AS JON VICHY CARY!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: zarf

What the h@ll do you think Marines do? All war zones are like a perpetual treadmill. Long periods of boredom interrupted by short bursts of chaos.

And if the "American people" don't understand this our media is again distorting the truth.


Semper Fi, Do or Die. Ooooh Rah


90 posted on 11/04/2006 5:07:57 PM PST by Garvin (Democrats, Where's the Plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
Boycott the New York Times

Right. Like anyone on FR subscribes? If they still do, they've passed up a zillion reasons not to - and this one likely won't be a turning point.

91 posted on 11/04/2006 7:02:26 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

You missed the "and advertisers" part. That's the key.


92 posted on 11/04/2006 7:09:36 PM PST by PajamaTruthMafia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: maggief

SCUM!!! They're already morally bankrupt; looks like they're closing in on financial bankruptcy as well. Great!!!


93 posted on 11/04/2006 8:08:53 PM PST by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin

Remember that other papers subscribe to the NYT News Service; therefore this most likely appeared in other papers - it will also certainly be displayed in the Middle East to bolster the spirits of the terrorists.

The NYT truly is an enemy: it is complicit in the deaths and wounding of our servicemen and servicewomen; and it creates conditions to foster attacks on the U.S. and democracies everywhere.


94 posted on 11/04/2006 8:21:00 PM PST by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concentric circles
The NY Times may play politics in the blood of these heroes today but the day will come when it's publishers will be called to account for their actions.

Hmmmm. How about this?

ARTICLE. III.
SECTION. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.

The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the life of the Person attainted.

We could take the Times away from the Sulzberger family, and sell it at auction on the Subtreasury steps in Manhattan. If the high bidder is a conservative, he could, the very next day, fire all those gay, conservative-hating, Bush-bashing Times editors and columnists in one big auto da fe. Call it the "Manhattan Vespers". Does that sound good?

95 posted on 11/05/2006 1:45:08 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Eagles6; Enchante; Eaker; Allegra; humblegunner; anymouse; WOSG
Ping to my last.
96 posted on 11/05/2006 1:50:34 AM PST by lentulusgracchus ("Whatever." -- sinkspur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: freema

Unbelievable.


97 posted on 11/05/2006 7:51:28 AM PST by angelsonmyside (Why won't Nancy talk now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Sounds good to me.

The Republicans could win in a landslide on Tuesday if the Justice Dept. arrested the owner of the nyt, his treasonous writers and editors, and the leakers.

98 posted on 11/05/2006 9:05:46 AM PST by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: PajamaTruthMafia
I wish there was some way to do this on the internet.

I know Starbucks sells the NYT rag at all their shops.

99 posted on 11/06/2006 8:49:08 AM PST by mr. mojo risin (I trained my puppy on the LA Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Vaquero
I hear that Wu's pigs are hungry for fresh NYTimes staffer...

;-)

100 posted on 11/06/2006 3:11:03 PM PST by an amused spectator (Leftist media - black holes of thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson