You should do a write-up on Matthew's pontifications about the TN senate race. He was ranting today about how Harold Ford will lose because of racism ... and what a disgrace it is that we have had so few black senators (the implication being that this is due to racism).
Apparently it's lost on him that it could be the voters considered opinion that compared to Bob Corker, Harold Ford is an immature dufus who has never had a real job. Naturally he also included a tirade about the suppopsedly racist RNC ad with the blonde bimbo. (If you don't see how racist it is, you just don't have a clue. That's me, clueless.)
The best part was when it dawned on him that a black man is about to be elected governor of Massachusetts. His explanation: blacks can win where they are not too large a percentage of the population, because it's not too threatening to have them in power in that circumstance. (I am not making this up).
Completely lost on this boob is how close Michael Steele is to victory in Maryland. Percentage-wise, Maryland has *twice* the black population of Tennessee. Moreover, Steele is running better among whites than blacks, in fact he is getting more of the white vote than Cardin.
This is typical liberal behavior: replacing facts with a woolly-headed analysis in order to appear virtuous. But there's nothing virtuous about it.
"This is typical liberal behavior: replacing facts with a woolly-headed analysis in order to appear virtuous.."
Democratic virtue is as rare as fellatio in the oval office during a republican administration.