Skip to comments.
Mo. Catholics Back Stem Cell Research
Comcast.news ^
| 05 Nov 06
| Associated Press
Posted on 11/05/2006 1:24:07 PM PST by facedown
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Note the lack of distinction between "stem cell" research and "embryonic stem cell" research.
The group, led by former Sen. Tom Eagleton,...
Perfect.
1
posted on
11/05/2006 1:24:08 PM PST
by
facedown
To: cardinal4
2
posted on
11/05/2006 1:25:14 PM PST
by
Bahbah
(Support the military and their mission, vote Republican.)
To: facedown
Is that the Eagleton that ran as McGovern's running mate until it came out that he had received electric shock treatment?
I'm Catholic and I support stem cell research. ADULT stem cells.
To: facedown
Bite down hard on this, Tom...
To: facedown
5
posted on
11/05/2006 1:29:02 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(Let's not enforce laws that are already on the books, let's just write new laws we won't enforce.)
To: facedown
Sen. Tom Eagleton I'm shocked!
To: PhillyRepublican
Is that the Eagleton that ran as McGovern's running mate...I'm pretty sure that it is: Thomas Eagleton
7
posted on
11/05/2006 1:30:36 PM PST
by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: facedown
I agree. It's EMBRYONIC STEM CELL RESEARCH, but the MSM is speaking to the lowest denominator who won't read up about this. Why don't the repubs say more about this distinction? The govt. supports adult stem cell research and if embryonic stem cell research were so promising, all the money in the world would be given by private donations and companies. It drives me so feckin' nuts.
8
posted on
11/05/2006 1:31:36 PM PST
by
peggybac
(Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
To: facedown
Mo.
Catholics Apostates Back Embryonic Stem Cell Research
There, fixed that.
(If I hadn't gotten to it, I suspect one of my separated Latin bretheren would have made the correction sooner or later.)
9
posted on
11/05/2006 1:31:56 PM PST
by
The_Reader_David
(And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
To: Bahbah
10
posted on
11/05/2006 1:34:03 PM PST
by
cardinal4
(Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi..)
To: facedown
Justice Stevens is likely retiring before the end of the year. GET THE VOTERS TO THE POLLS! http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1732428/posts
ONLY YOU CAN ENSURE THAT THE TERRORISTS DO NOT CLAIM VICTORY WITH A DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED CONGRESS!!
CLICK THE IMAGE ABOVE, OR CLICK HERE AND SPEND 15 TO 30 MINUTES MAKING A FEW PHONE CALLS! THAT'S ALL IT TAKES AND YOU CAN MAKE A HUGE DIFFERENCE!
STOP THE ISLAMIC TERRORISTS FROM CLAIMING VICTORY, AND STOP THE JUDICIAL TERRORISTS FROM CLAIMING VICTORY!! THE FUTURE OF OUR NATION IS AT STAKE!
If YOU have your own site, or your own blog, BY ALL MEANS, POST THIS CALL TO ACTION!
For more info, visit http://www.nodnc.com
11
posted on
11/05/2006 1:34:39 PM PST
by
woodb01
(ANTI-DNC Web Portal at ---> http://www.noDNC.com)
To: The_Reader_David
Any "Catholic" who publicly backs EMBRYONIC stem cell research should be excommunicated pronto.
12
posted on
11/05/2006 1:35:10 PM PST
by
utahagen
To: facedown
The title of the thread itself is deceiving. Besides the issue of stem cell research vs. fetal stem cell research, the title makes you think that Catholics in general support "stem cell research" (and specifically fetal stem cell research) when its actually some group using the Catholic name that has come out in favor of the ballot question. The headline makes one think that Missouri Catholics are in opposition to the Church position.
The fact is that I would guess most Catholics do support stem cell research. Hopefully very few support fetal stem cell research. This is exactly the Church position.
13
posted on
11/05/2006 1:38:27 PM PST
by
big'ol_freeper
(It looks like one of those days when one nuke is just not enough-- Lt. Col. Mitchell, SG-1)
To: facedown; aroostook war; Kevmo; TheRake; rogator; kellynla; redgirlinabluestate; DadOfTwoMarines; ..
+
If you want on (or off) this Catholic and Pro-Life ping list, let me know!
14
posted on
11/05/2006 1:38:28 PM PST
by
narses
(St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
To: facedown
Amendment 2 is deceptively written and the lies truly begin when proponents attempt to explain it.
It pretends that "cloning" doesn't occur when the embryo is CLONED, but only after that CLONED EMBRYO has been implanted in the womb.
The "logic" is that since the baby is killed before it can be born, it's not cloning.
What a pack of lies!
15
posted on
11/05/2006 1:38:41 PM PST
by
G Larry
(Only strict constructionists on the Supreme Court!)
To: facedown
I thought this was about cloning.
To: facedown
misinformation, scare tactics and distortions being spread by opponents of the initiative, including the church.
I'm not to keen on Mo politics but these sound like modified dem talking points, the blame game with no supporting evidence.
17
posted on
11/05/2006 1:40:12 PM PST
by
kinoxi
To: Eric in the Ozarks
LOL... Tom needs his voltage increased.
18
posted on
11/05/2006 1:40:47 PM PST
by
johnny7
(“And what's Fonzie like? Come on Yolanda... what's Fonzie like?!”)
To: facedown
I am so fed up with these "Catholic" politicians who don't give a darn about the teachings of their face and who relish poking their fingers in the Church's eye every chance they get. And my state's two execrable senators (Kennedy and Kerry) top the list of offenders...
To: facedown
Something I haven't seen addressed is this: assume that embryonic stem cell research does result in a fantastic cure for some important disease. Where would all the embryonic stem cells then come from needed to treat the millions of afflicted by said disease???
20
posted on
11/05/2006 1:47:32 PM PST
by
E=MC<sup>2</sup>
(Are liberals born stupid, or do they have to work at it???)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson