To: jalisco555
I am with you. Clinton was not a leader but he was a great counter puncher. With a Republican Congress, Clinton had an enemy he could attack. I just don't see Bush having these skills. He is more of a leader and is not an effective counter puncher. I see him as a very lame duck right now. My only hope is for the democrats to self destruct and for a bright conservative Republican nominee to capture the voter's anger. I can count on the Democrats to self destruct. I am pessimistic about the Republican nominee.
40 posted on
11/08/2006 6:03:27 AM PST by
MBB1984
To: MBB1984
The Republicans refused to bring out the 9/11 videos. That cost them a lot of votes.
We need to get tough.
45 posted on
11/08/2006 6:05:30 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: MBB1984
I am with you. Clinton was not a leader but he was a great counter puncher. With a Republican Congress, Clinton had an enemy he could attack. I just don't see Bush having these skills. He is more of a leader and is not an effective counter puncher. Bush's problem is that he is a lousy communicator. I say that as someone who voted for him twice and it is the truth.
52 posted on
11/08/2006 6:12:55 AM PST by
New Girl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson