To: beckysueb
One surprise this time was the high number of younger voters who turned out. I think it was 10 million more than 2004. Most of those votes are liberal, because they are still in college or just out, or they are in lower-paying jobs where the class warfare spiel gets some traction. They are also easily manipulated by the media (especially Hollywood and music).
104 posted on
11/11/2006 7:06:49 AM PST by
Miss Marple
(Lord, thank you for Mozart Lover's son's safe return, and look after Jemian's son, please!)
To: Miss Marple
And the promise of the wage an hour increase. These programs sound good to uninformed voters.
To: Miss Marple
One surprise this time was the high number of younger voters who turned out. I think it was 10 million more than 2004. Most of those votes are liberal, because they are still in college or just out, or they are in lower-paying jobs where the class warfare spiel gets some traction. They are also easily manipulated by the media (especially Hollywood and music).How do you blame non-voters for that? (It's rhetorical - not aimed at you)
108 posted on
11/11/2006 7:11:45 AM PST by
raybbr
(You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote.)
To: Miss Marple
One surprise this time was the high number of younger voters who turned outA lot of states had minimum wage propositions on the ballot.
115 posted on
11/11/2006 7:30:26 AM PST by
McGavin999
(Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
To: Miss Marple
One surprise this time was the high number of younger voters who turned out. I think it was 10 million more than 2004.
Curious..... where are you getting that info?...
Exit polling shows the 18-29 yr old group for this election at 12% [60% democrat] where in the 04 presidential race they were at 17% [54% Kerry].... I haven't looked at total participation by numbers for 04-06 but usually an off year is much lower.
149 posted on
11/11/2006 12:14:44 PM PST by
deport
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson