To: rodguy911
Rush-- attacking Michael J. Fox near the end and we did just enough to lose.As I understand it, Rush actually tightened that race. At least the cloning advocates in MO believe Rush is why it barely passed. They had been seeing overwhelming support until the Rush/Fox kerkuffle. I assume that translates fairly well to the Senatorial race, too. Do you know differently?
55 posted on
11/12/2006 5:47:27 AM PST by
chiller
(Heaven help this republic..)
To: chiller
A close look at Missouri voting results will show you that he actually did cost us that race. That's all I am going to say right now.
70 posted on
11/12/2006 5:57:57 AM PST by
Miss Marple
(Lord, thank you for Mozart Lover's son's safe return, and look after Jemian's son, please!)
To: chiller
After many years on talk radio I suspect differently.<p.
It's usually a mistake to go after a popular celeb with an incurable disease--even if he is wrong--only days before a major election.I could be wrong, but even McCaskill credits Rush with her victory.(not that she has any credibility)
Bottom line I would rather Rush had talked about falling gas prices lower unemployment, all the good things that were ignored by the msm-- all the lies and spins of the DBM on major issues especially in Iraq for the last few days instead of burning so much time on stem cell.
Just my opinion.
132 posted on
11/12/2006 6:21:36 AM PST by
rodguy911
(Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson