Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: WatchingInAmazement

One poll? OMG.

Hon, you couldn't buy a clue if I gave you the money.

There were loads of polls in there. From all sorts of media outlets.

But carry on.


59 posted on 11/15/2006 9:59:42 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]


To: Peach

Good lord you are contrary. STOP twisting what is said!It makes you look BAD. Now, I'm done with you, just like MOST of us are done with those few of you who, like Bush, think they're right on this issue. YOU are hopeless. Enjoy your destruction of this once great country.

I SAID, "There is an entire page of such polls like the one you posted. MOST of them disagree. From your own source...
http://www.pollingreport.com/prioriti.htm"

Here'some more:

.



Here Are The Results of SurveyUSA News Poll #9405

Geography Surveyed: Kansas
Data Collected: 05/30/2006 - 05/31/2006
Release Date: 06/01/2006 10:10 AM ET
Sponsor: KWCH-TV Wichita


12% Abortion Regulations
20% Education Funding
7% Gambling
21% Health Care
21% Illegal Immigration
3% Rural Development
8% Taxes
4% Other
2% Not Sure
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollReportEmail.aspx?g=18568b6c-1003-4a93-8a1e-5733b1d36970

_________


39 percent of those polled think illegal immigration is the most important issue facing Colorado.

68 percent of those polled believe illegal immigrants are costing Colorado a lot of tax money.

45 percent of those polled think employers should be responsible for checking workers' status.

56 percent of those polled think employers should be severely penalized for hiring illegal immigrants.

63 percent of those polled think it was appropriate for the state to address illegal immigration.

http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_4057715

_____


Immigration is a big issue throughout country. Of likely voters nationally, 53 percent said immigration was either their most important issue or one of their top three issues, while just 8 percent said it was not at all important. With the exception of CT-4th, in races surveyed only about 10 percent of voters said it was not important at all.

*

When told numbers, voters want less immigration. When told the actual number of immigrants here (legal and illegal) and the number coming (legal and illegal), and asked to put aside the question of legal status, 68 percent of voters nationally thought immigration was too high, 21 percent about right, and just 2 percent thought it was too low. In every congressional race surveyed, the share who said overall immigration was too low was in the single digits.

*

Voters less likely to vote for immigration-increasing candidates. Experts agree that the bill recently passed by the Senate would at least double future legal immigration, yet 70 percent of voters said they would be less likely to vote for a candidate who wanted to double legal immigration. Overwhelming majorities in every battleground race feel the same way.

*

Voters reject extremes of legalization or mass deportations. Some previous polls have shown support for legalizing illegal immigrants. But those polls have given the public only a choice between large-scale deportations or an earned legalization, and not the third choice of across-the-board enforcement, causing illegals to go home. This third option, which is the basis of the bill passed by the US House, is voters’ top choice.

*

U.S. House immigration plan by far the favorite. Enforcement approaches with no increase in legal immigration were the most popular policy option -- 44 percent wanted enforcement that causes illegals to go home, the US House’s approach, and another 20 percent wanted large-scale deportations. Just 31 percent supported a legalization.

*

Intensity stronger among enforcement supporters. Nationally, 32 percent of voters said they would be much more likely to vote for a candidate who would enforce the law and cause illegals to go home, compared to just 15 percent who said they would be much more likely to vote for a candidate who supports legalization. This same pattern holds in battleground contests.

*

Voters skeptical of need for unskilled immigrant labor. More than 70 percent of voters nationally agreed that there were, “plenty of Americans to do low-wage jobs that require relatively little education, employers just need to pay higher wages and treat workers better to attract Americans,” compared to 21 percent who said we need immigrants because there were not enough Americans to do all such jobs. The results were very similar in all the contested states and districts surveyed.

*

Voters think lack of enforcement is reason for illegal immigration. Three out of four voters in the nation agreed that the reason we have illegal immigration is that past enforcement efforts have before “grossly inadequate.” Voters strongly reject the argument that illegal immigration is caused by overly restrictive legal immigration policies. Strong majorities in every battleground contest surveyed felt this way.

*

Numbers make a difference. One key finding is that when told the scale of immigration (legal and illegal), voters overwhelming thought it was too high. Also when told how much the Senate bill would increase legal immigration voters tended to reject it. This would seem to undermine the argument that voters are only concerned about illegality and not the level of immigration. The level of immigration used in the questions are those widely agreed upon by experts based on government data.

For more information, contact Steven Camarota at (202) 466-8185 sac@cis.org or Kellyanne Conway at (202) 667-6557.
http://www.cis.org/articles/2006/2006pollrelease.html


61 posted on 11/15/2006 10:29:31 AM PST by WatchingInAmazement ("Nothing is more expensive than cheap labor," prof. Vernon Briggs, labor economist Cornell Un.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson