Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Casey Ran as "Pro-Life"; His First Act Seeks "Sexual Orientation" Hate Crime Law
LifeSiteNews ^ | 11/14/06 | Meg Jalsevac

Posted on 11/14/2006 4:14:43 PM PST by wagglebee

SCRANTON, PA, November 14, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – Within 24 hours of winning the bitter Pennsylvanian Senate race against incumbent Republican Rick Santorum, Democrat Senator-elect Bob Casey, Jr. let his real agendas show through.  Citizenlink.org has reported that, the very day after the election, Casey announced that he would work in support of legislation to increase the scope of federal hate crimes law to encompass sexual orientation and gender identity as a victim group.  

Casey was chosen by the Democratic party to run against Santorum because of his supposedly moderate Democratic views. Throughout the election race, Casey’s campaign touted him as a pro-life and pro-family moderate candidate who valued his Catholic faith.

However, Casey was immediately and unabashedly backed in his election bid by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC), a pro-gay activist group.  On the HRC website, it claims “HRC flexed its political muscle and launched an extensive and strategic campaign in partnership with local organizations that resulted in a clear victory for fair-minded candidate Casey.” 

According to the website, HRC raised over $375,000 for Casey’s campaign.  It also claims that it supplied 4 office staffers and hundreds of volunteers to encourage Pennsylvanians to vote.  

Casey thanked HRC the day after the election saying, “HRC got behind my campaign early and has been a tremendous help.  I look forward to working with HRC’s incredible staff and membership, especially to advance hate-crimes legislation in the Senate.”

In several election surveys Casey admitted that he opposed gay marriage but that he would support homosexual unions.  In October of last year, Casey was quoted in The Philadelphia Jewish Voice as saying “I don't support gay marriage, but I also don't support a constitutional amendment banning it. That would be tremendously divisive. However, I do support same sex unions that would give gay couples all the rights, privileges and protections of marriage.”

Casey also admitted in similar surveys that he would support legislation that would increase penalties for crimes committed against an individual because of their sexual orientation. 

Diane Gramley, president of the American Family Association of Pennsylvania, said, “It didn’t take long for his true colors to show throw.  Too Many Pennsylvanians were misled and misinformed by Mr. Casey's campaign rhetoric."

Adding sexual orientation verbage to hate-crime legislation is a threat to the First  Amendment rights of all Americans who oppose homosexuality.  Gramley said, "Right here in Pennsylvania we know what hate-crimes legislation that includes 'sexual orientation' and 'gender identity' can mean to Christians.  In 2004 we witnessed 11 Christians being arrested and charged with a hate crime for simply reading Scripture and singing choruses at a homosexual event."

The event that Gramley referred to happened in October 2004 when 11 Christian protestors were arrested and held in jail for 21 hours on various charges.  The protesters were protesting OutFest, a homosexual festival held in Philadelphia.  The protesters were swarmed by members of a homosexual group but only the Christian protesters were taken into custody by police.

Soon after the event, it surfaced that the homosexual group had planned their actions well before the actual event.  The coordinator of the homosexual event said “It's our event, and we're not going to permit vendors or community groups that conflict with the theme of the event.”  He also publicly admitted that their actions infringed on the First Amendment rights of the Christians.  No charges were brought against any of the homosexual individuals. 

Canada and several other countries recently passed hate-crime legislation which included ‘sexual orientation’ as a specific victim group.  Within those jurisdictions there have been several instances of individuals, particularly clergy members, being prosecuted for speaking out about the immorality of homosexuality. 

Santorum, decisively beaten by a 20% margin by Casey, was nationally renowned for his conservative views, especially on issues of life and family.  He had previously voted against legislation that had attempted to include sexual orientation under the hate-crime umbrella.

Too late, Pennsylvania voters are finding out the hard way that Senator-elect Casey’s actions will speak much louder than his words. 

Read WorldNetDaily coverage of the 2004 event:

Homosexuals planned Christian harassment
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=422...
Christians arrested at homosexual event
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=409...

Read Related LifeSite Coverage:
Same-Sex “Marriage,” “Hate Crimes,” and the New Totalitarianism – Michael O’Brien
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2005/feb/050228a.html
Catholic League Notes Results of Homosexual Hate Crime Law in Other Countries as Warning to Canada
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/apr/04043006.html
Homosexual Hate Crime Signed into Law; Chilling Effect on Free Speech, Religion and Importing Materials
http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2004/apr/04042901.html



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bobcasey; casey; democrats; homosexualagenda; hypocrite; moralabsolutes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: padre35
In the mafia these types are known as "clean faces" seemingly upright fronts for really terrible behavior.

I never heard the term, clean faces, before. I'll remind myself to use the analogy sometime.

21 posted on 11/14/2006 4:40:09 PM PST by Stepan12 (Mark Steyn: "We are all spaniards now.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
"The left lies to gain power and that's it."

The right does it's fair share as well
22 posted on 11/14/2006 4:45:52 PM PST by tfecw (It's for the children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

To the voters of PA------SUCKERS~!


23 posted on 11/14/2006 4:47:13 PM PST by bmwcyle (The snake is loose in the garden and Eve just bit the apple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

No surprises here. Casey looks to be a bigger phony than Lieberman.


24 posted on 11/14/2006 4:48:43 PM PST by darkangel82 (Everyone has the right to be an idiot, but on DU they abuse the privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10
Are there any laws so blatantly unfair as hate crime laws? A crime is a crime, delineating it as a crime of hate is ridiculous. Not to mention, these "hate crimes" encapsulate otherwise protected free speech. Telling someone what they are doing is wrong is all of a sudden a crime b/c the person in the wrong is gay/black/woman/NonWhiteStraightProtestantMale?

It is getting out of control.

25 posted on 11/14/2006 5:00:52 PM PST by thehumanlynx (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. -Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: darkangel82

But Casey Jr. is supported Bishop James Clifford Timlin and Bishop Martino!

These Bishops turned against old reliable Santorum when it came to Pro Life and turned their support to Casey Jr. because Bishop Timlin is a person friend of the Casey Family!


26 posted on 11/14/2006 5:03:56 PM PST by petkus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A really important thing to start with.


27 posted on 11/14/2006 5:07:29 PM PST by dforest (Don't get fooled, the bigger struggle is still out there, and growing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

We'll see how he feels after only one term!


28 posted on 11/14/2006 5:08:00 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: djf

YES, when it that going to be tested in our Supreme Court?
This looks like a clear violation of the "equal protection" clause.

Under "hate crimes" legislation...the moron who dragged a black man to death behind his car would get a more severe penalty then the illegal alien who did the same to his ex girlfriend. Same crime, same horrible end for each victim, but different verdicts????

Where's the justice in that?


29 posted on 11/14/2006 5:10:30 PM PST by bordergal (There is no curse in Elvish, Entish, or the tongues of men bad enough for this treachery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tdewey10; wagglebee

**Ah hate crime laws **

So is abortion a "hate crime?"

Hate the idea of having a baby?


30 posted on 11/14/2006 5:10:32 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Just more proof that the left wing congress will only last two years. They can't stop their war against God.


31 posted on 11/14/2006 5:15:20 PM PST by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petkus
Prove it now.
32 posted on 11/14/2006 5:16:02 PM PST by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
So is abortion a "hate crime?"

No, killing your unborn baby is a "private decision" that should be given about as much consideration as what to wear when you get dressed in the morning, it is a "right" that the "bioethicists" are hoping you will soon have to kill any child or infirmed relative whose life is "inconvenient" to you.

33 posted on 11/14/2006 5:16:27 PM PST by wagglebee ("We are ready for the greatest achievements in the history of freedom." -- President Bush, 1/20/05)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule

Is it legal that, in order to vote in PA, a person must be board certified as stupid?


34 posted on 11/14/2006 5:35:46 PM PST by bybybill (`IF TH E RATS WIN, WE LOSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I wonder if some people who voted for him are sorry now? He sure didn't take long to reveal his true colors.


35 posted on 11/14/2006 5:39:16 PM PST by little jeremiah (Jesus' message is not "BUY MORE STUFF"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I hope those suckers at Catholic University are happy they gave Bobby a forum to speak and gain legitimacy as a Catholic candidate. The guy is a wolf in sheep's clothing and always was. The homosexual activists' #1 priority was defeating Rick Santorum and they helped to recruit Casey to deliberately fool Catholic voters.

Some of us are not going to take this lying down. I am talking to some PA conservatives about starting a "Casey Watch" organization.

36 posted on 11/14/2006 5:45:44 PM PST by Dems_R_Losers (The people have spoken.......the housecleaning starts NOW!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bybybill
****Is it legal that, in order to vote in PA, a person must be board certified as stupid?****

I don't know. I call my dad and ask him. LOL!

37 posted on 11/14/2006 5:46:30 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule (Go Bucks.....beat That Team From Up North!!!!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

bump


38 posted on 11/14/2006 5:53:22 PM PST by stevio (Red-Blooded Crunchy Con American Male (NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima; petkus

Prove it now..


39 posted on 11/14/2006 5:55:12 PM PST by fatima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"People knew they were liberals and voted for them anyway."

Not in PA, the Home of the Brain Dead Voter (not to mention the dead and buried ones.) My brother and sister-in-law are Reagan Democrats, never changed their registration, but have been voting Republican since then. 4 yrs. ago they tried to convince us to vote for Rendell because Catherine Baker Knoll is a neighbor of her mother. This time it was to not only vote for Rendell, but vote for Casey because "he is just as pro-life, pro-NRA, and conservative as Santorum" whom they had previously supported. Some people wanted desperately to be fooled so they could return to the good old days of voting straight "D."

40 posted on 11/14/2006 6:00:10 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson