Skip to comments.
J.D> Hayworth's(2006 immigration hardliner) election results from 2000-2006
CNN Election reults ^
| November 15, 2006
Posted on 11/15/2006 10:36:23 AM PST by Dane
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 next last
To: Dane; Admin Moderator
Altering titles to push your agenda is a blatent violation of FR guidelines.
81
posted on
11/15/2006 12:18:20 PM PST
by
jmc813
To: zbigreddogz
If you want any kind of "guest worker" program, it'll have to be Kyl/Cornyn in order to get it to pass. Arizonan's have NO problem with LEGAL immigration, as a matter of fact they are welcomed here. It's the illegals that are swamping the system. We also don't like law breakers because they have no problem with breaking OTHER laws, like having insurance when they drive cars, or paying for their doctor bills, or not taking what they want from those who worked hard for it.
82
posted on
11/15/2006 12:20:55 PM PST
by
McGavin999
(Republicans take out our trash, Democrats re-elect theirs)
To: Arizona Carolyn
We just have to accept the fact that since values voters are part of our base, pubbies will pay a higher price for scandal than dems. The solution is for our officials to keep their pants zipped up and hands out of other peoples pockets.
To: colorado tanker
That's right. Above reproach.
To: skeeter
Wow, that's facinating.
A Mexican who's crime is wanting a job is the moral equivilant of killing a defenseless child.
Excuse me while I puke.
If you believe this, you are a disgrace to the pro-life movement.
To: jmc813
Please tell me how posting past election results is "altering" a title.
Sheesh someone hit the bong early today?
86
posted on
11/15/2006 12:28:09 PM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: Dane
What was the immigration position of his opponent in 2006?
Was he pro or anti illegal immigration?
Was he for or against amnesty?
To: zbigreddogz
Your ability to see whats not in evidence is breathtaking.
Try a remedial reading course at your local JC.
88
posted on
11/15/2006 12:30:07 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: common denominator
What was the immigration position of his opponent in 2006? Hayworth was Tancredo hardline. He even voted against HR 4437 because he said it wasn't tough enough.
89
posted on
11/15/2006 12:31:36 PM PST
by
Dane
("Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall" Ronald Reagan, 1987)
To: zbigreddogz
BTW, 18 americans are killed by illegal aliens every day. I guess you're alright with that.
See how easy playing that game is?
90
posted on
11/15/2006 12:31:48 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
Yah? A whole lot more then that are killed by American citizens.
Your point is?
To: Dane
You screwed up the period after the "D" too. Speaking of screwed up D's, sorry the Steelers will be sitting at home watching the Jets in the playoffs this year.
92
posted on
11/15/2006 12:36:04 PM PST
by
jmc813
To: zbigreddogz
If that's true, why are all the Tancredo folks out there shouting that it's because wern't harsh enough on immigration that we lost?
I don't know why pundits think the way they do, but the fact is that immigration before recent years just didn't turn people out to vote one way or the other. When people were asked why they voted a certain way, they almost invariably replied either Iraq, security, the economy, or moral issues.
To: zbigreddogz
Your point is?You missed it, alright.
Its easy to lay the blame for last week's loss at the feet of someone who's issue you don't feel is important as your's, but the argument you make against them might be applied to your own favorite issue.
This is why political parties have won in the past on PLATFORMS. Its a package deal. Throw out one issue and you can throw them all out.
94
posted on
11/15/2006 12:42:30 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
This is why political parties have won in the past on PLATFORMS. Its a package deal. Throw out one issue and you can throw them all out. Show me a political party who's members agree on every issue, and I'll show you a political party who has one member and zero power.
To: zbigreddogz
Theres that reading comprehension problem again. Where did I say we need to agree? I'd settle for refraining from actively undermining the other republican's issue. How about that?
96
posted on
11/15/2006 12:52:16 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: skeeter
Its a package deal. Throw out one issue and you can throw them all out.
To: zbigreddogz
Its a package deal. Throw out one issue and you can throw them all out.Yes, I said that. Did you forget to post a comment?
98
posted on
11/15/2006 12:58:13 PM PST
by
skeeter
To: Arizona Carolyn; discostu
AZ-8 voted as presently constituted voted 53-47 Bush in 2004, and 49-47 (4 for Nader) Bush in 2000. It is a marginal district, not a liberal one.
99
posted on
11/15/2006 1:21:31 PM PST
by
Torie
To: Torie
It's a liberal district that occasionally breaks moderate.
100
posted on
11/15/2006 1:23:42 PM PST
by
discostu
(we're two of a kind, silence and I)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-133 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson