[A.J.Armitage]

You imagine people saying the killers at Columbine should have been medicated, so when they point out nobody says that because out here in the real world they were medicated, you accuse them of contradicting themselves.

[robertpaulsen]

"You imagine people saying the killers at Columbine should have been medicated"

I was speaking in generalities and gave Columbine as an example of what I was talking about. That what the parenthesis mean.

When kids are not medicated and commit crimes that make the headlines, people complain that the parents didn't see the "obvious signs" and should have been medicating their children.

Now, you don't like the example I used? You'd prefer to ignore the point I was trying to make and would rather nit pick and say one of the Columbine killers was on meds? Fine, if that's all you got, go for it.

Of course that leads into my second argument that when kids ARE on meds and commit crimes that make the headlines, people blame the meds. My guess is that it's the same people. Probably people like you.