Posted on 11/28/2006 10:38:15 AM PST by shrinkermd
HAVE I EVER wondered what a wonderful world it would be if only my fans could get together, talk about how great I am and fall in love over their joint love for me? Sure, but unlike Fox News commentator Sean Hannity, I haven't done anything about it. At Hannity.com, in addition to enjoying the book club (Newt Gingrich, Jeff Foxworthy), song club (Charlie Daniels Band, Martina McBride), photos (Hannity's Insanity in Phoenix) and comic books ("Liberality for All" is set in 2021 and has a bionic Hannity, G. Gordon Liddy, Oliver North and a man born on Sept. 11, 2001, fighting to save a U.S. controlled by the U.N., including Ambassador Osama bin Laden), visitors can log on to Hannidate.
Conservatives need late-night, out-of-town hookups just as much as liberals. They also, it seems, need some hot man-on-man action. If you pull down the menu on Hannidate, you can select "I am a male, seeking a male." This was surprising because not even eHarmony allows same-sex pairings. Stranger still for a Fox News commentator's site, you can select ZIP Codes in Beverly Hills, Provincetown and San Francisco.
(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...
It is the libs who play the gay card - like Al Gore's telling Jesse Jerkson to spread the rumor that Ralph Nader was gay. I could not care less what kind of "dating service" Hannity has on his website. Apparently, Little Mr. Stein is fixated on it.
Lol! I've often wondered, if you ask someone if they are gay, is it a queery?
Let's be honest here. While not exclusive, it is obvious that the vast majority of Republicans (as well as the majority of Sean Hannity listeners) do not support the expansion of homosexual benefits. I fall into both categories and do not support the expansion. Of course it would seem surprising that Hannity show would include the "male seeking male" option on the dating site. I don't have a problem with that, but it does sort of jump out and made for an interesting humor column.
>>He stated it was a no-win situation because he'd get criticized if he allowed homosexuals on the site or if he didn't. Apparently, alienating a good portion of his audience was less of a concern than homosexual activists and PC-types.
He also labeled those pursuing the story as hypocrites.<<
Interesting - I would have bet on him using canned software instead of making a choice to do it that way.
I doubt he spent much effort on the service and uses it as a novelty to draw in visitors/listeners. It is caveatted with disclaimers. And if he decided to disable the homo mode, I'm sure the ACLU, etc. would be jumping all over it. I'm sure the outsourced service does cull through the posts to keep it from getting too outrageous. After all it is a relationship site not a sex site.
I am not impressed with this excuse. That is the same as Walmart does with having a homosexual site on their online website and people were jumping up and down on Walmart. If Sean needs to attract that many listners or callers than he should at least practice what he preaches. This is not good IMHO.
Sean Vanity?
That makes three.
;-)
I don't think Vanity belongs to the Fudge Packers Union.
lol
He's a sanctimonious, self-induldent airhead who is about the worst interviewer in the business. And ........ his nasally, grating voice and demeanor makes me want to barf.
LOL .... from an unknown FReeper from a while back:
Today On Hannity:
Hannity talks with:
Henry Kissinger...about Sean's book
William Bennett...about Sean's book
Venus Williams...about Sean's book
The widow of Dr. Atkins...about Sean's book
Bush detractors...about Sean's book
Bush supporters...about Sean's book
Some Sheik from goatville...about Sean's book
The parents of some dead kid...about Sean's book
Please stay tuned!
http://static.flickr.com/25/99321671_b292246abb_o.jpg
Ditto.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.