Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Careful: Employee E-Mails, IMs **Must Be Tracked** (New Federal Rule)
Local6.com ^ | December 1, 2006 | no author cited

Posted on 12/02/2006 10:22:28 AM PST by HighWheeler

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Psycho_Bunny
IMs are just another way for people not to work.

Well, phones can have the same result. What ever happened to the concept of judging someone's job performance based on their... job performance?

41 posted on 12/02/2006 12:07:09 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
I see the prohibition of e-mail in corporate environs. And no more USB ports on our computers!

Here we have the government insisting that it has the (ungranted, actually prohibited) right to eavesdrop on assumed private conversation in a corporate environment, and the corporation has a duty to collect and present such as probative evidence. It is like insisting on recovering a person's thoughts, rather than his decisions, actions and behaviors, to determine guilt or innocence of some infraction.

Suppose some employer has a crazy employee who wants to off the US president, and expresses such in an e-mail. Is the company guilty in conspiracy to assassinate the president?

This is an absurd usurpation of the 4th.

42 posted on 12/02/2006 12:29:57 PM PST by GregoryFul (There's no truth in the New York Times)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: proxy_user
I've never seen IMs be anything but disruptive, but I've never worked in a company that had divisions spread around throughout different cities.  It's interesting that your company has a practical use for them.

When I worked in IT at Bank of America, we had an IMing system set up and reading the logs for that system was basically just reading sex talk.....and jokes and gossip.

But most of the working divisions there were centralized within themselves.

43 posted on 12/03/2006 5:49:08 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Cementjungle
Well, phones can have the same result. What ever happened to the concept of judging someone's job performance based on their... job performance?

Phones aren't the same....in a normal office the persons next to you hear the phone conversations so fewer people waste time on the phone.  No one hears you IMing.....as far as your co-workers know, someone IMing could just as well be working.

And it's really not all about job performance.  Although, that's part of the problem.

 

44 posted on 12/03/2006 5:55:33 AM PST by Psycho_Bunny (`)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny

The most amusing use of IM is private conversations during large, official phone conferences.

A: That guy must not know the architecure.
B: He's just a manager, he doesn't understand the technology he supports.
A: You'd think his people would tell him.
B; He doesn't listen.
A: Well, should be explain why it won't work?
B: No, just let him spout off. We'll just go ahead and do it the right way. He'll never know....


45 posted on 12/03/2006 8:52:04 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson