Replies

If the other Democrats you're talking about are Ted Kennedy, Barbara Boxer, and Hillary Clinton, then you might have a point in saying he's not so bad. But I can only say 'might', because if you look at his voting record, then is there really that much difference between them?

In fact, Obama is more of a threat because he packages his far-left ideology in an appealing, media-friendly cover. A President Obama would easily be the most leftwing Presidency of modern times.

Yeah, but if this voting record is all you got on him: * Planned Parenthood 100% in 2006. * National Right to Life Committee 0% in 2005-2006. * Americans for Tax Reform 0% in 2005. * NAACP 100% in 2005. * American Conservative Union 8 percent in 2005. * Illinois Environmental Council 100% in 2003. * Children's Defense Fund [Hillary's old beat] 100% in 2005. * National Organization For Women 100% in 2005. * NRA, 'F' in 2004. * Federation for American Immigration Reform 0% in 2005. * 2005 AFL-CIO 92%. Then you ain't got much to motivate a voting base. Right now I think his inexperience is his biggest drawback. I think his middle name being Hussein and his last name rhyming with 'Osama' are probably big enough factors to keep him out of the White House (even as a VP), but I'd want a little more than that and his 100% NAACP voting record if I were an adversary. In short, we'll need some dirt on this guy to keep him from being a factor... something more than just the shady land deal with his 'neighbor'.