Skip to comments.
Does Size Matter, Or How Many Shots Does A Cop Need To Kill Someone?
The ( Philadelphia) Bulletin ( They dropped the Evening from the title of the paper) ^
| 12/15/2006
| MICHAEL P. TREMOGLIE
Posted on 12/15/2006 6:08:40 PM PST by Miami Vice
Does firing fifty shots really mean the cops in the Sean Bell case used excessive force? The Bulletin's ex-cop and current columnist Michael P. Tremoglie says maybe not and gives facts and figures to back it up.
This is the link. If it doesn't work cut and paste to your browser: http://www.thebulletin.us/site/news.cfm?newsid=17596640&BRD=2737&PAG=461&dept_id=574088&rfi=6
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: New York; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: banglist; nypd; police; seanbellshooting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: Miami Vice
There's a really simple answer to these kinds of questions: unless the guy had more than one life, the number of bullets used to kill him is irrelevant. Either the killing was justified or it wasn't.
To: Miami Vice
There's no evening in Winter.
Only afternoon and night.
3
posted on
12/15/2006 6:13:16 PM PST
by
battlegearboat
(No homework today!)
To: ArmstedFragg
Exactly. If they had to shoot it was to kill. It doesn't matter how many bullets killed him. If police shoot to wound they end up dead.
4
posted on
12/15/2006 6:14:39 PM PST
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
To: Miami Vice
Perhaps it did take less than 50 shots to kill him. So what? After whatever number of shots it would have taken to kill him what's it matter? If 2 shots would have killed him then they wasted 48 bullets, and if 49 shots would have killed him then they wasted one. So what? Is everyone outraged at the amount of ammunition supposedly wasted? Dead is dead.
5
posted on
12/15/2006 6:15:23 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(I've never paid for sex in my life. And that's really pissed off a lot of prostitutes.)
To: ArmstedFragg
Well, a missed shot does not count at all, and a peripheral hit does not count for much, either [unless in few vital zones like femoral artery]. The policeman is not Carlos Hathcock, and his sidearm is not a sniper rifle anyway.
6
posted on
12/15/2006 6:15:29 PM PST
by
GSlob
To: Miami Vice
7
posted on
12/15/2006 6:15:45 PM PST
by
doc1019
To: Miami Vice
8
posted on
12/15/2006 6:16:10 PM PST
by
Cindy
To: Jaysun
Best tagline of the week!
9
posted on
12/15/2006 6:16:25 PM PST
by
Xenalyte
(Anything is possible when you don't understand how anything happens.)
To: Miami Vice
If one bullet had been used to kill this perp it would've
been called an execution by the media.
10
posted on
12/15/2006 6:17:09 PM PST
by
MaxMax
(God Bless America)
To: Miami Vice
11
posted on
12/15/2006 6:17:10 PM PST
by
tubebender
(Growing old is mandatory...Growing up is optional)
To: Miami Vice
If the threat is to the level a cop needs to pull out a gun, he better win the battle. If he empties the clip, I understand.
12
posted on
12/15/2006 6:17:12 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Miami Vice
"Why'd you shoot him 44 times?"
"Ran outta ammo."
13
posted on
12/15/2006 6:19:19 PM PST
by
Lonesome in Massachussets
(The hallmark of a crackpot conspiracy theory is that it expands to include countervailing evidence.)
To: 69ConvertibleFirebird
CCW licencees are taught not to shoot to kill but to shoot to stop. That's entirely different.
This officer had to have some sort of visual while he was reloading that could have told him the unarmed person was no longer a threat. I said "could have told him". I don't know if that's what happened.
14
posted on
12/15/2006 6:20:31 PM PST
by
Shooter 2.5
(Vote a Straight Republican Ballot. Rid the country of dems. NRA)
To: A CA Guy
Has anybody read the article but Cindy. You guys are all making comments but nobody's commenting on the data in the article which makes me wonder if anybody read what the columnist went through the trouble of learning and writing about.
To: Jaysun
Has anybody read the article but Cindy. You guys are all making comments but nobody's commenting on the data in the article which makes me wonder if anybody read what the columnist went through the trouble of learning and writing about.
To: Miami Vice
Yes I've read it, and I have no problem with the cops emptying their duty weapons if they are called upon to use deadly force.
PS: an automobile in that case is a deadly weapon.
17
posted on
12/15/2006 6:25:42 PM PST
by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Miami Vice
If someone ever decides they need to shoot me, and they have the means and ability to do so, I hope they empty several clips in me, rapidly. As long as I'm going to be dead real soon now, I'd just as soon be dead a little sooner. Less time spent in agony that way.
18
posted on
12/15/2006 6:28:16 PM PST
by
ThePythonicCow
(We are but Seekers of Truth, not the Source.)
To: Miami Vice
One officer, 12 year veteran Michael Oliver, fired 31 shots, stopping to reload his weapon.
This is the guy that bothers me . He isn't the one that fired first , I'm thinking that he heard his partner firing and just opened up without having a clear target.
19
posted on
12/15/2006 6:28:33 PM PST
by
grjr21
To: Shooter 2.5
I believe that it was multiple police firing - no reloading.
So shoot to stop you aim for the foot? The kneecap? What a tough shot to have to make compared to the center of the chest.
20
posted on
12/15/2006 6:29:16 PM PST
by
69ConvertibleFirebird
(Never argue with an idiot. They drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-116 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson