You are a sinner and Jesus died on the cross to pay for your sin.
Posted on 12/16/2006 1:06:03 PM PST by Urbane_Guerilla
Ann had it right. To stop the crazy people of Islam, you would have to kill all of the adults and convert the children. That will never happen.
Sorry dude, but these are the people that consider Christians inhuman and worthy on either convertion or death. There is no negotiation! They are a religion vested and raised in total hate of everything that is not a Muslim or Islamic! But don't take my word for it. Go hug a suicide bomber and tell them Jesus loves him. See how far Christs love takes you....probably all over the street!
bump
Same with the Bhagavad Gita, but the Hindus aren't violent madmen.
Maybe, maybe not. What about the Pope's comment, no rendition there?
Looks like a good list to start with.
That statement is Muslim propaganda? In what way?
Fact: The Koran tells the Muslim that the MO man is the last and greater prophet than Christ
Fact: Most Muslims have very little understanding of Biblical teachings about Christ, they believe what the Koran teaches them
What part of those facts are you claiming is propaganda?
Since in the Muslim mind, Islam is a superior religion to Christianity, no one can criticize it, especially the infidel Pope, head of the last organization that defeated and humiliated Islam.
Islam the religion of perpetual rage
but the Hindus aren't violent madmen
Care to place a small wager on that?
For Dissent Against Hindu Extremism
by Angana Chatterji
July 28, 2002
http://www.dissidentvoice.org/Articles/AChatterji_DissentAgainstHinduExtremism.htm
Indian Christians Forced to Worship Hindu Deities
Persecution Blog ^ | November 8, 2006 | Stacy L. Harp
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1735622/posts
Posted on 11/09/2006 10:57:33 AM CST by Sopater
Christians up in arms after Hindu attack
The Australian ^ | September 13, 2006 | Bruce Loudon
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1700882/posts
Posted on 09/13/2006 2:34:35 PM CDT by Mount Athos
THE RISE OF HINDU EXTREMISM
and the Repression of Christian and
Muslim Minorities in India
http://www.freedomhouse.org/religion/publications/India/summary.htm
Film Ignites the Wrath of Hindu Fundamentalists
NY Times ^
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1626165/posts
Posted on 05/03/2006 3:15:29 PM CDT by The Lion Roars
The moral bankruptcy of Islam has been identified, discussed, verified and accepted in many circles of right-thinking in America.
Yet I am fairly certain we will never see any major organized public relations campaign to "out" Islam, (from conservatives or otherwise) mainly because most people get squeemish at the idea of pummelling any "religion" -- regardless of how looney and hateful that religion happens to be.
I have no problem telling anyone I come across that Islam is a mental disease, but that is me.
But heck, we can't even get anyone of political note to admit that having a new US Congressman swear in on the Koran is a major step toward balkanized destruction of the United States.
How in the world will anyone tolerate a major publicity campaign stating the evils of one of the world's major religions?
You are a sinner and Jesus died on the cross to pay for your sin.
Praise the Lord.... and Pass the ammo!!!
What God hasn't already done in His mighty wisdom, He often leaves up to His righteous flock here on earth.
Where as a Christians entire belief system is based on faith in Gods word and not on their Christian works, a Muslim is based on works only. Whether or not you believe the Koran is inerrant word of Allah will not affect your eventually destiny. You might lose your position in the tribe, but you will still be a Muslim
I would quibble over your use of "Word of God" for the Koran as Allah is not God in Judeo/Christian sense.
Allah and the Yahweh is very different in their attributes.
Let them decriminalize Christianity in Arabia first.
You never saw one because you can't put pron on TV.
If I had to come up with one word, I would say Christianity is about forgiveness.
The 'truth' of foregiveness, I suppose, would work also.
I've never commented on the hate threads that sometimes pop up on this site but this one takes the cake.
America, Not Keith Ellison, decides what book a congressman takes his oath on
TownHall ^ | Tuesday, November 28, 2006 | Dennis Prager
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1746587/posts
To: Rummyfan
This Prager article has been posted a number of times. It was factually inaccurate the first three times it was posted, and is still factually inaccurate.
There is absolutely no Constitutional requirement for House members or even the President to swear on the Bible when taking his oath of office - while Presidents have traditionally done so, it's not clear that any oath needs to be with one hand on the Bible to qualify as an oath (it likely doesn't), and under the Constitution, office holders can take an affirmation of office of office instead of an oath anyway. In fact, President Teddy Roosevelt didn't swear on the Bible when he became President after McKinley's death in 1901. One simply might not have been available at the time. He still became President. And Franklin Pierce (and according to some historians, Herbert Hoover) affirmed his oath of office instead of swearing it. President Pierce's faith was shaken after he and his wife were involved in a fatal train accident - they saw their own son die before their eyes. Some sources claim Pierce made his affirmation with his hand on a law book, not the Bible.
House members are traditionally sworn in en masse by the Speaker on the first day of Congress immediately after the Speaker of the House is elected and sworn in. The 2005 swearing in ceremony is available on C-SPAN's website here. The Speaker is sworn in around 2:13:30 by the Dean of the House; the rest of Congress is sworn in shortly thereafter.
All Speaker Hastert asked members to do was raise their right hands while being sworn in. As a practical matter, the House floor normally seats 448 (they somehow squeeze in more seats for the State of the Union address), and there are up to 439 other members of the House (including non-voting members from the territories and the Resident Commissioner of Puerto Rico) that need to be sworn in at that time. There isn't that much room on the floor for aides or family members to hold the Bible for Congressmen to swear on. So, as you can see from the video, most Congressmen appear to raise their right hand and put their left hand on nothing, at least during this ceremonial swearing in.
Now, there may be a chance for members to have a ceremonial one-on-one swearing in for photo-op purposes (or if the Member is not present at the opening of Congress or is later elected). For example, Congressman Rothman (D-NJ) has a picture of him being "sworn in" with his hand on what appears to be the Bible on his House website. This is when Ellison might swear on the Koran - for a photo-op.
8 posted on 11/30/2006 3:34:34 PM CST by conservative in nyc
One of the Christian tenents GWB takes seriously (almost to a fault) is to "love they neighbor as thyself."
His failure is that he refuses to demand that same Islamic "neighbor" take some responsibility in this world, or at least ADMIT that the OTHER neighbors' in the world of Islam are evil and destructive.
Furthermore, GWB should insist that these Shi'ite clerk stand up and, in front of FOXCNNABC, etc, demand these Islamo-nutball sects stop sending suicide bombers to Iraq, stop dissing Israel, ect.
Until GWB does that, his "love" for his fellow man falls empty, in my view.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.