Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The e-tailer also questioned why IBM waited until just after Amazon's first profitable quarter to "demand money" for alleged infringement when it had held the disputed patents since the mid-1990s.

Not much point suing before they had any money to take. IBM isn't one to do things for the principle of the thing.

11 posted on 12/18/2006 1:59:59 PM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
IBM isn't one to do things for the principle of the thing.

IBM could have just bought-out SCO back in 2003 as Darl & Co. were hoping, but they've probably spent more money fighting the case than the buyout would have cost. OTOH, it's probably not so much principle as it is keeping the wolves who would threaten their business at bay.

12 posted on 12/18/2006 2:03:43 PM PST by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson