Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chuckles

I had a cam less motorcycle once. It was known as a 2 cycle engine!
It seems to me that power savings is in parasitic loads because the valve action is the same as current cam operated valved engines. I will say that the idea of gasoline fuel injection may be a bit closer with this invention. As for rotary valves, too much dirt and grit would foul, score, and wear out much to quick.


17 posted on 12/26/2006 9:21:00 AM PST by encm(ss) (USN Ret.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: encm(ss)
2 cycles fire twice as often as a 4 cycle, ergo a stronger power curve. The big advantage for a 2 cycles was no valve float. The valve train,IMHO, doesn't suck 20% of the engine power, ergo a smaller than 20% power boost without one. I'm sure there will be some advantage, but not 20%. Maybe 2%. The big advantage would be electronic control of valve timing. A normal engine has torque at lower RPM's because of valve lift and duration settings. They lose at higher RPM's. Racing cams give higher lift and longer duration for higher power at high RPM's. Electronics could give you optimum power and economy at any speed.
22 posted on 12/26/2006 10:06:58 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: encm(ss)

Nice!


28 posted on 12/26/2006 12:09:11 PM PST by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus,Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson