why does it bother you that i won't discuss this case. why do you care what my opinion is. and, indeed, i gave it, i said i can see the parents point in what they did but i have grave concerns about unlimited ability to surgically alter another human being. is that not understandable? do you not agree that often one side of a debate is stifled on FR by those that scream that we are not to judge? that is my primary concern here and guess what? i am entitled to have an interest other than the one factually presented on the thread. and i think it's an important one. i will understand if you don't share it and won't think any less of you for it : )
Because you've made so many poorly capitalized and hyperventilating posts about "hearing both sides," and yet flatly refuse to tell us your side.
Let's just say that your approach offers nothing to the debate you claim to want to foster. In fact, it makes one doubt your honesty.
If you really want to foster debate, why not try giving us some specific arguments?