Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ford's Future May Rest on 2 Redesigns
ap ^ | 1/7/06 | Tom Krisher, AP Business Writer

Posted on 01/07/2007 7:50:16 AM PST by Flavius

DEARBORN, Mich. (AP) -- The challenge from Ford Motor Co.'s top brass was daunting: Take an old car and a bland one and make them better. Don't change their basic frames and footprints, but make them look and feel new. And by the way, the future of the company is at stake, because if they don't sell, the automaker could run out of money.

hat's what Ford designers and engineers faced when they set out to update the aging Focus small car and the slow-selling Five Hundred full-sized sedan.

The company will unveil new versions of both models this week at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit. A lot is riding on them when they hit the showrooms later this year as 2008 models, especially if consumers continue to shift from trucks and sport utility vehicles to cars.

"Certainly there's pressure," Lon Zaback, chief designer of the Focus, said recently as he walked around the car explaining its new features. "I don't feel any anxiety about it at all because I think we've done a terrific job."

Ford has mortgaged its assets to borrow up to $23.4 billion to fund a massive restructuring plan and cover billions in losses expected until 2009. The company, which lost $7 billion in the first nine months of last year, expects to burn up $17 billion in cash during the next two years.

Analysts say the company desperately needs sales to raise cash if it hopes to survive.

The compact Focus, first introduced in 1999, now looks old and clunky. The Five Hundred generally is perceived as good but underpowered and pedestrian.

First the company did market research to figure out what needed to change.

With the Focus, Zaback and the redesign team knew they would be limited by the car's current architecture in their efforts to modernize the company's entry in the small car market.

They raised the sheet metal on the sides, shrinking the window size to give it a sloping, sportier look, with horizontal creases in the sheet metal. There's more chrome on the grille, mimicking Ford's successful Fusion mid-sized car, and the hood became more rounded.

"The car appears to be a little bit shorter and have shorter overhangs. It has a much more sporty appearance because of some of the proportional things we did with it," Zaback said.

The interior is simple but modern with nicer seats, lighted cupholders and more expensive materials including a brushed aluminum look for the dashboard and blue instrument lighting.

The new Focus also is among the models to get the optional Ford-Microsoft "Sync" system that integrates cell phones and personal music players into the car's electronics, something Ford hopes will appeal to younger buyers.

"There's a night-and-day difference between today's Focus and the new one. We really improved it," said Greg Burgess, the vehicle development manager.

While the designers were at work, engineers were busy going over all the existing car's parts, refining the two-liter four-cylinder engine, steering and suspension. Although horsepower figures weren't released, Ford said they made the car more powerful while reducing its weight by about 100 pounds. It will be at least as fuel efficient as the current model, which gets 37 miles per gallon on the highway, said Marcio Alfonso, the chief engineer.

The Five Hundred got a less-radical redesign with changes in the front grille and rear lights and fenders to make it look more sporty and more like the Fusion.

The body didn't change much, but the car gets a modernized interior and a new 3.5-liter V6 engine with 60 more horsepower and a six-speed automatic transmission. It should be as fuel efficient and much quieter than the old one even though its zero-to-60 acceleration time is 1.5 seconds faster, Ford said. Market research showed that buyers thought the old versions were underpowered, Ford said.

It also will get optional electronic stability control, something that should get it back on the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's list of safest cars, said Killol Bhuta, the car's marketing manager.

"It was always good. We just made it better," Bhuta said.

The Five Hundred, built on Volvo architecture, sold moderately well in 2005, its first full year on the market, but sales nose-dived last year from almost 108,000 to about 84,000, something Ford hopes the redesign will reverse. Focus also saw its sales drop last year to just over 177,000, down more than 100,000 from a peak of around 286,000 in 2000.

Ford said it hasn't set prices on either the Five Hundred, which hits showrooms in the summer, or the Focus, which comes in the fall.

Several analysts who have seen the new Fords say the changes are good steps but may not be enough to fend off sharper, newer designs from the competition.

Erich Merkle, director of forecasting for the auto consulting company IRN Inc. in Grand Rapids, said the new Focus, for instance, still doesn't look as modern as Honda's Civic, which he considers to be the gold standard for small cars.

"It's a step forward, but it's not a dramatic leap," he said. "Unfortunately the competition is really moving forward in that segment."

He and Rebecca Lindland, an auto analyst at Global Insight, an economic research and consulting company, said Ford may not have had the cash to redo the Focus completely, a charge that Ford denies.

Merkle said Ford could have brought the superior European Focus to America instead of remaking the U.S. version.

"Ford does a lot of things that sometimes I just scratch my head over," he said.

Lindland likes the new Focus but said the Five Hundred still is too conservative to set it apart from competitors.

"In order to attract people into a showroom, you need to have something that's going to turn people's heads," she said. "It's not cutting edge at all."

The people working on the new cars, though, think otherwise.

"Our mind-set hasn't changed regardless of what our financial position is," said Beth Donovan, Ford's small car marketing manager. "We want to win."

On the Net: http://www.ford.com


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: autoindustry; ford; unions
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last
To: Moleman

I buy based on quality, not on nationality. Besides, with the globalization of the supply chain, that "American" car may be as American as a Siberian Tiger.


61 posted on 01/07/2007 9:42:10 AM PST by Clemenza (Put down that coffee! Coffee is for closers!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

Picture your automotive product sitting in -40 temperature all weekend and then starting it and finding the heater is adequate. If the automotive product is a Ford, then you have chosen something practical. If Ford cars are not in this picture, perhaps a Toyota or GM SUV is.


62 posted on 01/07/2007 9:42:39 AM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Why? Because Ford is controlled by bean-counters rather than engineers and designers.


63 posted on 01/07/2007 9:43:19 AM PST by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: All

I hope all you morons that buy vehicles according to your belief of the manufacturers politics and not vehicle quality enjoy your free roadside assistance programs.


64 posted on 01/07/2007 9:44:02 AM PST by JoeSixPack1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hendrix
"Ford and GM deserve to go broke and out of business if they continue to do business as usual. Bankruptcy may actual wake them up and give them a chance to dump the union failed business model."

The union is a major part of the problem, but only part. The UAW doesn't design vehicles that consumers don't want to buy. That's management's fault ... as is the marketing decision to run pickup commercials throughout NFL telecasts while viewers are getting a beer from the fridge or emptying the beer in the john.

But FReepers would never criticize management.
65 posted on 01/07/2007 9:47:45 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: flada

i drove a 1971 f100 1 mil&10k miles.drove it 34 years.so you know where i stand on fords.


66 posted on 01/07/2007 9:51:39 AM PST by old gringo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: RoadTest
"When Ford downsized the Taurus"

"I didn't know they ever downsized the Taurus. Really?"

Ford never downsized Taurus. But, after minimal changes over 20 years, no one other than rental fleets would consider buying it.
67 posted on 01/07/2007 9:51:47 AM PST by BW2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

I heard a rumor that Toyota is thinking of buying Ford. Anybody else hear that?


68 posted on 01/07/2007 9:55:51 AM PST by Just Lori (Blessed are the peacemakers: ARMY, NAVY, AIR FORCE, MARINES, COAST GUARD!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer
and they have a punched up 600+ hp model that is a true car... unfortunately both are out of marketable price range

.

69 posted on 01/07/2007 10:02:30 AM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
2008 Ford Focus concept pix

Yawn. They're doomed.

70 posted on 01/07/2007 10:07:32 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

Crazy? Well yes ... I'm so proletariat I'd love to own a convertible VW from the early seventies. Can't justify it though ... I drive a pickup truck.


71 posted on 01/07/2007 10:08:43 AM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Flavius
2008 Ford Five Hundred concept photos

They are TOTALLY hosed.

72 posted on 01/07/2007 10:09:28 AM PST by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RadioAstronomer

The retro Mustang and the new GT are the two things Ford has done right in the last 15 years. Unfortunately for Ford, the price of the GT is way too high to allow enough quantity to make much money.


73 posted on 01/07/2007 10:17:59 AM PST by Poser (Willing to fight for oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Flavius

TheY're calling the 500 'full size"? Tell Toyota to come get em.


74 posted on 01/07/2007 10:18:10 AM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry
A 1986 Ford Taurus.

At Ford quality is job #1 because they have no QUALITY. Ford is too busy sucking up to all of the liberal socialist groups to care about QUALITY and producing products for the consumer.
75 posted on 01/07/2007 10:19:25 AM PST by GaryMontana (islam, the Nazis of today must either be destroyed -- or the human race will perish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
and they have a punched up 600+ hp model that is a true car... unfortunately both are out of marketable price range

Why I have a 505 hp Vette. :-)

76 posted on 01/07/2007 10:36:44 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Yawn. They're doomed.

Just another "Burb Beater".

77 posted on 01/07/2007 10:37:41 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

LOL! :-)


78 posted on 01/07/2007 10:38:08 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Poser
Unfortunately for Ford, the price of the GT is way too high to allow enough quantity to make much money.

Why I don't have one. I could afford it, but I just could not get myself to shuck the bucks for one. Same with the Ferrari F340. I drove all three, and ended up choosing the Vette. Best bang for the bucks. (and insurance rate - LOL)

However, I do have a friend who own all three. The F340, Z06, and Ford-GT. - Nice stable there.

79 posted on 01/07/2007 10:41:40 AM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
>http://www.gapantenna.com/titan.html

Me too--in 1958!

80 posted on 01/07/2007 10:44:18 AM PST by Joe Bfstplk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson