Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: prophetic

Let's not lie! It was Bush 41! We all know how everyone feels about President Clinton, but at least be truthful!


17 posted on 01/11/2007 10:05:46 PM PST by napscoordinator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: napscoordinator

Here is what I remember. The approval to go from from 18 to 10 divisions happened under Bush 41.

Clinton cut the army about another 25% but didn't cut any divisions. Clintons cut were under the radar. For example, an armor battalion back in 1992 was 4 companies of 14 tanks and 2 for the battalion headquarters for a total of 58 tanks. Clinton cut out a company from every battalion. So each battalion then had 44 tanks. This happened to all combat arms battalions. Then all units that support these battalions experienced similar cuts. Most people didn't see these cuts.


21 posted on 01/12/2007 10:25:27 AM PST by art_rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson