Posted on 01/15/2007 7:33:10 AM PST by kellynla
Some things cry out for explanation. Like finding $90,000 in marked bills in a Congressman's freezer. Or finding out that a blue-chip lawyer who held one of the most important jobs in the nation was willing to risk his career, his livelihood, and his liberty to steal, hide, and destroy classified documents.
We all have a pretty good idea what the money was doing in Representative William Jefferson's freezer. But the questions about President William Jefferson Clinton's National Security Adviser, Sandy Berger, just keep piling up.
It's time we got some answers.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Amen.
The truth about what he did is so damning to libs, that they are now in a state of denial. They are quite unwilling to look at this because the facts are so awful. Berger is plainly guilty of a major crime, but Big Media cannot bring themselves to investigate. Because it sabotages everything they've been claiming about Clinton not being responsible for 9/11. Because he was.
Sandy Berger is NOT protected by democrats... (as much as)
NOT being prosecuted by REPUBLICANS..
Its REPUBLICANS that we need answers from.. not democrats..
Sandy Berger is BEING PROTECTED BY REPUBLICANS..
WHY?...
Equally culpable on different levels----knowing of, but not reporting, a crime is a crime.
And that is the very scary part about what is occurring in our country now.
The problem with FOIA is that Sandy Berger stole the original documents with hand-written notes in the margins. Those documents do not exist. They are gone.
All of the FOIA in the world will not tell us what was on those pages. We can see what was within the margins, but not the hand written notes.
It could have been Clinton ordering our forces to let Osama go, who knows?
The congressional report indicates that Berger had access to original documents. Original documents are often marked up to contain information that is not in the electronic document.
Like if I wrote a report and sent you a PDF copy. You print it, write comments on it, then hand it to someone else for them to review. They comment on it and pass it to someone else.
That document, with your handwriting on it is an "original document" but there is no electronic copy of it. This is what was stolen.
Now, did they have handwritten notes and what would those notes say? Nobody knows. Most likely, the prosecuter said something like "There is no evidence to prove that Berger destroyed such documents"...that is how they do it. No evidence.
What? - Top Secret records
Why? - To destroy them and cover up for his own and Bubba's criminal negligence/purposes in ignoring deadly threats to America so they wouldn't get exposed by the 9/11 Commission
There. That was quick and easy, wasn't it?
............
Well stated.
It is mind boggling how these clintonistas seem to be bulletproof.
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.