Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lorianne

Interesting post... this comes from a press release from this group PEER, which also was run by skeptic.com (which is banned on FR for reasons I know not); but some of skeptic's readers were, well, skeptical.

The National Park Service staff are outraged at the suggestion that park staff are expected to teach young-earth creationism. It's complete hooey, as the staff of "skeptic" discovered when they investigated (after, mind you, running the press release).

Here is what the NPS actually says about the geological history of the Grand Canyon (scroll down):

http://www2.nature.nps.gov/geology/parks/grca/

So as you see, the article is bullsh..... er, inaccurate. The editor of "skeptic.com" (a website) gamely ate crow over this issue and now believes that the PEER press release was fabricated. The MSM outlet that ran the story in this thread probably won't.

New media on one hand, old media on the other. Think of it as evolution in action.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F


2 posted on 01/19/2007 6:32:10 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F (Maybe the war is lost but let's still kill the enemy, just to offend Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Criminal Number 18F
If political correctness is more important than science, we should attribute the creation story of the Grand Canyon to Native Americans. After all, Native Americans lived near the Grand Canyon long before any fundamental Christians started coming in tourist buses. And seniority should count for something.

And Native Americans have lots of good stories. Here's one now!


Crow Creation Story

In the beginning, Old Man Coyote stood alone with water surrounding him. Two ducks swam by, and Coyote asked if they had seen anyone else. The ducks said no but thought that something might exist under the water.

Coyote asked if they would travel underwater for him and report on what they saw. The ducks did as they were asked, finding nothing. He asked again, and the ducks returned with a root. On the third try, they found mud and Coyote was happy. He told the ducks that they could build with it, and he began to shape and mold the mud into an island. He blew on it, and it expanded. He blew again, and it grew into the earth. The ducks said they did not like the earth's emptiness, so Coyote created grass and trees out of the roots that came from the water.

Coyote and the ducks loved the earth, but it was flat. They wanted rivers, valleys, mountains, and lakes. So it was done. Soon Coyote and the ducks made a perfect earth, but they grew lonely, with only the three of them to sit and enjoy the land. So Coyote molded dirt to form men and then more mud to create many types of male ducks. Soon, they realized that without women, the males could not have children. So with more dirt he made women and female ducks to populate the earth.

One day Old Man Coyote traveled upon the land and was surprised to find another Coyote. When asked where he came from, the younger brother, named Shirape, said he was unsure of his origin and only knew he existed. As the two traveled along, Shirape wanted Old Man Coyote to make other animals, for only ducks, humans, and the two Coyotes had been created. The elder Coyote agreed, and as he spoke the new animals' names, they were created. He said "Elk" and an elk appeared. He said "Bear" and a bear appeared. This is how it was until all animals were created.


3 posted on 01/19/2007 8:20:30 PM PST by Coyoteman (Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Criminal Number 18F
The press release is not fabricated. The PEER letter is still at their website, right here.

I am, like Skeptic magazine, a *bit* irritated on this. And like, Skeptic, in my overeagerness to write the letter, didn't dig deeper as I usually do on issues. You can be sure that I am going to explicitly wary of anything that comes out of PEER anymore. While this misleading information running about, PEER is going to be losing its credibility and burning bridges. This will harm them more, I believe, in the long-term perspective. People like me and media outlets like Skeptic have awfully long-term memory when it becomes to being mislead.

I am going to do the legwork now to bring everyone else who was duped to be unduped.
5 posted on 01/22/2007 9:59:49 AM PST by Stewart.Thorpe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Criminal Number 18F
I wrote:

The editor of "skeptic.com" (a website) gamely ate crow over this issue.... The MSM outlet that ran the story in this thread probably won't.

Er, assuming that the Stewart.Thorpe who posted here is actually Stewart Thorpe, which seems from his tone to be an eminently reasonable assumption, I need to eat crow now.

Stewart, thank you for standing up for standards. Good luck to you.

d.o.l.

Criminal Number 18F

8 posted on 01/23/2007 5:57:59 PM PST by Criminal Number 18F (Maybe the war is lost but let's still kill the enemy, just to offend Nancy Pelosi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson