Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fabian
Is this the device you ordered?

http://www.fuelsaving.info/khaos.htm

One common complaint us skeptics have when many of the fuel savings testimonials are done is they are not installed as the only change in the engine. Many older cars that have such devices also get a much needed tune up, replacing plugs, etc, at the same time. If you want to have a valid comparison, make installing this device the only change you make. Then, by all means, get back to us after 5 tank fill-ups with results.
88 posted on 01/30/2007 9:23:53 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: thackney

ok...will do. I do keep good record of my mpg's so it will be accurate. Btw...the vaporizer I made in 1982 was the only change I did on the '62 plymouth fury and it went from 13 to 28 mpg's on the highway. I know you find it hard to believe but that's what Charles Pogue did but of course much more efficiently and he used hotter exhaust gases. I just duplicated a simple invention that I bought from the national car drivers association in Washington. I don't know if they still exist? But of course that won't work any longer as the gas has a higher vaporization temp nowadays, unfortunatley. I'm sure it will work using the exhaust manifold or gases though. It's just a bit much for me to do working long hours as it is and a limited income.


91 posted on 01/30/2007 9:57:08 AM PST by fabian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson