Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Not a word about what to do about the CRIMINALS.

I don't think anyone has ever seen a gun, legal or illegal get up and just shoot someone by itself.

Britain, Australia top U.S. in violent crime. Rates Down Under (Australia) increase despite strict gun-control measures

1 posted on 01/24/2007 3:36:50 PM PST by IntelliQuark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: IntelliQuark

Geez. I just can't stock up fast enough. This is going to be a very frustrating 2, or 6, or 10 years.


2 posted on 01/24/2007 3:39:03 PM PST by Radio_Silence
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

The Dems realized that gun-control was poisen for them, so they shut up about it to get elected. Now that they have control of Congress they can't help themselves. They couldn't even wait a month before trotting out scads of new gun-control schemes. If they keep it up they will lose big in 2008.


3 posted on 01/24/2007 3:44:28 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

Career politicians know only too well that nothing deflects attention from their own dishonesty and ineffectuality like standing up in a position of prominence and screaming at the top of their lungs about a great deal of utter phony baloney.


4 posted on 01/24/2007 3:45:30 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

They are barking up the wrong tree. Yes, guns should not be allowed in the hands of kids (IMO) just like we tell them that they cannot drink, drive a car, enlist or vote until they reach a certain age. However, they will not address the issues that are the problem and that is out of control kids, ghetto culture, drug and alcohol abuse and poverty.

Solve those and people will have less of a need to go bust a cap in someone's ass.....


5 posted on 01/24/2007 3:45:50 PM PST by misterrob (Jack Bauer/Chuck Norris 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

I just about had a heart attack about the media using the phrase "gun rights group" instead of "eeeeevil gun lobby" till I saw it was CNSNews. I thought it was CNN!


7 posted on 01/24/2007 3:48:04 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark
They really shouldn't bunch up like that.

Creates a target-rich environment.

9 posted on 01/24/2007 5:23:38 PM PST by elkfersupper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: harpseal; TexasCowboy; AAABEST; Travis McGee; Squantos; Shooter 2.5; wku man; SLB; ...
Enemy Action ping.

Click the Gadsden flag for pro-gun resources!

11 posted on 01/25/2007 5:06:53 AM PST by Joe Brower (The Constitution defines Conservatism. *NRA*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

Isn't Peter King on our side? He's solid on imigration, I think.


14 posted on 01/25/2007 5:19:35 AM PST by kerryusama04 (Isa 8:20, Eze 22:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark
Is there a list of the 50 mayors?
17 posted on 01/25/2007 5:30:13 AM PST by ExSoldier (Democracy is 2 wolves and a lamb voting on dinner. Liberty is a well armed lamb contesting the vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark
"a bi-partisan Congressional Task Force on Illegal Guns," which is to be led by Reps. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), Peter King (R-N.Y.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.)."

That sounds "bi-partisan" to me, there are two "D"s and two "R"s, cant go wrong. </sarcasm>

21 posted on 01/25/2007 5:47:52 AM PST by P8riot (I carry a gun because I can't carry a cop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

Criminals? Isn't it a crime to conspire to deprive people of their civil rights? Imo, there are plenty of criminals participating in the summit, just for starters.


24 posted on 01/25/2007 5:57:28 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark

What are "Illegal Arms"? Who gets to make that definition?

The mayors must be running short on people who want to be victims. Because without lots of victims, you can't get the grant funds to divert for your pet projects, as in a certain southern city. You have to make the streets safer for criminals so that they can be productive and give you a crime rate to complain about. Anyway, shooting gang bangers tends to anger them and that might lead to confrontation.


29 posted on 01/25/2007 6:12:46 AM PST by Steamburg (If we don't want our nation bad enough to protect it, it won't be ours long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark
Not a word about what to do about the CRIMINALS.

They don't want to offend their voter base by arresting them.

31 posted on 01/25/2007 6:17:05 AM PST by Sender ("Great powers should never get involved in the politics of small tribes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark
"Mayors' Summit on Illegal Arms..." Oh, I thought the title read "Illegal Aliens" not "Illegal Arms."

What a Joke!!! Mayors are upset over "illegal arms" not "illegal aliens" - now I really am mad.

32 posted on 01/25/2007 6:20:13 AM PST by zerosix
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: IntelliQuark
During its day-long event, the Mayors Against Illegal Guns Coalition (MAIG) "discussed the importance of gun trace data, joint lobbying against harmful federal legislation, cutting-edge political strategies and the unique initiatives being undertaken by mayors across the country on this issue," the group said in a news release.

The mayors also announced the creation of "a bi-partisan Congressional Task Force on Illegal Guns," which is to be led by Reps. Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.), John Conyers, Jr. (D-Mich.), Peter King (R-N.Y.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.).

UNITED STATES CODE, U.S. CRIMINAL CODE
Title 18, § 241:

Conspiracy against rights

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or
If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—
They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both,

or may be sentenced to death.

54 posted on 01/26/2007 10:40:02 AM PST by archy (Et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. [from Virgil's *Aeneid*.])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson