Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big house a symbol of an American tragedy
The Boston Globe ^ | 1-28-07 | Beverly Beckham

Posted on 01/28/2007 11:48:56 AM PST by BronzePencil

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 last
To: Howlin

You posted it. If you want privacy, stay private.


181 posted on 01/28/2007 8:16:06 PM PST by narses (St Thomas says "lex injusta non obligat.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

LOL .. I laugh at that dumb concoction, too. How tacky.


182 posted on 01/28/2007 8:32:45 PM PST by STARWISE (They (Rats) think of this WOT as Bush's war, not America's war-RichardMiniter, respected OBL author)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: AZLiberty

"In Europe, homes are built to last for generations, so that a free reserve of capital -- rather than a generator of waste -- is passed down through the ages."

Isn't that what death taxes are supposed to prevent?


183 posted on 01/28/2007 10:13:07 PM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

The first room you enter after coming from outside where you can take off your snowy or muddy shoes, get out of wet jackets, etc. and not track dirt and water into the main part of the house. I think people up here call it a breezeway. But unlike my breezeway, it's totally weather-tight and heated like the rest of the house. Some mud rooms have the washer and dryer there for convenience.


184 posted on 01/29/2007 5:41:17 AM PST by rabidralph (Hoo-ray, Beer!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph

Ok, we call ours "utility room."


185 posted on 01/29/2007 6:55:55 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill

You're right on with those comments. A more productive story may have come to light if the reporter had interviewed a few of those big house owners. Who knows, maybe they would turn out to be evil money hoarders whose success came from illicit or immoral conduct. That would have give the article some weight. But an interview might have revealed them as kind, moral, educated, hard working people who made good decisions and society is better for their efforts, regardless of how big their house may be. But that would not have fit this reporter's agenda. So she took the easy way out and just wrote commentary from her biased victim based perspective.


186 posted on 01/29/2007 7:20:11 AM PST by JTHomes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: JTHomes
an interview might have revealed them as kind, moral, educated, hard working people who made good decisions and society is better for their efforts, regardless of how big their house may be. But that would not have fit this reporter's agenda.

Then there is the possibility that she did interview the people, found them as you describe, and therefore decided to feign ignorance in order to maintain the agenda. Not that any reporter would actually do that.

187 posted on 01/29/2007 8:33:56 AM PST by etlib (No creature without tentacles has ever developed true intelligence)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: Lx

"Not only do they all look alike, they barely have enough room to get a lawnmower between the houses and yet the houses must have at least a 3000 sq foot floor plan."

Not my idea of a high-end home to be sure, but not a new idea. Many expensive homes were built in cities in the 19th and early 20th centuries, right up against each other on relatively small lots. In any case, from my "dream" house's yard you wouldn't be able to see any other houses.


188 posted on 01/29/2007 8:47:09 AM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The_Media_never_lie

You can't legislate good taste.


189 posted on 01/29/2007 9:04:38 AM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: -YYZ-
Not my idea of a high-end home to be sure, but not a new idea. Many expensive homes were built in cities in the 19th and early 20th centuries, right up against each other on relatively small lots. In any case, from my "dream" house's yard you wouldn't be able to see any other houses.

Obviously they do it to maximize density. I agree with your dream home. Unfortunately, we only bought a 1/2 acre but we are still far away from our neighbors and I've never ever seen a house that looks like the one I live in.

190 posted on 01/29/2007 11:32:07 AM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: Myrddin
I see you're in Idaho. I've only been there a couple of times but I loved it. I knew a family up there and when we visited, all the neighbors actually knew each other and it was a very 2nd amendment friendly place.

The minimum floor plan on my street is 3500 sq ft. My house is the small one on the street. Only 3900 sq ft. It does sit on 1/3 acre. It is a custom house. Not to my specs, but to the specs of the original builder. Every house on the street is different. All owner occupied.

Sound like the developer really did mean custom houses. Here in California, custom house means the exact same floor plan, they just invert it our put the garage on the left side of the front door instead of on the right.

191 posted on 01/29/2007 11:35:45 AM PST by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Lx
Sound like the developer really did mean custom houses. Here in California, custom house means the exact same floor plan, they just invert it our put the garage on the left side of the front door instead of on the right.

That describes my old neighborhood in Mira Mesa (north San Diego). Sometimes they even change the colors :-) I left when the customization included gang graffiti. It was a nice house in a nice neighborhood when I purchased it in 1983. I almost waited too long to sell it by 2000.

2nd amendment friendliness was a key requirement in selecting a replacement for San Diego. The endless parade of anti-gun laws from Sacramento was intolerable. Idaho is a big improvement.

192 posted on 01/29/2007 11:49:28 AM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 191 | View Replies]

To: Hildy
Instead of worrying what people do with their own money...journalists should start investigating what the government is doing with your money.

Bravo Sierra!

193 posted on 01/29/2007 11:52:08 AM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (Our national sovereignty and cohesion as a country is not for sale at any price.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: billhilly

It looks yankee to me.

Down south we don't connect our living quarters with the barn.


194 posted on 01/29/2007 12:03:51 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. .... It's spit on a lefty day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: narses

That's not a house. It's a compound.


195 posted on 01/29/2007 12:05:40 PM PST by AppyPappy (If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lx

Actually, my dreams are relatively modest, or at least would have been 15 years ago and 1000 miles from here. The last home I shared with my parents was a real beauty. Probably "only" a little over 2000 sq ft, exterior was all brick and cedar siding, on .9 acres of wooded property on an island (connected by a causeway) with 150 ft of water frontage. For the first 6 years we lived there the lot next door was empty - the people who bought it cleared far too many of the trees (or rather the people they hired to do the work did - they weren't pleased) too close to the property line. Next big wind storm we had a 14" diameter 60' tall fir tree laying across our driveway when we came home. Every house on that island was custom built, and there was a real variety. Classic places like ours. Big ranch-style places. Even a geodesic dome. My parents sold that place for CDN$170,000 in '94. Where I live now I couldn't buy a comparable piece of land for less than $500,000, probably more. Without a house.


196 posted on 01/29/2007 12:16:12 PM PST by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
Liberals hate everything that makes this country great and holy from the rest of the world. I don't understand why they think that adopting 3rd world polices that it would improve conditions here. As far as I know conditions are overall pretty good economically. So people complain but overall historically things are o.k.

I guess they want to turn this country into the 3rd world. Were everyone takes care of everyone by doing nothing.

197 posted on 01/29/2007 2:32:30 PM PST by KingArthur305
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: Hildy

Ms. Whiner apparently is unaware that the taxes paid on these houses funds a couple of teams by themselves.


198 posted on 01/29/2007 2:36:29 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit (If you believe ANYTHING in the Treason Media you are a fool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-198 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson