Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Robert Byrd: Bush Wants War With Iran
Newsmax ^ | 1/30/07 | staff report

Posted on 01/30/2007 8:50:40 AM PST by meg88

Top Democrat Sen. Robert Byrd is warning that the Bush administration is preparing to go to war with Iran.

In a e-mail message sent to activist Democrats, the West Virginia lawmaker – who is now President pro tempore of the Senate and third in line for the presidency after Dick Cheney and Nancy Pelosi – rails against President Bush’s plans for a troop surge in Iraq and declares:

"Not only does Mr. Bush intend to plunge us deeper into what is now clearly a civil war in Iraq, but he is now increasing his belligerence towards Iran and Syria. In his State of the Union address, Mr. Bush called out Iran no less than seven times.

"I fear that what we are seeing now is an administration intent on laying the groundwork for a wider war in the Middle East.

Story Continues Below

That is why it is so important for us to reject Mr. Bush’s plan for more troops in Iraq. Once escalation in Iraq begins, there is no telling what ruinous consequences await this nation.” The e-mail – sent out under the banner of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee – contains a link to a petition addressed to Bush, urging him to abandon his "escalation strategy.”

© NewsMax 2007. All rights reserved.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; US: West Virginia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 01/30/2007 8:50:42 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: meg88

And your point is, Byrd Brain?


2 posted on 01/30/2007 8:51:39 AM PST by sono (There are only two exit strategies - One is victory, the other defeat - Joe Lieberman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sono

Doesn't he have a cross burning he should be at?


3 posted on 01/30/2007 8:52:18 AM PST by dfwgator (The University of Florida - Championship U)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sono
Byrd removed his drool bucket long enough to make coherent statement?
4 posted on 01/30/2007 8:52:49 AM PST by zarf (Giuliani/Hunter 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sono

5 posted on 01/30/2007 8:52:54 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Grand Ben-Wa of Klan Pink?


6 posted on 01/30/2007 8:52:59 AM PST by xcamel (Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Does Grand-Wizard-of-soiled-sheets Byrd fear his fellow anti-semite in Tehran is in danger?


7 posted on 01/30/2007 8:53:52 AM PST by SolidWood (Sadr lives. Kill him.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

And Senator Byrd, apparently, has no problem with our soldiers being killed by Iranian RPG's and IED's....


8 posted on 01/30/2007 8:53:59 AM PST by NeoCaveman (out, out, damn rats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

Well, Byrd wants war with them blue-bellied Yankees.


9 posted on 01/30/2007 8:54:40 AM PST by Chi-townChief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

NEO-CONS RULE! Get ready Byrd, we're going to drag President Bush into another conflict. This time we're going to tell President Bush to NUKE 'em, make 'em the world's biggest glass factory! /s


10 posted on 01/30/2007 8:55:39 AM PST by tobyhill (The War on Terrorism is not for the weak.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

There were term limits under the Articles of Confederation.

Ah, those were the days.


11 posted on 01/30/2007 8:56:04 AM PST by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88

As soon as we went into the Middle East, the DBM started saying that Bush was going into Iran and North Korea. Planning for every possible scenario is NOT the same as going in soon. The DBM does whatever it can to make W the bad guy. I guess it worked for '06.


12 posted on 01/30/2007 8:56:26 AM PST by Freee-dame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sono

So KKK Bobby is worried about USA belligerence towards Iran and Syria???

What about their belligerence towards the USA? And I suppose I could lump Israel in there also.

Old senile KKK Bobby should have packed it in decades ago.

But I guess this is typical of the Libs. Get used to it - we have 2 more years of it coming. Bash Bush and bash America.


13 posted on 01/30/2007 8:56:52 AM PST by 66-442hot (Grubbin' for money?? Why not??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Chi-townChief

14 posted on 01/30/2007 8:57:14 AM PST by meg88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: meg88

15 posted on 01/30/2007 8:57:40 AM PST by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88
I fear that what we are seeing now is an administration intent on laying the groundwork for a wider war in the Middle East.

I wish that were true but I don't see much evidence of it. Sooner or later we're going to have to force a regime change in Iran or start bombing their nuke facilities. But no one in the administration seems to be laying the political groundwork for a confrontation with Iran.

16 posted on 01/30/2007 8:57:45 AM PST by pgkdan (Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions - G.K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: meg88
Would someone please slap Sen. "KKK" Byrd and tell him that Iran should have ceased to exist on Nov. 5th, 1979.
If we'd had a real President back then we wouldn't have had a WTC I or II.
There wouldn't have been a Gulf War I or II.
Thanks for nothing Comrades.


17 posted on 01/30/2007 8:59:00 AM PST by ASA Vet (The WOT should have been over on 9/12/01.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

What the dems are truly scared of is another galvanizing military effort that pulls more voters over to the republican party in the lead up to the next presidential election.

They are not stupid. They realize that Iran is quite different from Iraq in that people are concerned already about Iran and since Iran is not even really pretending anymore that they are seeking nuclear weapons it is a whole different ballgame.

Democrats are stuck with trying to convince people that Iran having nuclear weapons is "ok" or to try and quagmire it away and delay by constant referrals to the UN in the hopes that they can belay any military effort that would bring more people to the presidents side.


18 posted on 01/30/2007 8:59:57 AM PST by Muttering Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: meg88

So do I. A war with the gov't there is in the world's best interest.


19 posted on 01/30/2007 9:00:01 AM PST by pissant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Muttering Mike
Bingo.

Right after we went into Iraq the dems went crazy about protecting Iran and Syria. Note that Byrd included Syria even though no on eis mentioning Syria right now.

These are two of the worst regimes on Earth, and the dems are hell bent on protecting them. That is why the dems are so vulnerable IF the republicans had the willingness to expose them.

20 posted on 01/30/2007 9:06:08 AM PST by Williams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson