[Gator113]

While I have many issues with RG, I ask any RG supporter to please help me with but one issue........his stand on the 2A!

Certainly, I love and support the brilliance of our Constitution and the guarantees of ALL of our rights. As a patriot, Nam vet, and free law abiding citizen of this country........ I will NOT disarm, regardless of whom the president might be.

The 2A has always been important.....but my God folks, we are at War with much of the world.....a 'gun grabber' would have us naked before our enemy.

Again, I ask RG supporter to please help me with but one issue........his stand on the 2A!

[dirtboy]

his stand on the 2A!

I'm not a supporter.

Freeper Pharmboy had permits for two handguns in NYC for many years.

Rudy squeezed them out of him even though he had never had any problems.

So two gun permits that survived David Dinkins did not survive Rudy.

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

Rudy's not a "gun grabber" this is nothing but hollow rhetoric over the time he zoned a particular deadly, crime ridden zone in Down town New York as well as the subways. He banned the possession of guns in those zones and ONLY those zones.

His plan worked and he cleaned up violent crime to such an extent that people could freely and comfortably move about the area again with out fearing for their lives.

The knee jerkers want you to think that because he took these drastic measures, he is going after all the guns in the country. When in fact, he has done nothing of the sort and goes out of his way to assure us that he would do no such thing if he were President.

Not to mention, it would be difficult for any President to go against the second amendment. It's just that logically simple, unless you are one who has very little logic.

[SJackson]

While I have many issues with RG, I ask any RG supporter to please help me with but one issue........his stand on the 2A!

He has yet to speak of these things in the context of a Presidential campaign. It's worth noting that GWB would have signed the Brady Bill extension. I think the best you can hope for is a sincere position that it's a state an local rather than federal issue, recognition that it's an individual not collective right, and conservative judges. Of course Alan Dershowitz and Lawerence Tribe take the first two positions, and they'd regulate the heck out of individual ownership. In fairness, the President's constituency isn't the same as a mayors, but he's got explanations to make on this and other issues.