Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats and World War IV
American Thinker ^ | February 06, 2007 | Ted Belman

Posted on 02/06/2007 12:28:47 AM PST by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 02/06/2007 12:28:49 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

"If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will."

This alone could doom her chances of being elected.

2 posted on 02/06/2007 12:46:57 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

If the Democrats had their way, we'd issue an indictment for every terrorist who attacks us, and then pray that the terrorist walks into a police station and turns himself in.

Sure... The Democrats are about as sane as King George.


3 posted on 02/06/2007 12:47:20 AM PST by coconutt2000 (NO MORE PEACE FOR OIL!!! DOWN WITH TYRANTS, TERRORISTS, AND TIMIDCRATS!!!! (3-T's For World Peace))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

jihad bump


4 posted on 02/06/2007 1:30:17 AM PST by Dajjal (See my FR homepage for an essay about Ahmadinejad.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

"If we in Congress don't end this war before January 2009, as president, I will."

She better hope things are REAL quiet between now and then. That statement was a BIG gamble - and not a bright one. It really has no significant up side but a potentially huge downside.


5 posted on 02/06/2007 1:40:49 AM PST by RobRoy (Islam is a greater threat to the world today than Nazism was in 1938.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Didn't the Clinton's claim that Hillary was co-president?

Doesn't that make her term limited out now?

And just because you refuse to fight in a war doesn't mean the war ends. It just means you get slaughtered until it does.
6 posted on 02/06/2007 2:03:15 AM PST by DB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

Only way I can see her calculation on this is that any Democrat will be elected in Nov. and her real task it to win the Dem Primary.

And she's willing to run far left to get it.

Either that or she figures she can always change her mind - again.

:)


7 posted on 02/06/2007 2:06:12 AM PST by D-fendr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy
That statement was a BIG gamble - and not a bright one. It really has no significant up side but a potentially huge downside.

I think in Hillary's eyes, it's no gamble at all. She's intimately aware of just how short the memory of the American public is. She's not so much making campaign "promises"...she's running up trial balloons to gauge a response and to see who wants to hear what so she can shovel it to them. (Same thing with the whole take-the-obscene-profit-made-by-Big-Oil-and-spend-it-on-alternative-fuel-development.) She learned a thing or two from Mr. Rodham Clinton about governing by the polling data!

8 posted on 02/06/2007 2:15:50 AM PST by hoosier_RW_conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Bush cannot say "Iraq is a staging area for the upcoming conflict with Iran".

But soon enough it will apparent for all to see.

Even Ms. Clinton.


BUMP

9 posted on 02/06/2007 2:32:38 AM PST by capitalist229 (Get Democrats out of our pockets and Republicans out of our bedrooms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DB

Hillary intends to be our Commander In Chief. That's all folks !


10 posted on 02/06/2007 3:09:33 AM PST by Republican Babe (God bless America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

What she said:

"If I had been president in 2002, I would not have started this war."




What she meant:

"But since I was in the Senate instead, I did vote for this war."


11 posted on 02/06/2007 3:28:46 AM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

bump...rto


12 posted on 02/06/2007 3:49:08 AM PST by visitor (dems Undermine National Defense, Mislead their Voter Base, Demoralize Troops, Encourage the Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
Kennedy and other leftists are still saying that we need to use diplomacy in dealing with Iran and Syria. That is a page out of Jimmy Carter's naive "the emperor has not clothes" book. Talking to Iran would achieve nothing except us acceding to their nuke program. Of course Pat Buchanan doesn't have a problem with that either.
13 posted on 02/06/2007 5:12:43 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RobRoy

"She better hope things are REAL quiet between now and then. That statement was a BIG gamble - and not a bright one. It really has no significant up side but a potentially huge downside."

Reverse it. If she is elected President and she doesn't bring the troops home, the MSM will never bring to light her original statement. What they will bring to light is her vote for the war.

Hillary never says anything that hasn'r been scripted, polled and tested.


14 posted on 02/06/2007 5:28:31 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (The Clintons: A Malignant Malfeasance of the Most Morbid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Hillary Clinton: "If I had been president in 2002, I would not have started this war."

Actually, Hillary was president, or at least co-president, when the "war" started.

The "war" was started by Islamic terrorists during the first Clinton administration. Hillary's husband did nothing, and it escalated to the point where America had to act.

During the second Clinton administration (heaven forbid!), will Hillary sit idly by as Islamic extremists continue to extort and terrorize their way to greater world power? Let's hope we never have to find out.

15 posted on 02/06/2007 5:30:07 AM PST by wai-ming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wai-ming

Hillary might follow Kennedy's advise and seek to resolve everything with diplomacy!!! Big success HUH.


16 posted on 02/06/2007 5:43:10 AM PST by GeorgefromGeorgia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

17 posted on 02/06/2007 6:18:39 AM PST by Gritty (The Left shares the aims of the enemy abroad in order to defeat the enemy at home - Dinesh D’Souza)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Hillary is smarter than the other Democrats, and tougher than the other Democrats -- I'd still infinitely prefer any Republican to her, but if she were elected I wouldn't expect the government to just roll over and surrender, as it would if any other Democrat were elected.

Eventually, the country is going to wake up and realize that we are at war with ISLAM itself (I don't like this conclusion, but the almost universal silent acquiescence to the jihadists' rhetoric by the "moderate" Muslims EVEN IN THIS COUNTRY WHERE THEY ARE PHYSICALLY SAFE TO SAY WHAT THEY WANT forces me to it).

When that happens, it will rapidly become clear that we do NOT face an existential threat as we did in WWII or the Cold War. It may well take the loss of 1 or 2 U.S. cities, but once that happens it will all be over for the Muslims. The West is enervated and frivolous right now, but it retains, deep down, a bred-in-the-bone capacity for overwhelming violence. Even the wimpy liberals who had been unable to imagine that those motivated primarily by religion could possibly become powerful enough to threaten their modern lifestyle will be just as fierce when the war comes home to them.

Once the U.S.A. comes together on this, it will all be over very quickly indeed.


18 posted on 02/06/2007 6:58:25 AM PST by VeritatisSplendor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I'm still waiting for the Victory in the Cold War parties, the Ticker-tape parades, the national holiday...


19 posted on 02/06/2007 12:48:21 PM PST by Inwoodian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Inwoodian
I'm still waiting for the Victory in the Cold War parties, the Ticker-tape parades, the national holiday...


The Left lost the Cold War so dont look for any joy from them on that

20 posted on 02/06/2007 1:34:39 PM PST by Nat Turner (DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson